DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v21i1.64666

Patents at the Crossroads: Legal Pathways for Advancing Technology Transfer in Indonesia

*Agung Sujatmiko orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Mochamad Kevin Romadhona orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Yuniar Rizky Saraswati orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Open Access Copyright 2025 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Indonesia needs technology for industrial infrastructure, but it is still controlled by developed countries. Patent licensing agreements can help facilitate this process. However, Indonesia's patent registrations are slow due to a lack of regulations and internal factors.This study aims to analyze the role of patent licensing in transferring technology from developed to developing countries. Patent license agreements play a crucial role as a mechanism for technological development. Therefore, it is essential to find solutions to ensure an effective transfer of technology.This research employs a statutory and conceptual approach. The analysis follows a deductive method by examining general laws and regulations before drawing conclusions.The results show that several regulations related to technology transfer serve as the main reference for understanding why technology transfer is difficult to achieve and identifying its underlying causes. Once these causes are identified, appropriate solutions can be proposed. The lack of regulations in Indonesia’s legal framework for technology transfer hinders its full potential. In conclusion, Indonesia's technology transfer laws have not been effective due to the absence of clear implementation guidelines and strict penalties. Therefore, a specific law regulating technology transfer is needed, emphasizing its importance and benefits while ensuring a strong commitment from all relevant parties.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Patent License; Technology Transfer; Indonesia Law; Working Patent Contract
Funding: None

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Concept of Plea Bargain in the Criminal Process System in Indonesia The Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence Technology Systems in Banking Fraud Patents at the Crossroads: Legal Pathways for Advancing Technology Transfer in Indonesia Avoiding Misunderstandings About the Emergence and Position of Grundnorm as a Source of Law More recent articles
Most cited articles
KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Anawalt, H. (1989). To License Or Not - A Proposal to Improve Patent Law. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, Vol.5, Issue2,p.199. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/ vol5/iss2/1/
  2. Anokhin, Sergey., Wincent, Joakim., & Frishammar, Johan. (2011). A Conceptual Framework for Misfit Technology Commercialization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.78, (No.6),pp.1060–1071. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.techfore.2010.12.005
  3. Ariyesti, Fitri Reni., Ghufran, Muhammad., Ali, Sufran., & Marwadani. (2022). The Systematic Review of The Functionality of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia. Journal of Public Affairs, Vol.22, (No.2). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2482
  4. Asmoro, Puspa K. (2017). Technology transfer in Indonesian State Universities: Do IPRS Play a Significant Role. Indonesia Law Review,Vol.7,(No.1),p.49. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v7n1. 291
  5. Barizah, N. (2021). International Patent Law and Its Implementation in Indonesia: Can It Facilitate Technology Transfer?. Journal of Nusantara Studies-Jonus, Vol.6, (No.1), pp.156–175. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1892-9187
  6. Benoit, E. (1978). Growth and Defense in Developing Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol.26,(No.2),pp.271–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/451015
  7. Bodó, Balázs., Gervais, Daniel., & Quintais, João. Pedro. (2018). Blockchain and smart contracts: the missing link in copyright licensing?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol.26, (No.4), pp.311–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eay014
  8. Budi, V Hendry Soelistyo. (2019). Policy Study In Indonesia’s Patent Legal System. Law Reform,Vol.15,(No.2),pp.206–224. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i2.26179
  9. Budi, V Henry Soelistyo, Girodon-Hutagalung, Matahari., & Irawati, Jovita. (2024). Integrating IPR Integrity and Freedom of Expression: A Normative Analysis. Law Reform,Vol.20,(No.1),pp.153–169. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.62089
  10. Busroh, Firman F. (2018). Assessing the Role of IPR Legislations for Technology, Innovation and Economic Growth in Indonesia. International Journal of Management and Business Research,Vol.8,(No.3),pp.227–236. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330181179_ Assessing_the_Role_of_IPR_Legislations_for_Technology_Innovation_and_Economic_Growth_in_Indonesia#full-text
  11. Butt, S. (2014). The position of international law within the Indonesian legal system. Emory International Law Review, Vol.28, (No.1). https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/ vol28/iss1/1
  12. Da Silva, Vander Luiz., Kovaleski, João Luiz., & Pagani, Regina Negri. (2019). Technology transfer in the supply chain oriented to industry 4.0: a literature review. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.31,(No.5),pp.546–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1524135
  13. Dewi, Niken Sari., & Suteki, Suteki. (2017). Obstruksi Pelaksanaan Lisensi Wajib Paten Dalam Rangka Alih Teknologi Pada Perusahaan Farmasi Di Indonesia. Law Reform,Vol.13,(No.1),pp.1–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15947
  14. Dias, Alexander Aparecido., & Porto, Geciane Silveira. (2018). Technology transfer management in the context of a developing country: evidence from Brazilian universities. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, Vol.16, (No.4), pp.525–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778 238.2018. 1514288
  15. Dung, Nguyen Trung., Tri, Nguyen Minh., & Minh, Le Nho. (2021). Digital transformation meets national development requirements. Linguistics and Culture Review, Vol.5(S2), pp.892–905. https://doi.org/10.21744/ lingcure.v5nS2.1536
  16. Ellitan, L. (2020). Competing in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, Vol.10, (No.1),pp.1–12. https://doi.org/10.30588/ jmp.v10i1.657
  17. Faujura, Rahmanisa Purnamasari., Gultom, Elisatris., & Sudjana, Sudjana. (2021). The monopoly practice and unfair business competition in the technology transfer activity through the foreign patent in Indonesia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.12,(No.1),pp.69–91. https://e-journal. uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/uumjls2021.12.1.4
  18. Geofrey, Maharo Jean Claude., & Roisah, Kholis. (2020). Patenting Deal in Indonesia, Article 20 of The Patent Law in The Political Perspective of International Trade Law. Law Reform, Vol.16, (No.1), pp.19–31. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i1.30302
  19. Goldman, L. (1991). My Way and the Highway: The Law and Economics of Choice of Forum Clauses in Consumer Form Contracts. Northwesters University Law Review,Vol.86,(No.3). https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/illlr86&div=25&id=&page=
  20. Göktepe-Hulten, Devrim., & Mahagaonkar, Prashanth. (2010). Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation?. Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.35, pp.401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9126-2
  21. Guo, Jonathan., & Li, Bin. (2018). The application of medical artificial intelligence technology in rural areas of developing countries. Health Equity, Vol.2, (No.1), pp.174–181. https://doi.org/10.1089/ heq.2018.0037
  22. Haugen, Hans M. (2021). Does TRIPS (Agreement on Trade‐Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) prevent COVID‐19 vaccines as a global public good?. Journal of World Intellectual Property,Vol.24,(No.3–4),pp.195–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12187
  23. Deswandri, Deswandri., He, Yan., Dewi, Dharu., Weiwei, Qi., Taryo, Taswanda., Jun, Sun., Yuliang, Sun., Santoso, Sigit, & Bakhri, Syaiful. (2022). Mapping of the potential involvement of national companies to fulfilment of local content requirements in HTGR construction projects in Indonesia. Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol.398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111960
  24. Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development?. Journal of International Development, Vol.22, (No.5), pp.625–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid. 1716
  25. Hidayat, Ahmad., & Virgianita, Asra. (2019). Technical assistance for innovation development from and to developing country: Case study of Indonesia’s foreign aid to Timor-Leste. International Journal of Development Issues, Vol.18,(No3),pp.353–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-11-2018-0184
  26. Hong, Jongyi., Cha, Jeonghwa, G, Bilegjargal., & Park, Kyungbo. (2023). Evaluation framework for facilitating the technology transfers of universities: Focusing on the perspective of technology donors. PLOS ONE,Vol.18,(No.12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293951
  27. Hutauruk, Dwi Eryka Happy K. (2022). Technology Transfer, Investment and Indonesian Patent Law. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), Vol.6, (No.2), pp.3626-3636. http://dx.doi.org/10.582 58/jisip.v6i2.2842
  28. Irawan, C. (2019). Pengaturan Alih Teknologi Pada Kegiatan Penanaman Modal Untuk Percepatan Penguasaan Teknologi Di Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, Vol.28,(No.1),pp.71–82. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.28.1.71-82
  29. Khairandy, R. (2016). Praktek Perdagangan Restriktif dalam Pengalihan Teknologi Melalui Kontrak Lisensi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Vol.3, (No.5), pp.16–27. https://doi.org/10.20885/ iustum.vol3.iss5.art3
  30. Kumar, Vinod., Kumar, Umar., & Persaud, Aditha. (1999). Building technological capability through importing technology: the case of Indonesian manufacturing industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.24, (No.1), pp.81–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007728921126
  31. Kuswartojo, Tjuk. (2002). Agenda 21, GEF dan Alih Teknologi. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan,Vol.3,(No.3). DOI: 10.29122/jtl.v3i3.252
  32. Larasati, Nadia Utami., Munabari, Fahlesa., & Sumarwan, Untung. (2022). Prison Overcrowding: Alternative Sentencing in Indonesia’s Draft Criminal Code and Its Consequences on Correctional System. Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, Vol.6,(No.1),pp.42–61. https://doi.org/10.24843/ UJLC.2021.v06.i01.p03
  33. Leonard, Tommy., Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriyan.i, Heriyati, Heriyati., Karjoko, Lego., & Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi (2020). Legal review of share ownership in a joint venture company. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change,Vol.11,(No.8),pp.332–345. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol11iss8/11825_Leonard_2020_E_R.pdf
  34. Lin, Shiue-Hung., & Wu, Leslie. (2022). Intellectual property rights and law enforcement in developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol.35, (No.1), pp.143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1889390
  35. Maskus, Keith E. (2001). Intellectual property challenges for developing countries: An economic perspective. University of Illinois. Law Review, Vol.457. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage ?handle=hein.journals/unilllr2001&div=21&id=&page=
  36. Masrur, Devica Rully., Yulia, Yulia., Zainol, Zinatul Ashiqin., & Akpoviri, Frank I. (2024). Biopiracy and the Regulatory Framework for Material Transfer Agreements in Indonesia. Law Reform, Vol.20, (No.1), pp.76–105. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.57001
  37. Meghani, Z. (2021). Regulations Matter: Epistemic Monopoly, Domination, Patents, and the Public Interest. Philosophy & Technology, Vol.34,(No.4),pp.1449–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00467-2
  38. Morah, Erasmus U. (1996). Obstacles to optimal policy implementation in developing countries. Third World Planning Review, Vol.18,(No.1),p.79. https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.18.1.t150u232kqt726q
  39. Moser, Petra., & Voena, Alessandra. (2012). Compulsory licensing: Evidence from the trading with the enemy act. American Economic Review, Vol.102, (No.1), pp.396–427. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.1.396
  40. Mubarok, R. (2016). Alih teknologi melalui perjanjian lisensi kaitannya dengan undang-undang nomor 14 tahun 2001 tentang paten. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol.5,(No.1). http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/hdm.v5i1.299
  41. Pandey, Nimisha., de Coninck, Heleen., & Sagar, Ambuj D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Vol.11, (No.2). https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.422
  42. Perdana, S. (2021). Comparison of government efforts in improving the welfare of Indonesian workers based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning manpower and Draft Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), Vol.2,(No.1), pp.35–44. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i1.85
  43. Pitkethly, Robert H. (2001). Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies: patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities. Research Policy, Vol.30, (No.3),pp.425–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)0 0084-6
  44. Prasetiyo, Reinandus B. (2020). Perkembangan Aspek Hukum Alih Teknologi Di Indonesia. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, Vol.14, (No.2),pp.108–135. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v15i2. 1822
  45. Purwaningsih, E. (2020). Patent Law and Its Enforcement in Indonesia, Japan and the USA. Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol.27, (No.1), pp.1–22. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20200138
  46. Quoc, Nguyen P. (2020). Impacts of IPRS basic provisions in CPTPP on technology transfer and innovation-suggestion in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, Vol.18, (No.4). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol18.4.819
  47. Rahayu, Roisah, Kholis., Ramadhan, Diastama Anggita., & Suryani, Leony Sondang. (2023). Fulfillment of public health access post amendment to law number 13 of 2016 on patents. AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol.2722. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142994
  48. Reichman, Jerome H. (2009). Comment: compulsory licensing of patented pharmaceutical inventions: evaluating the options. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol.37,(No.2),pp.247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00369.x
  49. Rochel, J. (2020). Intellectual property and its foundations: Using Art. 7 and 8 to address the legitimacy of the TRIPS. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol.23,(No.1–2),pp.21–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12138
  50. Roh, Taewoo,, Lee, Kangmun,, & Yang, Ji Yeon. (2021). How do intellectual property rights and government support drive a firm’s green innovation? The mediating role of open innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production,Vol.317. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2021.128422
  51. Roisah, K. (2015). Kebijakan Hukum “Tranferability” Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Law Reform,Vol.11,(No.2),pp.241–254. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr. v11i2.15772
  52. Roisah, Kholis., Rahayu, Rahayu., Darminto, Darminto., Zainol, Zinatul Ashiqin., & Suryani, Leony Sondang. (2022). Governance and Regulation of Local Working Requirement And Importation: Pharmaceutical Industry Study. Journal of Governance and Regulation, Vol.11, (No.3),pp.61–69. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i3art6
  53. Roisah, Kholis., Rahayu, Rahayu., & Rachmanda, Diaz. (2023). The Working Patent and Pharmaceutical Industry Development in Indonesia. Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.21,(No.1),pp.304–315. https://doi.org/10.55365/1923.x2023.21.29
  54. Romadhona, Mochamad K. (2022). Does the Pandemic Affect Unemployment Rate in East Java? (A Study of Pre and Post COVID-19 Pandemic in 2016 to 2021). The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, Vol.3, (No.2), pp.164–176. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep. v3i2.308
  55. Septihana, Anisa Ribut., & Cahyarini, Luluk Lusiati. (2022). Legal-Political Study of the Job Creation Law on Revocation of Article 20 of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents. Borobudur Law Review, Vol.4, (No.1),pp.13–23. https://journal.unimma.ac.id/index.php/burrev/article/view/7082
  56. Thalib, A. (2014). Technology Transfer in Indonesia: Legal Perspective. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.5, pp.69–85. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/4579
  57. Thalib, A. (2016). Technology Transfer In Indonesia And China: A Comparative Study. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol.23,(No.2),pp.251–270. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art5
  58. Thalib, Nur Aisyah., Santoso, Budi., & Prananingtyas, Paramita. (2019). Problematika Ketentuan Alih Teknologi Melalui Lisensi Paten Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol.8, (No.2), pp.1374–1383. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/25466
  59. Trisnawati, B. (2016). Dampak Klausula Kontrak Lisensi Paten Terhadap Program Alih Teknologi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol.7, (No.2). http://dx.doi.org/10.56444/hdm. v7i2.393
  60. Umami, Yurida Z. (2019). Pelaksanaan Alih Teknologi Melalui Perjanjian Lisensi Paten Berdasarkan Undangundang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016. QISTIE: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.12,(No.1). https://doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v12i1.2752
  61. Victor, J. (2020). Reconceptualizing Compulsory Copyright Licenses. Stanford Law Review, Vol.72. https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/04/Victor-72-Stan.-L.-Rev.-915.pdf
  62. Wade, Robert H. (2003). What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space.’ Review of International Political Economy, Vol.10,(No.4),pp.621–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902
  63. Wagire, Aniruddha Aanil., Joshi, Rohit., Rathore, Ajay, Pal Singh., & Jain, Rakesh. (2021). Development of maturity model for assessing the implementation of Industry 4.0: learning from theory and practice. Production Planning & Control, Vol.32, (No.8), pp.603–622. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09537287.2020.1744763
  64. Worster, William T. (2013). The inductive and deductive methods in customary international law analysis: traditional and modern approaches. Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol.45, 445. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/geojintl45&div=19&id=&page=
  65. Haq, Lalu Muhammad Hayyan. (2011). Legal instruments for an optimal utilization of information and technology under the Intellectual Property Regime: A Study on the Implication of the Creator and Inventor Doctrine for the Utilization of Intellectual Products through Technology Transfer for. Utrecht University
  66. Sara, R. (2021). Juridical Review of Investment Problems with an Environmental Inspection According to Provisions of Law Number 25 of 2007 Concerning Investments. 2nd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2021), Denpasar, (pp.432–438). Amstelkade: Atlantis Press
  67. Suryahartati, D. (2019). Commercialization and Management of Higher Education Research Results In The Industrial Age 4.0: Intellectual Property Rights Perspective. Medan by the Indonesian Intellectual Property Lecturers Association (IIPLA), Medan, 2(02), (pp.127–136). Medan: Talenta Publisher USU
  68. D’Amato, Anthony., & Long, Doris Estelle. (1997). International Intellectual Property Law. Boston : Kluwer Law International
  69. Andrenelli, Andrea., Gourdon, Julien., & Moïsé, Evdokia. (2019). International technology transfer policies. Paris: OECD Publishing
  70. Kusumaatmadja, M. (1986). Pembinaan Hukum Dalam Rangka Pembangunan. Bandung: Bina Citra
  71. Kusumaatmadja, M. (1975). Pembinaan Hukum dalam Rangka Pembangunan Nasional. Bandung: Lembaga Penelitian Hukum dan Kriminologi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
  72. Li, Jizhen., Yin, Ximing., & Shen, Subrina. (2021). China’s science-based innovation and technology transfer in the global context. New York: The Oxford Handbook of China Innovation
  73. Loeneto, Bambang Apriady., Alwi, Zahra., Ernalida, Ernalida., Eryansyah, Eryansyah., & Oktarina, Santi. (2022). Teacher Education Research and Development in Indonesia: Preparing Educators for the Twenty-First Century. In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 173–204). Singapore: Springer
  74. Purwaningsih, E. (2010). Hukum Bisnis. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia
  75. Rustanto. (2012). Hukum Nasionalisasi Modal Asing. Jakarta: Kuwais
  76. Saidin, OK. (1995). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Right). Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada
  77. Sumantoro. (1993). Masalah Pengaturan Alih Teknologi (1st ed.). Bandung: Alumni
  78. Vermeule, A. (2006). Judging under uncertainty: an institutional theory of legal interpretation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  79. Hall, Bronwyn H. (2014). Does patent protection help or hinder technology transfer?. Intellectual Property for Economic Development, Chapter 2, pp.11-32. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~bhhall/ papers/BHH13_KDI_paper.pdf
  80. Love, James P. (2007). Recent examples of the use of compulsory licenses on patents. Knowledge Ecology International. https://www.keionline.org/misc-docs/recent_cls.pdf
  81. Nachum, L. (2001). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD): World Investment Report 2000: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development United Nations
  82. Rahma, M. (2022). Compulsory Licensing bagi Percepatan Alih Tehnologi di Indonesia. Research Report. https://repository.unair.ac.id/115399/
  83. Dutta, Soumitra., Lanvin, Bruno., León, Lorena Rivera, & Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024; Unlocking the Promise of Social Entrepreneurship. Switzerland: WIPO
  84. Wong, Poh Kam., Kwek, William., Lam, Jassmine., Ho, Jia Yi., Ong, Choo Yen., & Wei, Yu. (2022). Global Innovation Hotspots Singapore’s innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem: WIPO Development Studies. WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.46720
  85. Law Number 13 of 2016 Concerning Patents, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia (13 C.E.)
  86. Law (UU) Number 65 of 2024 concerning the Third Amendment to Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents
  87. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2024). Jumlah Permohonan Paten Berdasarkan Jenis Permohonan (Paten/Paten Sederhana). Retrieved from https://katalog.data.go.id/dataset/jumlah-permohonan-paten-berdasarkan-jenis-permohonan-paten-paten-sederhana

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-03-26 10:11:35

No citation recorded.