DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.61779

Optimizing the Role of State Administrative Court Decisions in State Financial Recovery

*Yulius Yulius  -  Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia., Indonesia
Yos Johan Utama scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The government has significant authority in managing state finances, demonstrated by its ability to enact laws and to take public legal action through government decisions and actions. A number of authorities are inextricably linked to the measures taken to ensure that state finance can fund all state expenditures related to achieving development goals. This considerable power may violate citizens' rights due to the decisions or actions of the state finance manager. The community whose rights are jeopardized may file a lawsuit or petition the Administrative Court. The Administrative Court Decision must be able to synthesize public demands with the stability of the state finance to ensure that justice and legal order are fulfilled for the benefit of the state and people. This research is a normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. This research concludes that the Administrative Court decision has enforced the law and harmonized and actualized the national legal system regarding state finances. It is also highly correlated with state financial stability because its value is immense and can affect the state's cash balance.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: State Finance, Decision, State Administrative Court.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Optimizing the Role of State Administrative Court Decisions in State Financial Recovery Environmental Damage: Community Lawsuit Against The Government Over Industrial Business Licenses Incongruence in the Definition of Land Rights in National Agrarian Law: A Path to Legal Uncertainty More recent articles
Most cited articles
KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PENDIDIKAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA More cited articles
  1. Aedi, Ahmad Ulil. & Samekto, FX Adji. (2013). Rekonstruksi Asas Kesamaan Di Hadapan Hukum (Equality Before The Law) (Suatu Kajian Khusus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Perkara 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum). LAW REFORM,Vol.8,(No.2),pp.1-19. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v8i2.12421
  2. A’in, Aprilianita Khusnul., & Ispriyarso, Budi. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Akibat Perubahan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan (Pbb) Dari Pajak Pusat Menjadi Pajak Daerah Terhadap Daerah Tertinggal (Studi Di Kabupaten Situbondo Provinsi Jawa Timur). LAW REFORM, Vol.11, (No.1), pp.1-11. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i1. 15754
  3. Boulanger, C. (2020). The Comparative Sociology of Legal Doctrine: Thoughts on a Research Program. German Law Journal, Vol.21,(No.7),pp.1362-1377. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.80
  4. Darmawan, A. (2014). Politik Hukum Penguatan Desentralisasi dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fiat Justitia, Vol.8, (No.1), pp.114-138. https://doi.org/10.25041/ fiatjustisia.v8no1.281
  5. Dent, C. (2017). A law Student-Oriented Taxonomy for Research in Law. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, Vol.48,(No.2),pp.371-388. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4748
  6. Syam, Fauzi., Satoto, Sukamto., Helmi. (2023). Politik Hukum Pemberian Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Pengujian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Undang: Jurnal Hukum,Vol.6 (No.1),pp.89-233.DOI: 10.22437/ujh.6.1.189-233
  7. Firdaus, Aras., Syaputra, Muhammad Yusrizal Adi., & Dirkareshza, Rianda . (2022). Optimalisasi Good Corporate Governance Penguatan BUMN dalam Perlindungan Keuangan Negara. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, Vol.1,(No.1),pp.96-111. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v1i1.8317
  8. Juliani, H. (2021) Peranan Pinjaman Luar Negeri Dalam Mengatasi Defisit Anggaran Negara. Administrative Law & Governance Journal, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.294-312. https://doi.org/10. 14710/alj.v4i2.294%20-%20312
  9. Umar, H. (2011). Government Financial Management, Strategy for Preventing Corruption in Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management, Vol.5, (No.1). DOI: 10.21002/seam.v5i1.1793
  10. Illahi, Beni Kurnia., & Alia, Muhammad Ikhsan. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Melalui Kerja Sama BPK dan KPK. Jurnal Integritas, Vol.3, (No.2),pp.37-78. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i2.102
  11. Kusnandar, Mas Iman., & Pratiwi, Refi. (2021). The State Financial System as a Main Element of Implementing Regional Government in The Unitary State. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, Vol.1,(No.2),pp.121–133. https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i2.20
  12. Ishak, Nurfaika., Hasibuan, Rahmad R., & Arbani, Tri Suhendra. (2020). Bureaucratic and Political Collaboration Towards a Good Governance System. Jurnal Bestuur, Vol.8, (No.1),pp.19-26. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42922
  13. Junaenah, I. (2016). Tafsir Konstitusional Pengujian Peraturan di Bawah Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.3, (No.3), pp.503-529. https://doi.org/10.31078/ jk1332
  14. Keller, H. (2023). How to Improve Independence and Impartiality of Judges of the European Court of Human Rights. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol.4,(No.3),pp.259-266. https:// doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10068
  15. Lestari, R. (2013). Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum FH Universitas Riau, Vol.4, (No2), pp.217-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i2.1819
  16. Novikasari, Siti Rahma., Ly, Duc Quang., & Gershaneck, Kerry. (2021). Taxing Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in Yogyakarta: Regulation and Compliance. Jurnal Bestuur, Vol.9, (No.1), pp.43-52. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49184
  17. Palil, Mohd Rizal., Ismail, Ida Suriya., Zain, Nor Hazila Mohd., & Bakar, M.A. Anwar Abu. (2021). Social Enterprise and Taxation Policy: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Bestuur, Vol.9, (No.2), pp.135-143. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i2.55569
  18. Panjaitan, M. (2018). Penyelesaian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Negara Menurut Hukum Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Vol.24,(No.3), pp.431–447. https://doi.org/10.20885/ iustum.vol24.iss3.art5
  19. Putra, F.A. Satria. (2021). Problem Eksekutorial Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. JUSTISI, Vol.7,(No.1),pp.66–75. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v7i1.1201
  20. Putrijanti, A. (2020). The Competence of Administrative Court and Administrative Justice. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.14,(No.2),pp.97-112. https://doi.org/10. 25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1890
  21. Putrijanti, Aju., & Leonard, Lapon Tukan. (2019). Kompetensi Peratun Untuk Memeriksa Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, Vol.7,(No.1),pp.107–127. https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/605
  22. Ristriawan, Hendar., & Sugiharti, Dewi Kania. (2017). Penguatan Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Melalui Mekanisme Checks and Balances System. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.14, (No.2),pp.601-619. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1437
  23. Riza, D. (2018). Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Undang-Undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol.3,(No.1),pp.85-102. http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jbmh/article/view/109
  24. Rofingi., Rozah, Umi., & Asga, Adifyan Rahmat. (2022). Problems of Law Enforcement in Realizing The Principle of Equality Before The Law in Indonesia. LAW REFORM, Vol.18,(No.2),pp.222-237. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i2.47477
  25. Simbolon, Bob H. (2022). Pengujian Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Dharmasisya; Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FH UI, Vol.2, Article 26
  26. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/26
  27. Soehartono., Tejomurti ,Kukuh., Aldyan, Arsyad., & Indriyani, Rachma. (2021). The Establishing Paradigm of Dominus Litis Principle in Indonesian Administrative Justice. Sriwijaya Law Review, Vol.5 Issue 1 January 2021, pp.42–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss1.877.pp42-55
  28. Sorik, Sutan., & Dwiatmoko, Anang (2022). Perdebatan Teoritis Terhadap Perluasan Ruang Lingkup Keuangan Negara Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol.52,(No.2),Article5. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol52/iss2/5
  29. Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus., Karunian, Alifa Yofira., Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2022). Discourses on Citizen Lawsuit as Administrative Dispute Object: Government Administration Law vs. Administrative Court Law. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, Vol.7, (No.2), pp.499-486. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60166
  30. Suhaimi. (2018). Problem Hukum dan Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jurnal Yustitia, Vol.19, (No.2), pp.202-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.53712/ yustitia.v19i2.477
  31. Suhardi, I. (2016). Penyatuan Hukum Pajak Formal Dalam Sistem Hukum Pajak Nasional. Jurnal Yuridika, Vol.31,(No.1), pp.27-57. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i1.1960
  32. Suparman, E. (2014). Korupsi Yudisial (Judicial Corruption) dan KKN di Indonesia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.1, (No.2),pp.209-227. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n2.a1
  33. Weda, Ni Komang Dewi Novita Indriyani., Arjaya, I. Made., & Seputra, I. Putu Gede. (2021). Penerapan Asas Hakim Aktif (Dominus Litis) dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan No.1/G/2017/PTUN.DPS.). Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol.2, (No.1), pp.27-32. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3048.27-32
  34. Wijaya, Hana N. (2021). Pengadilan Khusus di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Komparatif USA Tax Court). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, Vol.5, (No.4), pp.1647-1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i4.2604
  35. Acemoglu, Daron., & Robinson, James. (2017). Mengapa Negara Gagal: Awal Mula Kekuasaan, Kemakmuran dan Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Gramedia
  36. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2023. Jakarta: Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan
  37. Fukuyama, F. (2005). Memperkuat Negara: Tata Pemerintahan dan Tata Dunia Abad 21. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  38. Hadiyanto. (2022). Hukum Keuangan Negara Di Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Depok: Rajawali Pers
  39. Hadjon, Philipus M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu
  40. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Tahunan 2023. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung
  41. McLeod, I. (2003). Legal Theory. Second Edition. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  42. Simatupang, Dian Puji N. (2011). Paradoks Rasionalitas Perluasan Ruang Lingkup Keuangan Negara Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FH-UI
  43. Sugianto, F. (2013). Economic Analysis Of Law (Seri I: Pengantar). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
  44. Government Regulations in Lieu of Law No. 49 of 1960 concerning the State Receivables Affairs Committee
  45. Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance
  46. Law Number 15 of 2004 concerning Audit of State Financial Management and Responsibility
  47. Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts as amended several times, most recently by Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts
  48. Government Regulation No. 28 of 2022 on the Management of State Receivables by the State Receivables Affairs Committee

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-27 02:17:44

No citation recorded.