DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i2.64129

Discretion of Government Officials Detrimental to State Finances: The Intersection Between Administrative Illegality and Criminal Illegality

*Wahbi Rahman orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Sudarsono Sudarsono orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Prija Djatmika orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Abdul Madjid orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Rehulina Rehulina scopus  -  Géza MartonDoctoral School of Legal Studies University of Debrecen, Hungary
Open Access Copyright 2024 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The regulation of the criminal accountability system for discretion that causes state losses is governed by Law Number 31 of 1999, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption. This law includes the element of "abusing authority, opportunity, or means available due to one's position or rank that may cause state financial losses," which can lead to criminal punishment. Additionally, Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration also regulates the imposition of administrative sanctions. The purpose of this research is to analyze the priority mechanism when there is an overlap between administrative and criminal illegality in cases of discretion by government officials that result in state financial losses. This research employs a normative legal method. The findings suggest that, according to current legislation, when a case involves overlapping issues between the Corruption Law and the Government Administration Law, priority should be given to administrative measures based on the Government Administration Law. This approach is aimed at improving orderly government administration and preventing abuse of authority.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Discretion; State Financial Losses; Criminal Acts

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Legal Mechanisms for Business Accountability: A Comparison of Soft and Hard Law in Indonesia Compulsory Testament: State Intervention in the Protection and Fulfillment of Human Rights of Non-Muslim Heirs Problems of Legal Implementation of the Criminal Offense of Spreading Fake News and Hate Speech in Papua More recent articles
Most cited articles
KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE COUNTER TERRORISM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME SEBAGAI UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG More cited articles
  1. Budiyono., Prayitno, Kuat Puji., Hendriana, Rani., & Sukirman. (2022) Non-Penal Policy In Managing Criminal Acts Of Bribery And Nepotism Corruption. International Journal of Advance Research, Vol.10, (No.7), pp.302-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/15034
  2. Bunga, Marten., Maroa, Mustating Dg., Arief, Amelia., & Djanggih, Hardianto. (2019). Urgensi peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Reform, Vol.15,(No.1),pp.85-97. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23356
  3. Darojad, Z. (2018). Penggunaan Diskresi Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Yang Mengakibatkan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal MP (Manajemen Pemerintahan), Vol.5,(No.2),pp.125-140. https://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/JMP/article/view/435
  4. Edyanti, Yusrin., & Erliyana, Anna. (2022). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Penguasa (Onrechtmatige Overheisdaad) (Suatu Tinjauan Analisis Administrasi Pemerintahan). Dharmasisya, Vol.2, (No.2),pp.719-734. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/14
  5. Endang, M. Ikbar A. (2018). Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan Discretion And Responsbility Of Government Officials Based On Law Of State Administration. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol.1,(No.2), pp. 223–244. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.122018.223-244
  6. Faisal, Fitriah., Jamaluddin, Fitriani., Rahman, Hasima., & Tarta, Ahmad Firman. (2021). Diskresi Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Pidana. Mulawarman Law Review, Vol.6, (No.1), pp.32-41. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v6i1.466
  7. Farahwati. (2021). Peran Aktif Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Merupakan Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Legalitas; Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol.6,(No.2),pp.28-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.31293/lg.v6i2.5864
  8. Fasyehhudin, M. (2023). Freies Ermessen Dalam Tindakan Nyata di Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Vol.8,(No.1), pp.69-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i1.6250
  9. Guslan, Odie F. (2018). Batasan Antara Perbuatan Maladministrasi Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Riau Law Journal, Vol.2, (No.2), pp.138-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v2i2.4942
  10. Hadiyanto, A. (2022). Pelaksanaan Dan Penerapan Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materil Dalam Perundang-Undangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Petita, Vol.4, (No.2), pp.160-174. https://doi.org/10.33373/pta.v4i2.4969
  11. Howe, Louis E. (2002). Administrative Law and Governmentality: Politics and Discretion in a Changing State of Sovereignty. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol.24 (No.1), pp.55–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2002.11029340
  12. HR, Ridwan. (2003). Pertanggungjawaban Publik Pemerintah dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum,Vol.10,(No.22),pp.27-38. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/4770
  13. Irawan, Beni., Firdaus., Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Taufiqurrohman, A. H. Asari., and Sari, Siti Wulan. (2024). State Responsibility and Strategy in Preventing and Protecting Indonesian Fisheries Crews Working on Foreign Fishing Vessels from Modern Slavery.” Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2333107
  14. Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Ridwan., Mucharom, Rully Syahrul., Wibowo, Dwi Edi., Aisah, Siti Nur., Sulastri., & Alifvia, Novia Bela. (2023). Criticising the Implementation of the ACTIP in Southeast Asia. Sriwijaya Law Review, Vol.7, (No.2), pp.355-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2542.pp350-367
  15. Lytvyn, Nataliia A., Artemenko, Olena V., Kovalova, Svitlana S., Kobets, Maryna P., & Kashtan, Elena V. (Grygorieva). (2023). Administrative And Legal Mechanisms For Combating Corruption. Journal of Financial Crime,Vol.30,(No.1),pp.154-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2021-0241
  16. Malian, S. (2020). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Jabatan Oleh Pejabat Negara/Pemerintah: Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, Vol.20,(No.1),pp.102-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v20i1.5363
  17. McCabe, Barbara Coyle., & Nank, Renee. (2022). Design and Implementation of Legislation: The Role of Discretion. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. pp.3116–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2520
  18. Wahyu MJ, Stefanus., M A, Fernanda., Triwardani, Satya., Puspita S, Dwi., & Fattah, Hidayatul. (2023). Peran Politik Hukum Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Wijayakusuma Law Review, Vol.5, (No.1), pp 8-13 https://doi.org/10.51921/wlr.v5i1.229
  19. Muhsin, Mustika S. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Diskresi Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, Vol.7, (No.3), pp.57-64 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/27934
  20. Nikolaienko, Andrii., Nikolaienko, Oleksii., Avanesov, Hryhorii., Koshmal, Serhii., & Lukashuk, Oksana. (2024). Corruption as a Threat to National Security: Analysis of Anti-corruption Mechanisms and their Effectiveness. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), Vol.69 (Special Issue), pp.23-31. DOI: 10.46852/0424-2513.1.2024.4
  21. Ningrum, Anak Aagung Anggy Tryeza Purnama., & Darmadi, AA Ngurah Oka Yudistira. (2021). Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Berdasarkan Analisis Ekonomi Mikro. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.10,(No.3),pp.252-261. https://doi.org/10.24843/KW.2021.v10.i03.p06
  22. Nuna, Muten., & Marthen, Roy. (2019). Kebebasan Hak Sosial-Politik Dan Partisipasi Warganegaradalam Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.110-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1652
  23. Panjaitan, Saut P. (2016). Makna Dan Peranan Freies Ermessen Dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Unisia, Vol.07, (No.20), pp.53-60. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Unisia/article/view/5165
  24. Purnomo, M. Aris., & Soponyono, Eko. (2015). Rekonseptualisasi penyidikan tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Polri Dalam Rangka Efektifitas Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Reform, Vol.11, (No.2), pp.230-240. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i2.15771
  25. Rakia, A. Sakti R. S. (2021). Perkembangan Dan Urgensi Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Pasca Penetapan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, Vol.2,(No.2), pp.157-173. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.106
  26. Ridwan., Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., & Imani, Sarah Haderizqi. (2022). The Implementation of General Principles of Convention on The Rights of The Child During Covid-19 Pandemic in The City of Serang. Law Reform, Vol.18,(No.1), pp. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.44643
  27. Robinson, Paul H. (1988). Legality and Discretion in the Distribution of Criminal Sanctions. Harvard Journal of Legislation, Vol.25, (No.393),pp.393-460. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/619
  28. Sahlan, M. (2016). Unsur Menyalahgunakan Kewenangan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Administrasi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum,Vol.23,(No.2),pp.271-293. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art6
  29. Sihotang, Githa Angela., Pujiyono., & Sa’adah, Nabitatus. (2017), Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Publik Pada pelaksanaan tugas Dalam Situasi Darurat. Law Reform, Vol.13,(No.1), pp.60-69. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15951
  30. Suprayoga, Bima., Hartiwiningsih., & Rustamaji, Muhammad. (2023). Reconstruction Of State Economic Losses In Criminal Acts Of Corruption In Indonesia. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, Vol.17, (No.4), pp.1-15. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n4-024
  31. Wedha, Yogi Yasa., & Nurcahyo, Edy. (2021). Criminal Law Reform Toward Deprivation Of Property Resulting From Corruption Criminal Acts: A Criminological Perspective. Prizren Social Scince Journal, Vol.5,(No.1),pp.97-103. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v5i1.207
  32. Wahyudi, S. (2019). Penal Policy on Assets Recovery on Corruption Cases in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies (JILS), Vol.4, (No.01), pp.45-72. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.28224
  33. Wangga, Maria Silvya E., Pujiyono., & Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2019). Revocation Of Political Rights Of The Perpetrators Of Criminal Acts of Corruption. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies (JILS), Vol.4, (No.2),pp.277-298. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i2.29689
  34. Wasahua, Idris., Istislam., Madjid, Abdul., & Widagdo, Setyo. (2021). Legal Implications Of The Criminal Policy Of Returning State Financial Losses By Corporations In Corruption Criminal Acts To Restore State Financial Losses. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, Vol.10, (No. 8).pp.298–303. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1464
  35. Yulius., & Utama,Yos Johan. (2024). Optimizing the Role of State Administrative Court Decisions in State Financial Recovery. Law Reform,Vol.20,(No.1),pp.34-53. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.61779
  36. Yulius. (2015). Perkembangan Pemikiran dan Pengaturan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Indonesia (Tinjauan Singkat Dari Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol.4,(No.3),pp.361-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.3.2015.361-384
  37. Adjie, Indriyanto S. (2016). Korupsi : Kriminalisasi Kebijakan atau Kebebasan Diskresioner?. Presented at the Technical Working Meeting of the Special Crimes Division 2016, with the theme "Criminal Acts and Criminal Liability”. Jakarta: The Jampidsus Building, Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia
  38. Arief, Barda N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Grup
  39. Hamzah, A. (1986). Korupsi di Indonesia : Masalah dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: PT Gramedia
  40. Heofnagels, G.P. (1973). The Other Side Of Criminology. Holland: Kluwer Deventer
  41. HR, Ridwan. (2014). Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press
  42. Marbun, S.F. (2013). Hukum Administrasi Negara II. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press
  43. Muchsan. (1992). Sistem Pengawasan terhadap Perbuatan Aparat Pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty
  44. Act C of 2012 on the Hungary Criminal Code. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4c358dd22.pdf
  45. Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1999 Number 140, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3874)
  46. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2001 Number 134, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4150)
  47. Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 Number 47, Supplement to State Gazette Number 4286)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-19 20:00:58

No citation recorded.