DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41746

Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law

*Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Pretrial is a process that precedes a trial in court or a preliminary examination before entering a trial. However, in its application, pretrial institutions both before and after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 are not in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code and also have weaknesses or shortcomings. This paper aims to find out the presence of pretrial institutions in the perspective of the Pancasila state of law. In other hand, pretrial institution as an institution that oversees the protection of the human rights of suspects/defendants is regulated in Chapter X Articles 77 to Article 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The determination of the suspect must be carried out carefully by taking into account the principle of presumption of innocence as a general principle in criminal procedural law that must be enforced by law enforcers. In law enforcement, of course, there must be supervision both vertically and horizontally so as to minimize the occurrence of irregularities. Therefore, it is important to establish an Ad Hoc institution as a substitute for a Pretrial institution in which the judges consisting of career judges, legal practitioners and academics can act whether there is an application or not which is filed by the suspect/defendant or his family or proxies so that the decision is objective. Thus, it is important to reformulate the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the determination of suspects.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Presence; Pretrial Institution; Pancasila State of Law

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Conceptual Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Legal Protection for Children Victims of Postpartum Depression Crime Combating Policy of Carding in Indonesia in the Political Perspective of Criminal Law Juridical Overview on the Inconsistency of Prohibition to be the Member of Political Parties for the Members of Public Institutions Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law Comparison of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Laws Applied in the United States and Indonesia Securitization of the Merchant Vessels by the Private Contracted Armed Security Personnel: A Legal Perspective More recent articles
Most cited articles
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA COUNTER TERRORISM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME SEBAGAI UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG More cited articles
  1. Aditya, Dita., Yudianto, Ottto., & Setyorini, Erny Herlin. (2020). Kedudukan Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Permohonan Praperadilan. Pajoul; Pakuan Justice Journal Of Law, Vol.1, (No.1), p.63. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/ pajoul/article/view/2084
  2. Anditya, Ariesta W. (2018). Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka Oleh Praperadilan Dalam Konstelasi Pancasila. Justitia Et Pax, Vol.34,(No.1),p.99. https://doi.org/10.24002/ jep.v34i1.1731
  3. Aswandi, Bobi., & Roisah, Kholis. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol.1,(No.1),p.133. https://doi.org/10.14710/ jphi.v1i1.128-145
  4. Hioe, Johny Khoesoema., Gunarto, Anis Mashdurohatun, & Tarigan, Irwan Jasa. (2020). Reconstruction Of Pretial Institution Function In Supervising Investigator Authorization Based On Justice Value With Moderating Role Of Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 9 (No.3, June 2020), p.613. http://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/ IJSCM/article/view/4964
  5. Irsana, Pritamy., Ismail., & Siregar, Emiel Salim. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Praperadilan Terhadap Status Tersangka Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Pionir, Vol.6,(No.1, Januari 2020), p.103. http://www.jurnal. una.ac.id/index.php/pionir/article/view/1065/0
  6. Kusuma, I Made Wisnu Wijaya., & Karma, Ni Made Sukaryati. (2020). Upaya Hukum Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol.1 (No.2, September 2020),pp.75-76. https://doi.org/ 10.22225/juinhum.1.2.2438.73-77
  7. Kusumastuti, E. (2018). Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan, Yuridika, Vol. 3 (Nomor 1, Januari 2018), p.3. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7258
  8. Londah, E. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Tentang Penghentian Penyidikan Atau Penuntutan Dalam Praperadilan Atas Permintaan Pihak Ketiga Menurut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 98/PUU-X/2012. Lex Crimen, Vol.VI, (No.10,Desember2017),p.65. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/18871
  9. Moningka, Paul Eliezer T. (2017).Praperadilan Sebagai Mekanisme Kontrol Terhadap Tindakan Penyidik Dalam Menetapkan Tersangka Menurut Putusan MK Nomor: 21/PUU-XII/2014. Lex Crimen, Vol.6 (No.6), p.8. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/16948
  10. Plangiten, M. (2013). Fungsi dan Wewenang Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, Vol.2 (No.6,Oktober2013),p.3 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/3128
  11. Rahim, A. (2012). Praperadilan Sebagai Control Profesionalisme Kinerja Penyidik. Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu,Vol.5,(No.1),p.2. http://ejurnal.ung. ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/901
  12. Roberts, K. (2019). Perluasan Kewenanagan Praperadilan Sebagai Lembaga Pencari Keadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014. Civitas (Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Civic), Vol.2, (No.1, September 2019),p.78. https://doi.org/10.369 87/civitas.v2i1.1075
  13. Roringkon, Juhady R. (2019). Praperadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014. Lex Administratum, Vol.VII, (No.2, April-Juni 2019), p.37.https://ejournal. unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/26982
  14. Sari, Devi K. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, Vol.1,(No.4),pp.6-7. http://hukum.student journal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1005
  15. Siar, Pratiwi Rhiany. (2019). Politik Hukum Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 98/PUU-X/2012. Lex Administratum, Vol. VII, (No.1/Jan-Mar), p.78. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/24548
  16. Simamora, J. (2014).Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol.14 (No.3, September 2014), p.558. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.318
  17. Wiseman, Samuel R. (2013). Pretrial Detention and the Right to be Monitored. Yale Law Journal, Vol.123,issue5,p.1347. https://ir.law. fsu.edu/articles/458/
  18. Suonpää, Karoliina., Aaltonen, Mikko., & Geest, Viktor van der. (2020). Crime and income trajectories preceding lethal and non-lethal violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol.68, p.9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020. 101685
  19. Dagan, Hanoch. (2015). Doctrinal categories, legal realism, and the rule of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 163, p.1896. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2520891
  20. Cook, Walter Wheeler (1917). Act, intention, and motive in the criminal law. The Yale Law Journal, Vol.26, (No.8), pp.645-663; p.654. https://doi.org/10.2307/786267
  21. Börzel, Tanja A., & Risse, Thomas. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work?. Regulation & Governance, Vol.4, (No.2), p.113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x
  22. Shah, R. (2015). Law enforcement and data privacy-a forward-looking approach. The Yale Law Journal, Vol.125,(No.2),pp.543-558. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/comment/law-enforcement-and-data-privacy-a-forward-looking-approach
  23. Eudy, Parker C. (2018). On Behalf of Each Child: Section 1983 Enforcement of the Right to Foster Care Maintenance Payments under the Child Welfare Act. The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol.85, (No.7),p.1735. https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/publication/%E2%80%9C-behalf-each-child%E2%80%9D-section%C2%A01983-enforcement-right-foster-care-maintenance-payments-0
  24. Stoughton, Seth. (2014). Law enforcement's “warrior” problem. Harvard Law Review, Vol.128, Issue 6,p.226. https://harvardlawreview.org/2015/04/ law-enforcements-warrior-problem/
  25. Situmeang, Sahat Maruli T. (2016). Mencari Keadilan Melalui Upaya Hukum Praperadilan Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Pancasila. Universitas Pasundan
  27. Yuliartha, I Gede. (2009). Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Perspektif Kini dan Masa Mendatang Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Universitas Diponegoro
  28. Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia. Makalah Disampaikan Dalam Forum Dialog Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Yang Diselenggarakan Oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementrian Hukum dan HAM
  29. Marbun, Rocky., Hakim, Abdul, & Sunggara, M. Adystia. (2018). Legal Philosophy Of Pancasila as The Paradigm Of The Criminal Justice System: A Philosophical Critism For The Loss Of a Sense Of Humanity. In SHS Web Of Conferences, Vol. 54 (2018), p.1. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185407001
  30. Erwinsyahbana, Tengku., & Syahbana, Tengku Rizq Frisky. (2018). Perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia Berdasarkan Pancasila. INA-Rxiv Paper. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/cwev7
  31. Barlyan, Nalom K (2020). Penetapan Tersangka & Praperadilan Serta Perbandingannya di Sembilan Negara. Depok: Rajawali Press
  32. Salman, H.R Otje., & Susanto, Anthon F. (2005). Teori Hukum (Mengingat, Mengumpulkan dan Membuka Kembali). Bandung: Refika Aditama
  33. Ravena, Dey., & Kristian. (2017). Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy). Jakarta: Kencana
  34. Setiadi, Edi., & Kristian. (2017). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
  35. Situmeang, Sahat Maruli T. (2019). Penahanan Tersangka Diskresi Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Logoz Publishing
  36. Yanto. (2013). Hukum Komisaris Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Yogyakarta: Kepsel Press
  37. Afandi, F. (2016). Memeriksa Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka atau Menguji Pokok Perkara. Retrievedfrom https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303810888_Memeriksa_Keabsahan_Penetapan_Tersangka_atau_Menguji_pokok_perkara_Telaah_singkat_terhadap_praktik_Pra_peradilan_pasca_Putusan_MK_Nomor_21PUU-XII2014

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-11 16:20:29

No citation recorded.