skip to main content

Reformulating The Concept of State Principles Based on Ideological and Technocratic Strategic as A Sustainable Development Direction

*Bagus Oktafian Abrianto  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Farid Ibrahim  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Xavier Nugraha  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2020 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

National development planning model with its long-term time dimension in Indonesia is carried out with the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN) which replaces the Planned Overall National Development (PNSB) and the General Outlines of the Principles of the State (GBHN). Based on the analysis of the data obtained, it can be seen that since 2004 the use of the RPJN has turned out to cause fluctuating dynamics in the existing development outcomes. The occurred changes resulted in inconsistencies in the direction of development when there was a change of state development actors such as President, Governor, Regent/ Mayor, and other state institutions. The reason for this is that there is no permanent structure that can be used as a reference for a long-term development program that will be carried out by the managing state institutions, particularly the government. Based on this, the aim of this study was to create a form of reformulation of the principles of the state. This research was a normative research with a statutory, historical and conceptual approaches. To answer this problem, the idea of the state principles was born which departed from combining the advantages of PNSB, GBHN, and RPJPN which were then packaged into a new state principle system, with ideological principle and technocratic strategy.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: GBHN; State Principles; PNSB; RPJPN

Article Metrics:

  1. Ruslan, A. (2011). Teori dan Panduan Praktik Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education PuKap Indonesia
  2. Salamm, A. (2007). Prospek dan Tantangan Implementasi Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional 2005-2025. Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Pengolahan Data dan Informasi Sekretariat Jendral DPR RI
  3. Lubis, M. Solly. (2000). Politik dan Hukum di Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Mandar Maju
  4. Rahayu, M. (2007). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan: Perjuangan Menghidupi Jati Diri Bangsa. Jakarta: Grasindo
  5. Asshiddiqqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
  6. Sedarmayanti., & Hidayat, Syarifudin. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju
  7. Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2010). Naskah Komperhensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
  8. Anggraini, Yasir., & Ridwan. (2015). Perbandingan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Sebelum Dan Sesudah Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Fiat Justisia, Vol. 9, (No.1), pp. 74-88, p.79
  9. Ansori, L. (2019). Haluan Negara Sebagai Pedoman Kebijakan Dasar Negara Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia: Sebuah Tinjauan Filsafat Kenegaraan.” Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial. Vol. 16, (No.1, Juni), pp. 79-102, p. 81
  10. Arbi, Muhammad H. (2013). UUD-1945 dan GBHN Sebagai Kendali Yuridis Dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Variasi. Vol. 4 (No.12), pp.1-10, p.1
  11. Nugraha, Harry S. (2019) “Urgensi Garis Besar Haluan Negara Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal VeJ, Vol. 5, (No.1, Juni), pp. 191-217, p. 200
  12. Nwauzi, Linus Onyekeozurule., & Akolokwu, Grace. (2019). Evolution of Directive Principles Of State Principle: A Review of The Indian And Nigerian Constitutional Perspectives. Humberside Julia Law Publiser of England and Social Sciences United Kingdom, Vol.9, (No.1), pp. 11- 23, p. 12
  13. Pusterla, Elia R.G. (2015). The Credibility of Sovereignty – The Political Fiction of a Concept. Swiztzerland: Springer International Journal Publishing, Vol.12, (No.2), pp. 98-115, p. 101
  14. Ratnaningsih, E. (2018) Perubahan Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Pakuan Law Review. Vol, 4, (No.1, Januari-Juni), pp. 49-57, p. 51
  15. Subkhan, I. (2014). GBHN dan Perubahan Perencanaan Pembangunan di Indonesia. Jurnal Aspirasi, Vol.5, (No. 2), pp. 131-143, p. 135
  16. Susanto, M. (2017). Wacana Menghidupkan Kembali GBHN Dalam Sistem Presidensil Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, Vol. 17, (No, 3), pp. 433-438, p. 439
  17. Tongat. (2012). Pancasila sebagai Dasar Falsafah Negara dan Makna Filosofisnya dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 41, (No. 3), pp. 399-406, p. 400
  18. Latif, Yudi. (2018). “Rancang Bangun GBHN”, artikel Koran Kompas, 30 Agustus 2016, Diskursus Perihal GBHN & Anotasi Terhadap Praktik Ketatanegaraan Ke Depan Proshiding Focus Group Discussion Ketatanegaraan: Reformulasi Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Model GBHN dan Tata Cara Perubahan UndangUndang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Kerjasama Badan Pengkajian MPR RI dengan Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara wilayah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 8 September 2016
  19. Muhtamar, Syafrudin., Razak, Adulah., & Wahid, M.Yunus. (2016). Relevansi Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Dengan Amanat Konstitusi (Studi Tentang Perbandingan Arah Kebijakan Pembangunan Hukum Dalam GBHN dan RPJPN). Makasar: Universitas Hasanuddin, pp.1-12, p.8
  20. Sundaram, Jomo K. (2006). Growth with Equity in East Asia?. UN DESA Working Paper, Vol 1, (No. 33), pp.21-33, p.23
  21. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN/DESA). (2006). Growth with Equity in East Asia?, DESA Working Paper No. 33. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/esa/ desa/papers /2006/wp 33_2006.pdf

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.