1. Home
  2. Vol 51, No 1 (2022)
  3. Hadisusilo

RUANG UDARA DI ATAS ALUR LAUT KEPULAUAN INDONESIA (ALKI): SEBUAH TINJAUAN HUKUM

Priyo Hadisusilo
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.49-60
Copyright (c) 2022 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui status dan karakteristik dari perspektif hukum terhadap ruang udara diatas Alur Laut Kepulauan Indonesia (ALKI) dalam relasinya dengan kedaulatan yang bisa dilaksanakan oleh negara kepulauan. Berdasarkan kajian normatif didapatkan hasil bahwa pada ruang udara di atas ALKI dibawah rezim hukum khusus (sui generis) sebagai inovasi yang lahir pasca UNCLOS 1982, menjadikan pelaksanaan kedaulatan negara di wilayah udara dibatasi. Selanjutnya, pelaksanaan kedaulatan oleh negara tidak dapat menerapkan hard law yang dapat berpotensi menghambat dan menangguhkan pelaksanaan hak lintas penerbangan alur laut kepulauan oleh pesawat udara asing, hal ini juga telah terlihat secara historis dalam perumusan konsep awal negara kepulauan dalam UNCLOS 1982.

Full Text: PDF

Keywords

Alur Laut Kepulauan Indonesia; Lintas Penerbangan; Ruang Udara; Kedaulatan

References

Agoes, E. R. (2021). Praktik Negara-Negara Atas Konsepsi Negara Kepulauan. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 1(3), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol1.3.400

Asikin, Z. ; A. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bateman, S. (2007). UNCLOS and Its Limitations as the Foundation for a Regional Maritime Security Regime. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 19(3), 27–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270709464140

Buntoro, K. (2016). Nusantara dan ALKI. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Buntoro, Kresno. (2011). Legal and Technical Issues on Designating Archipelagic Sea Lanes Passage: Indonesia Experience. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 8(2), 219.

Cay, V. J. E. (2010). Archipelagic sea lanes passage and maritime security in archipelagic Southeast Asia. Semantic Scholar. Archipelagic sea lanes passage and maritime security in archipelagic Southeast Asia

Chieza, J. S. (2018). Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos A Latin phrase which translates to whoever’s is the soil, it is theirs all the way to Heaven and all the Property law rights. Near East University.

Cogliati-Bantz, V. P. (2015). 18 Archipelagic States and the New Law of the Sea. In Law of the Sea From Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (pp. 297–317). Brill Nijhoff.

Dean, A. H. (1960). The Second Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Fight for Freedom of the Seas. The American Journal of International Law, 54(4), 751–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2195140

Djalal, H. (1979). Perjuangan Indonesia di Bidang Hukum Laut. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman.

Djalal, Hasjim. (2015). Due Regards’ and ‘Abuse of Rights’ in UNCLOS. In UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the South China Sea (p. 8). Routledge.

Forward, C. (2009). Archipelagic Sea-Lanes in Indonesia – Their Legality in International Law. Australia and New Zealand Marine Law Journal, 23(2006), 143–156.

Goedhuis, D. (1955). Air Sovereignty Concept and United States Influence on its Future Development. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 22(2), 209.

Goedhuis, Daniel. (2013). National Airlegislations and the Warsaw Convention. Springer.

Hutchinson, T. and N. D. (2012). Defining And Describing What We Do:Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2008.77

International Court of Justice. (1951). Opinion of Judge Alvarez. In ICJ Reports. http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/1/001-19490409-JUD-01-01-EN.pdf

International Maritime Organization. (1998). 72(69) Adoption, designation and substitution of archipelagic sea lanes : Partial system of archipelagic sea lanes in Indonesian archipelagic waters (Vol. 72, Issue 69).

Johnson, C. (2000). A Rite of Passage: The IMO Consideration of the Indonesian Archipelagic Sea-Lanes Submission. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 15(3), 317–332.

Kohen, M. G. (2015). 9 Is the Internal Waters Regime Excluded from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea? In Law of the Sea, From Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (pp. 110–124). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004283787_010

Krasner, S. D. (2001). Sovereignty. Foreign Policy, 20–29.

Krasner, Stephen D. (2007). Sovereignty. Wiley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss213

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2017). Konsepsi Hukum Negara Nusantara Pada Konperensi Hukum Laut Ke-Iii. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 33(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol33.no1.1376

Lamont, C. K. (2014). Conflict in the Skies: The Law of Air Defence Identification Zones. Air and Space Law, 39(3), 187 – 202.

Loja, H. A. (2017). Legal Status of the Airspace Over an Indeterminate Territory : The Case of the Spratly Islands. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 4(2), 7–31. http://mendeley.csuc.cat/fitxers/01fe822c31cb36bea8230cffbad8a3ce

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mc.Conville, M. (2017). Research methods for law. Edinburgh University Press.

Milde, M. (2008). International Air Law and ICAO. Eleven International Publishing.

Pépin, E. (1956). The legal Status of the Airspace in the Light of Progress in Aviation and Astronautics 3. McGill LJ.

Prescott, V. and C. S. (2004). The maritime political boundaries of the world. Brill Nijhoff.

Scovazzi, T. (2020). The Progressive Development of International Law of the Sea: Within or (in Certain Cases) without the UNCLOS. China Oceans L. Rev., 16(3), 12.

Soekanto, S. and S. M. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Strating, R. and E. W. C. (2020). Defending the maritime rules-based order: regional responses to the South China Sea disputes. East-West Center.

U . S . Department of Defense. (2017). U . S . Department of Defense Freedom of Navigation ( FON ) Program (Issue 1).

Van Dyke, J. M. (2004). Balancing Navigation Freedom with Environmental and Security Concerns. Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y, 15, 19.

Williams, A. J. (2010). A crisis in aerial sovereignty? Considering the implications of recent military violations of national airspace. Area, 42(1), 51–59.