DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v22i1.68181

Pretrial as Supervisory Mechanism for Protecting Suspects' Human Rights

*Tongat Tongat orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Muhamad Helmi Md Said orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Umi Rozah orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2026 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Although coercive measures in the investigative and prosecutorial processes are essentially legitimate, the line between necessary detention and violations of individual freedoms and human rights is often blurred in practice. Therefore, a control mechanism is essential. This paper aims to analyse two main issues: first, the use of pretrial as a mechanism for monitoring the implementation of suspects' human rights protection during the investigation and prosecution process; and second, the need to consider material aspects in pretrial. Using conceptual, legislative and comparative approaches, this paper reaches at least two conclusions. Firstly, as its focus is limited to the formal procedural process, the pretrial process, as set out in Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, has failed to fulfil its function as a control mechanism for ensuring the protection of suspects' human rights during the investigation and prosecution process. Secondly, the absence of provisions for examining material aspects in pretrial further confirms that it is unable to control the use of coercive measures in the investigative and prosecutorial processes

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Pretrial; Supervisory Mechanism; Protection; Suspects' Human Rights; Investigation And Prosecution

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Conceptual Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Inequality Between The Potential of Fishery Resources and The Poverty Level of Fisherman Communities in Coastal Areas The Potential Application of The Bridging Approach In Community-Based Corrections In Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective Pretrial as Supervisory Mechanism for Protecting Suspects' Human Rights More recent articles
Most cited articles
IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN KEBARUAN DAN PRINSIP ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PERLINDUNGAN DESAIN INDUSTRI PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Abdaud, F. (2018). Upaya Hukum Pascaputusan Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Menegakkan Hukum Dan Keadilan. Al-’Adl, 11(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v11i2.1251
  2. Abidin, Z., & Rosando, A. F. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penyidik Polisi Yang Melakukan Kekerasan Dalam Tahap Penyelidikan. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 2(6), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v2i6.1096
  3. Afandi, F. (2016). Perbandingan Praktik Praperadilan dan Pembentukan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 28(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15868
  4. Alexandrov, A. I., Elagina, E. V., & Kharatishvili, A. G. (2020). Seizure of objects, substances and materials before the initiation of criminal proceedings: Procedural grounds, legal consequences, problems and ways to solve them. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 11(4), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.407
  5. Aprilia, S. S., Siregar, E., & Munandar, T. I. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Tersangka Melalui Upaya Praperadilan. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law,4(1),16–32. https://doi.org/10.22437/ pampas.v4i1.24097
  6. Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,1(1),128. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145
  7. Aziz, F. A. A., & Muzakkir, M. (2024). Implementation of Suspect Rights in The Criminal Investigation Process. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 19(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v19i1.8889
  8. Bauw, L., Silambi, E. D., Kama, I., & Ismail, N. (2022). Pre-Trial As Investigation Process Control System. SASI, 28(4), 608. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1077
  9. Baylor, A. (2015). Beyond the visiting room: A defense counsel challenge to conditions in pretrial confinement. Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal, 14(1). https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/4383/
  10. Billi, M., Dal Pont, T. R., Sabo, I. C., Lagioia, F., Sartor, G., & Rover, A. J. (2023). Supervised Learning, Explanation and Interpretation from Pretrial Detention Decisions by Italian and Brazilian Supreme Courts. Advances in Conceptual Modeling, 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47112-4_12
  11. Blahuta, R. I., Barabash, O. O., Zakharov, V. P., Kovalska, M. Y., & Dobkina, K. R. (2024). Enhancing Human Rights Protections in Ukrainian Law Enforcement: National Compliance with EU Standards. Yuridika, 39(1),1–30. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v39i1.45461
  12. Bouzin, J. T., Sauzier, G., & Lewis, S. W. (2021). Forensic science in Seychelles: An example of a micro-jurisdiction forensic delivery system. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100139
  13. Budiyanto, B., Kaplele, F., & Hadiyanto, A. (2023). The Implementation of The Suspect’s Rights In The Legality of Pretrial Investigation. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 10(1),127. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i1.30577
  14. Campbell, C. M., Labrecque, R. M., Weinerman, M., & Sanchagrin, K. (2020). Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/J.JCRIMJUS.2020.101719
  15. Čentéš, J., & Beleš, A. (2024). Preventive Detention on Remand in Pre-Trial Proceedings from the Point of View of Theory and Practice. Bratislava Law Review,8(2),93–110. https://doi.org/10.46282/BLR.2024.8.2.882
  16. Cruz, S. R. (2022). Investigação criminal, reconhecimento de pessoas e erros judiciais: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10. 22197/rbdpp.v8i2.717
  17. Dhami, M. K., & van den Brink, Y. N. (2022). A Multi-disciplinary and Comparative Approach to Evaluating Pre-trial Detention Decisions: Towards Evidence-Based Reform. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research,28(3),381–395. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09510-0
  18. Doménech-Pascual, G., & Jiménez, J. L. (2024). Changes in damages when liability rules change: an empirical study on compensation for the time spent in pretrial detention. International Review of Law and Economics,78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRLE.2024.106193
  19. Dragojlović, J., & Prica, L. (2022). Critical Review of Decision on Detention and Rights of the Detained Person. Kultura Polisa, 19(4), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa 2022.19.4r.100dp
  20. Erbaş, R. (2021). Effective criminal investigations for women victims of domestic violence: The approach of the ECtHR. Women’s Studies International Forum, 86. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.wsif.2021.102468
  21. Farida, E., Prabandari, A. P., & Rahayu, R. (2020). International Human Rights Instruments and Indonesian Legal Protection For Persons With Disabilities. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology,14(4),4482-4486. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12347
  22. Farida, E., Rahayu, R., Mahfud, M. A., Wibawa, K. C. S., & Ilmy, N. A. (2025). State responsibility and victim protection: an evaluation of non-judicial measures for human rights violations in Indonesia. Cadernos de Dereito Actual, 27, 85–119. https://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1325
  23. Fröwis, M., Gottschalk, T., Haslhofer, B., Rückert, C., & Pesch, P. (2020). Safeguarding the evidential value of forensic cryptocurrency investigations. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2019.200902
  24. Gunawan, R. I. (2020). Effectiveness of pretrial decisions on the implementation of confiscation and its legal implications. Ius Poenale,1(1),63–78. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v1i1.2068
  25. Hartono, D., & Maryanto, M. (2018). Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Polda Jateng. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10. 30659/jdh.v1i1.2564
  26. Hioe, J. K., Gunarto, A. M., & Tarigan, I. J. (2020). Reconstruction Of Pretial Institution Function In Supervising Investigator Authorization Based On Justice Value With Moderating Role Of Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 613. https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/ IJSCM/article/view/4964
  27. Hutauruk, R. H., Febriyani, E., Nurlaily, N., Anwar, N. A. D. P., & Fitri, W. (2025). Rekonstruksi Hukum Perlindungan Lingkungan dan HAM dalam Konteks Climate Resilience. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.1-19
  28. Ilin, D. V. (2023). Appeal Against Illegal Actions of Officials in Criminal Proceedings: Legal and Doctrinal Foundations. Lobbying in the Legislative Process, 2(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.33693/2782-7372-2023-2-1-37-43
  29. Indermaur, D., & Roberts, L. (2009). Confidence in the criminal justice system. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, (387),1-6. https://www.aic.gov.au/publi cations/tandi/ tandi387
  30. Ismail, I., Hapsoro, F. L., & Rezaldy, A. M. (2023). Akuntabilitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Aparat Kepolisian yang Melakukan Tindak Kekerasan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 30(3),602–621. https://doi.org/10.20885/ iustum.vol30.iss3.art7
  31. Kalsum, A., Badaru, B., & Baharuddin, H. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Hak-Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Dalam Proses Penyidikan Perkara Pidana: Studi Di Kejaksaan Negeri Wajo. Journal of Lex Generalis,1(1),70–87. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlg.v1i1.74
  32. Kondowe, G. J. (2020). Drug control and human rights in national jurisdictions. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 46(4), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2020.1804417
  33. Kripsiaji, D., & Minarno, N. B. (2022). Perluasan Kewenangan dan Penegakan Hukum Praperadilan di Indonesia dan Belanda. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v10i1.2573
  34. Kurniawan, R. A. (2018). Pencegahan Penyalagunaan Kewenangan Penyidik Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Masalah-Masalah Hukum,47(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.2.2018.111-117
  35. Kusumastuti, E. (2018). Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan. Yuridika, 33(1),1. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7258
  36. Lin, X., & Chen, C. (2020). Organizational governance and prosecutorial attitudes: Regulating Chinese prosecutors through the performance evaluation mechanism. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2020.100413
  37. Manikis, M., & De Santi, J. (2020). Punishment and Retribution Within the Bail Process: An Analysis of the Public Confidence in the Administration of Justice Ground for Pre-Trial Detention. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société,35(3),413–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2020.12
  38. Martufi, A., & Peristeridou, C. (2020). The Purposes of Pre-Trial Detention and the Quest for Alternatives. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 28(2),153–174. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10002
  39. Minervino, A. C., Silva Júnior, R. C., & Corte-Real, F. (2024). Advancing justice: The impact of Brazil’s convict genetic profile identification project after 5 years. Science & Justice, 64(6), 660–664. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scijus.2024.10.001
  40. Mulyk, K. T. (2022). Theoretical aspects of the beginning of pre-trial investigation. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, (4),332–336. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2022.04.60
  41. Mulyk, K. T. (2023). Historical and theoretical issues of implementation of pre-trial investigation provisions. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights,(5),45–50. https://doi.org/ 10.61345/1339-7915.2023.5.6
  42. Muntaha, M. (2017). Pengaturan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 29(3), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.22318
  43. Nurahman, D., Maroni, M., & Fardiansyah, A. I. (2024). Design of Pre-Trial Institution with the Concept of Preliminary Examining Judge in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00290
  44. Orlovskyi, R., & Kozak, V. (2024). Criminal liability for human trafficking in the context of the war in Ukraine: Challenges and impact. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100558
  45. Parikesit, I., Soponyono, E., & Sukinta, S. (2017). Tinjauan Tentang Objek Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal,6(1),1–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.15663
  46. Prabowo, T., & Iriawan, A. I. (2022). Upaya Paksa Penangkapan dan Penetapan Status Tersangka Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(4), 997–1004. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor. v4i6.15290
  47. Prasetyo, D., & Herawati, R. (2022). Tinjauan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Tersangka di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,4(3),402–417. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.402-417
  48. Putri, L. (2023). Effectiveness and Study of the Criminal Law Pretrial System. Enigma in Law,1(1),21–25. https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v1i1.15
  49. Raharjo, A., & Angkasa, M. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tersangka dalam Penyidikan dari Kekerasan Penyidik di Kepolisian Resort Banyumas. Mimbar Hukum, 23(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.22146/ jmh.16202
  50. Rahayu, R., Roisah, K., Wardana, K. A., & Erlangga, V. L. S. (2024). Human Rights Defenders in Indonesia’s Digital Age: Navigating Limited Spaces in the Quest for Digital Democracy. Sriwijaya Law Review, 358–375. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3860.pp358-375
  51. Reksodiputro, M. (2010). Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Lex Specialist, (11),1–10. https://jih.unbari.ac.id/index.php/ LEX_SPECIALIST/article/view/98
  52. Renzulli, I. (2022). Prison abolition: international human rights law perspectives. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(1),100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13642987.2021.1895766
  53. Rosello, M. (2022). Regional fishery management organisation measures and the imposition of criminal and administrative sanctions in respect of high seas fishing. Marine Policy, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105213
  54. Rumadan, I. (2017). Peran Lembaga Peradilan Sebagai Institusi Penegak Hukum Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Bagi Terwujudnya Perdamaian. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.128
  55. Rustamaji, M. (2016). Simulacra Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah Dalam Ingsutan Kewenangan Praperadilan. Yustisia, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8760
  56. Saknohsiwy, J. O. T., Titahelu, J. A. S., & Latupeirissa, J. E. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Tersangka Pada Tahapan Pra Adjudikasi. LUTUR Law Journal, 3(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.30598/lutur. v3i1.10280
  57. Sari, I. D. M., Gita, H., & Lumbanraja, A. D. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Delik Perbuatan Tidak Menyenangkan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i2.171-181
  58. Schul’tz, V. L., Kul’ba, V. V, Shelkov, A. B., & Bogatyryova, L. V. (2021). Scenario Analysis of Improving the Effectiveness of Cybercrime Investigation Management Problems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(13), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.437
  59. Sebayang, S. (2020). Praperadilan Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Tingkat Penyidikan (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat,19(2),329–383. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v19i2.2445
  60. Sengi, E. (2022). Benarkah Praperadilan Menguji Aspek Formil (Analisis Hukum Penetapan Tersangka dalam Putusan Nomor: 01/Pid.Pra//2021/PN.Tob). Wajah Hukum, 6(2),232. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.901
  61. Sharma, M., Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2022). Evaluating the cumulative impact of indigent defense attorneys on criminal justice outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice,81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101927
  62. Shodunke, A. O., Oladipupo, S. A., Alabi, M. O., & Akindele, A. H. (2023). Establishing the nexus among mob justice, human rights violations and the state: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijlcj.2022.100573
  63. Sinaulan, R. L. (2016). Memahami Perilaku Kekerasan Penyidik Polri terhadap Tersangka pada Tahapan Pra-Adjudikasi (Studi Kajian Ilmu Hukum Normatif Dengan Pendekatan Psikologi Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana). Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 3(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v3i2.1110
  64. Sipayung, B., & Wahyudi, A. (2024). Pretrial Determination of Suspects in Corruption Cases: A Critical Analysis of Judge Sarpin Rizaldi’s Decision and Its Implications for Combating Corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 2(03),225–236. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v2i03.1084
  65. Sistyawan, D. J., Saraswati, R., A. L. W, L.T., Jayawibawa, M., & Aris, M. S. (2024). The Development of Positivism’s Legal Theory: From Bentham to Hart. PETITA, 9, 777. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.402
  66. Sitoresmi, A. S. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan yang Dilakukan oleh Penyidik. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 14(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.17212
  67. Stevenson, M. T., & Mayson, S. G. (2022). Pretrial detention and the value of liberty. Virginia Law Review, 108(3), 709–782. https://virginialawreview.org/articles/pretrial-detention-and-the-value-of-liberty/
  68. Stoykova, R. (Adi). (2024). A New Right to Procedural Accuracy: A Governance Model for Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Computer Law & Security Review,55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040
  69. Strating, R., Rao, S., & Yea, S. (2024). Human rights at sea: The limits of inter-state cooperation in addressing forced labour on fishing vessels. Marine Policy, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105934
  70. Sunaryo, S., & Al-Fatih, S. (2022). How Corruptor Should Be Punished? A Comparative Study Between Criminal Law, Islamic Law, and Customary Law. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 91–100. https://ijcjs.com/menu-script/index.php/ ijcjs/article/view/514
  71. Susilo, E., Din, M., Suhaimi, S., & Mansur, T. M. (2024). Justice Delayed, Justice Denied: A Critical Examination of Repeated Suspect Status in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review,10(3),342–357. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i3.6088
  72. Taghupia, A. V., Pasalbessy, J. D., & Hehanussa, D. J. A. (2022). Problematika Praperadilan Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Tersangka. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 2(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v2i2.773
  73. Tornado, A. S. (2018). Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Prinsip Keadilan. Al-’Adl Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1366
  74. Uli, G. I., Djatmika, P., & Harjati, E. (2024). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Praperadilan Putusan 33/Pid.Prap/2020/PN.JKT.SEL Tentang Penetapan Tersangka Tidak Sah dalam Keadilan Kepastian Hukum. RechtJiva,1(1),44–61. https://doi.org/10.21776/rechtjiva.v1n1.3
  75. Wardana, K. A., Rahayu, R., & Sukirno, S. (2024). Redefining Indonesia’s Blasphemy Law In The Digital Age: A Human Rights Perspective. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1. 2024.19-35
  76. Waqar, M., Iqbal. A., & Kazmi, S. S. A. (2022). Criminal Justice System and its Impacts on Criminal Trial Law, Practice and Procedure in Pakistan: An Analytical Study. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr. 2022(6-III)24
  77. Wijaya, F. (2022). Pergeseran Paradigma Dalam Praperadilan: Menyongsong Keadilan Prosedural Yang Substantif. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, 1(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.32734/nlr.v1i1.9606
  78. Yuherawan, D. (2020). The Pretrial (Praperadilan) Filed By The Suspect With The Status Wanted List of People (DPO). Veteran Law Review,3(2),109. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v3i2.2121
  79. Zhang, S. (2025). Law enforcement or use of force: The legal nature of activities conducted by CCG and JCG in the disputed waters. Marine Policy, 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106440
  80. Lovina, L., & Dirga, S. (2022). Judicial Scrutiny melalui Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam RKUHAP. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR)
  81. Eddyono, S. W., Djafar, W., Sufriyadi, S., Napitupulu, E. A. T., & Sriyana, S. (2014). Praperadilan di Indonesia: Teori, Sejarah dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform
  82. Flynn, A., & Freiberg, A. (2018). Building Trust and Confidence in the Criminal Justice System. In Asher Flynn & Arie Freiberg (Eds.), Plea Negotiations; Pragmatic Justice in an Imperfect World (pp.207-220). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-92630-8_9
  83. Merkel, G. (2019). Detention before Trial and Civil Detention of Dangerous Individuals. In D. K. Brown, J. I. Turner, & B. Weisser (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process (pp. 498–519). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.28
  84. Morgenstern, C. (2023). Pre-trial detention in Germany: a liberal approach, but not for all. In European Perspectives on Pre-Trial Detention (pp. 81–100). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159254-5
  85. Soemadiningrat, R. O. S. (2009). Teori hukum: mengingat, mengumpulkan, dan membuka kembali. Bandung : Refika Aditama
  86. Tongat, T. (2024). Eksaminasi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cirebon Nomor 16/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PN Cbn. Malang: Fakultas Hukum UMM
  87. Turner, E. R. (2018). Public Confidence in Criminal Justice: What’s the Problem?. In: Public Confidence in Criminal Justice. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan,Cham. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-67897-9_1
  88. Kamus Hukum Online Indonesia. (2016). Definisi dan arti kata An Sich. Retrieved from https://kamushukum.web.id/arti-kata/ansich

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-02-23 04:39:41

No citation recorded.