BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LR52851, author = {M. Musa and Sonny Zulhuda and Endri Endri and Heni Susanti and Kasmanto Rinaldi}, title = {Guidelines for Implementing Imprisonment Sentences with Single Formulation (A Critique of Book I of the National Criminal Code)}, journal = {LAW REFORM}, volume = {20}, number = {1}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Sentencing Guidelines; Imprisonment Sentence; Single Formulation}, abstract = { The most basic difference in the criminal system between the Criminal Code (WvS) and the National Criminal Code is the provision of sentencing guidelines. It is important to formulate guidelines for sentencing as a provision to achieve the objectives of punishment because they are related to the formulations of single and alternative penalties for criminal acts in the provisions of the National Criminal Code. This paper aims to conduct a theoretical study on the formulation of the criminal system from the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation contained in Book I of the National Criminal Code, as a general rule that applies to Book II of the National Criminal Code and criminal law out of the National Criminal Code. The results of the study show that the formulation of criminal application guidelines with a single formulation contained in the provisions of Article 57 of the National Criminal Code theoretically does not follow the rules of the criminal system as they should. The provisions of Article 57 are placed in the 3rd paragraph to regulate \"Guidelines for the Implementation of Imprisonment Sentences with a Single Formulation and Alternative Formulations.\" Lawmakers no longer include guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation, as previously existed in the Draft of the National Criminal Code. The consequence of not regulating the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation is that judges cannot make flexible choices in applying sentences that are in accordance with the objectives of the sentence. }, issn = {2580-8508}, pages = {106--134} doi = {10.14710/lr.v20i1.52851}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/lawreform/article/view/52851} }
Refworks Citation Data :
The most basic difference in the criminal system between the Criminal Code (WvS) and the National Criminal Code is the provision of sentencing guidelines. It is important to formulate guidelines for sentencing as a provision to achieve the objectives of punishment because they are related to the formulations of single and alternative penalties for criminal acts in the provisions of the National Criminal Code. This paper aims to conduct a theoretical study on the formulation of the criminal system from the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation contained in Book I of the National Criminal Code, as a general rule that applies to Book II of the National Criminal Code and criminal law out of the National Criminal Code. The results of the study show that the formulation of criminal application guidelines with a single formulation contained in the provisions of Article 57 of the National Criminal Code theoretically does not follow the rules of the criminal system as they should. The provisions of Article 57 are placed in the 3rd paragraph to regulate "Guidelines for the Implementation of Imprisonment Sentences with a Single Formulation and Alternative Formulations." Lawmakers no longer include guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation, as previously existed in the Draft of the National Criminal Code. The consequence of not regulating the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation is that judges cannot make flexible choices in applying sentences that are in accordance with the objectives of the sentence.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-06-29 09:25:36
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Law Reform and Master Program of Law, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Law Reform and Master Program of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Law Reform journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Law Reform]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document or fax :
Dr. Kholis Roisah, S.H., M.Hum (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Law Reform
Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Imam Bardjo, SH No.1, Semarang, Indonesia 50241
Telp. (024) 8313493
Email: jurnalmih.undip@gmail.com
Has been indexed in:
Statistics
LAW REFORM (p-ISSN:1858-4810, e-ISSN:2580-8508) is published by Master Program of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
