DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41771

Securitization of the Merchant Vessels by the Private Contracted Armed Security Personnel: A Legal Perspective

*Selo Pasha Purnawarnantha  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Arie Afriansyah scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Shipping trade commodities using commercial ships through the sea that are safe and free from security disturbances is a prerequisite for spinning a country's economy. However, not all seas in this world are safe. There are many areas of waters categorized as high-risk areas. UNCLOS regulates that a safe sea implies that the sea is free from threats or disruptions to the activities of peaceful sea use or utilization, among others, free from threats of violence in the form of piracy, sabotage, and armed terrorism at sea. Conditions gave rise to private security services on board called PCASP (Private Contracted Armed Security Personnel). This article aims to find out how to set up PCASP internationally and according to Indonesian law. This research uses secondary data materials, namely books, journal articles, and papers relevant to this research obtained from print and internet media. The use of PCASP supports the safety and security clause in UNCLOS 1982. IMO as an instrument of the United Nations in charge of maintaining and controlling international regulations on the safety and security of ships and ports. The maritime transportation authority in Indonesia does not require PCASP service nor approves commercial shipping companies to present PCASP on board.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: IMO; Highrisk Area; Private Contracted Armed Security Personnel; UNCLOS, Maritime Security

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Conceptual Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Juridical Overview on the Inconsistency of Prohibition to be the Member of Political Parties for the Members of Public Institutions Crime Combating Policy of Carding in Indonesia in the Political Perspective of Criminal Law Legal Protection for Children Victims of Postpartum Depression Securitization of the Merchant Vessels by the Private Contracted Armed Security Personnel: A Legal Perspective Comparison of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Laws Applied in the United States and Indonesia Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law More recent articles
Most cited articles
COUNTER TERRORISM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME SEBAGAI UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE PENDIDIKAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Akcinaroglu, Seden., & Radziszewski, Elizabeth. (2012). Private Military Companies, Opportunities, and Termination of Civil Wars in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.57, (No.5), pp. 795-821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712449325
  2. Beckman, Robert., & Sun, Zhen (2017). The Relationship between UNCLOS and IMO Instruments. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, Vol.2, (No.2), pp. 201-246. https://doi.org/10.1163/24519391-00202003
  3. Cusumano, Eugenio., & Stefano Ruzza. (2015). Contractors as a Second-Best Option: The Italian Hybrid Approach to Maritime Security. Ocean Development & International Law, Vol.46,(No.2),pp.111-122.DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2015.1024063
  4. Hamza, Farah Robleh., & Priotti, Jean-Philipe. (2020). Maritime Trade and Piracy in the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean (1994–2017). Journal of Transportation Security, Vol.13, pp.141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-018-0190-4
  5. Keliat, M. (2009). Keamanan Maritim dan Implikasi Kebijakannya Bagi Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol.13, (No.1), pp.111-129. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10970
  6. Liss, Carolin., & Schneider, Patricia. (2015). Regulating Private Maritime Security Providers. Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.46,(No.2),pp.81-83.DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2015.1024053
  7. Lehnardt, C. (2008). Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal Law. European Journal of International Law, Vol.19,(No.5),pp.1015-1034. https://doi.org/10. 1093/ejil/chn058
  8. Nevers, Renee de. (2015). State Interests and the Problem of Piracy: Comparing US and UK Approaches to Maritime PMSCs. Ocean Development & International Law, Vol. 46, (No.2),pp.153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00908320.2015.1024068
  9. Malisan, J. (2013). Analisis Implementasi Sistem Pengamanan Kapal Dan Pelabuhan Yang Terbuka Untuk Perdagangan Luar Negeri. Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, Vol.25, (No.3), pp.160-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.25104/warlit. v25i3.717
  10. Priddy, Alice., & Casey-Masle, Stuart. (2012). Counter-piracy Operations by Private Maritime Security Contractors, Key Legal Issues and Challenges. Journal of International Criminal Justice,Vol.10,(No.4),pp.839-856. https://doi. org/10.1093/jicj/mqs057
  11. Preetha, S. (2016). Use of Armed Guards Onboard Ships and Its Legal Ramifications. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India,Vol.58,(No.2),pp.23-27. https://doi.org/ 10.6024/jmbai.2016.58.2.1917-03
  12. Sefriani. (2016). Status Hukum Kontraktor Private Military and Private Security Companies Dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Yustisia,Vol.5,(No.1),pp.94-103. https://doi.org/ 10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8726
  13. Wibawa, Eko Septian Tirta., Sularto, RB., Astuti, AM Endah Sri. (2016). Kebijakan Non Penal Penerapan ISPS Code dalam Pencegahan Tindak Kejahatan di Pelabuhan Tanjung Priok. Diponegoro Law Review, Vol. 5, (No.2). https:// ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/11332
  14. Van Hespen, I. (2014). Protecting Merchant Ships from Maritime Piracy by Privately Contracted Armed Security Personnel: A Comparative Analysis of Flag State Legislation and Port and Coastal State Requirements. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, Vol.45, (No.3), pp.361-400. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8031178
  15. Andreone, G (2017). The Future of the Law of the Sea: Bridging Gaps Between National, Individual and Common Interests. Rome: Springer
  16. Beckman, Robert C. (2009). International Responses to Combat Maritime Terrorism, Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy. Cambridge Unive rsity Press
  17. Mauna, B. (2005). Hukum Internasional, Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global. Bandung: PT. Alumni Carafano
  18. Suranto. (2004). Managemen Operasional Angkutan Laut dan Kepelabuhanan serta Prosedur Impor Barang. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  19. Schechinger, Jessica N M. (2014). Responsibility for Human Rights Violations Arising from the Use of Privately Contracted Armed Security Personnel Against Piracy. Re-emphasizing the Primary Role and Obligations of Flag States. In Editors: Cedric Ryngaert, Erik J. Molenaar, and Sarah Nouwen. (2015). What's Wrong with International Law? Hague: BRILL, pp.30-47
  20. Brown, J. (2012). Pirates and Privateers: Managing the Indian Ocean’s Private Security Boom. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/ stable/resrep10153?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  21. Lombardo, Noah D. (2014). Underreporting of Crimes at Sea: Reasons, Consequences, and Potential Solutions. Retrieved from http://oceansbeyondpiracy.org/
  22. Seper, J. (2014). Blackwater Joins Fight Against Sea Piracy, The Washington Times, 4 December. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes. com
  23. Marine Insight. (2021). 10 Maritime Piracy Affected Areas around the World. Retrieved from https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-piracy-marine/10-maritime-piracy-affected-areas-around-the-world/
  24. Statista. (2021). Number of pirate attacks worldwide 2010-2019, Published by Statista Research Department, Dec1,2020. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/266292/number-of-pirate-attacks-worldwide-since-2006/
  25. Huggins, Jon., & Walje, Matt. (2012). The Challenges of Maritime Private Security Oversight, Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from https://archive.globalpolicy.org/pmscs/52135-the-challenges-of-maritime-private-security-oversight.html
  26. IMO Guidance. (2021). Piracy and armed robbery against ships. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Security/Pages/PiracyArmedRobberydefault.aspx
  27. Kent, Sarah., & Werber, Cassie. (2015). How Floating Armories Help Guard Cargo Ships from Pirates on High Seas. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/ articles/how-floating-armories-help-guard-cargo-ships-from-pirates-on-high-seas-1422934573
  28. Schechinger, Jessica N M. (2015). Flag States, Privately Contracted Armed Security Personnel and Human Rights Violations at Sea. Safe Seas. Retrieved from http://www.safeseas.net/flag-states-privately-contracted-armed-security-personnel-and-human-rights-violations-at-sea/
  29. The State of Maritime Piracy 2013 Report; Oceans Beyond Piracy. (2014). Retrieved from http://oceansbeyondpiracy.org/sites/default/files/attachments/SoP2013-Digital_0.pdf
  30. Surat Edaran yang dikeluarkan oleh Kementerian Perhubungan Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Laut melalui Surat Edaran (Circular Letter) No. UM.002/71/15/DJPL-14 tentang Pengawalan Bersenjata di atas Kapal: Private Contracted Armed Security Pesonnel (PCASP)
  31. UU RI No. 17 tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran
  33. Circular Maritime Safety Committee No. MSC.1/Circ.1405/Rev.2: Revised interim guidance to shipowners, ship operators and shipmasters on the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high-risk area., 25 May 2012
  34. Circular Maritime Safety Committee No. MSC.1/Circ.1406/Rev.2: Revised interim recommendations for flag states regarding the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high-risk area., 12 June 2015
  35. Circular Maritime Safety Committee No. MSC.1/Circ.1408: Interim recommendations for port and coastal states regarding the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high-risk area., 16 September 2011
  36. Circular Maritime Safety Committee No. MSC.1/Circ.1443: Interim guidance to private maritime security companies providing privately contracted armed security personnel on board ships in the high-risk area., 25 May 2012
  37. UNCLOS (United Nation Convention on The Law of The Sea) 1982
  38. Dharmapriya. (2012). Rear Admiral Daya (SLN retd). Countering Maritime Piracy: A South Asian Perspective. Regional Counter-Piracy Workshop. Colombo: Sri Lanka, September 2012
  39. Askins, S. (2012). Creation of New Industrial Standards and Compliance Regulations, Partner at Ince & Company, A Regional Response to Maritime Piracy: Enhancing Public-Private Partnerships and Strengthening Global Engagement A public-private counter-piracy conference co-convened by the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs and DP World

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-20 01:24:21

No citation recorded.