Evaluating the potential energy of a heliostat field and solar receiver of solar tower power plants in the southern region of Turkey

*Raad Kadhim Al-Dualimi -  University of Gaziantep, Turkey
Mehmet Sait Söylemez -  University of Gaziantep, Turkey
Published: 15 Jul 2016.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2016 International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 1830 1019
Abstract

A prior study on the performance of high-efficient models for a heliostat field and solar receiver at various candidate locations (e.g., certain regions in the south of Turkey) helped determine suitable locations for installing solar tower power plant units. This study considered the fact that solar tower power plants are affected by the working conditions of a particular site, which helps realize the highest performance of the solar power tower plant. An optimized heliostat field consisting of 2650 SENER heliostats and a model of a solar receiver based on the data obtained using Gemasolar in Seville, Spain, was used as a reference in this work. Each heliostat position is specified using an optimization algorithm that refines previously proposed models, and two parameters are added to this model to further optimize the heliostat layout. Then, a sample analytical thermal model is used for predicting the radiative and convective heat losses from the receiver system.

 

Article History: Received March 13rd 2016; Received in revised form Jun 22nd 2016; Accepted July 3rd 2016; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Ra'ad, K, M, A. and Mehmet, S, S. (2016), Evaluating the potential energy of a heliostat field and solar receiver of solar tower power plants in the southern region of Turkey. Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 5(2), 151-161,

http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/ijred.5.2.151-161

 
Keywords
heliostat field, simulation, solar power tower plant, solar receiver, Turkey

Article Metrics:

  1. Chiesi, M., Vanzolini, L., Scarselli, E.F., Guerrieri, R. (2013) Accurate optical model for design and analysis of solar fields based on heterogeneous multicore systems. Renewable Energy 55: 241-251.
  2. Siala, F.M.F., Elayeb, M.E. (2001) Mathematical formulation of a graphical method for a no-blocking heliostat field layout. Renewable Energy 23: 77–92.
  3. Leonardi, E, D’Aguanno, B. (2011) CRS4-2: a numerical code for the calculation of the solar power collected in a central receiver system. Energy 36: 4828–4837.
  4. Wei, X., Lu, Z., Yu, W., Wang, Z. (2010) A new code for the design and analysis of the heliostat field layout for power tower system. Solar Energy 84: 685–690.
  5. Kolb, G.J., Ho, C.K., Mancini, T.R., Gary, J.A. (2011) Power tower technology roadmap and cost reduction plan. SAND2011-2419, Alburquerque 1–35.
  6. Garcia, P., Ferriere, A., Bezian, J.-J. (2008) Codes for solar flux calculation dedicated to central receiver system applications: a comparative review. SolAR Energy 82: 189–197.
  7. Noone, C.J., Torrilhon, M., Mitsos, A. (2012) Heliostat field optimization: a new computationally efficient model and biomimetic layout. Solar Energy 86: 792–803.
  8. Collado, F.J., Guallar, J. (2013) A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code. Renewable Sustainable Energy Review 20: 142–154.
  9. Besarati, S.M., Goswami, D.Y. (2014) A computationally efficient method for the design of the heliostat field for solar power tower plant. Renewable Energy 69: 226–232.
  10. Chiesi, M., Vanzolini, L., Scarselli, E.F., Guerrieri, R. (2013) Accurate optical model for design and analysis of solar fields based on heterogeneous multicore systems. Renewable Energy 55: 241–251.
  11. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2013 ASHRAE Handbook - Fundamentals (SI); Climatic Design Information, ASHRAE, Georgia, USA, 2013.
  12. Burgaleta, J.I., Arias, S., Ramirez, D. (2011) GEMASOLAR: the first tower thermo-solar commercial plant with molten salt storage. SolarPA-CES 2012 International Conference.
  13. Amadei, C.A., Allesina, G., Tartarini, P., Yuting, W. (2013) Simulation of GEMASOLAR-based solar tower plants for the Chinese energy market: influence of plant downsizing and location change. Renewable Energy 55: 366–373.
  14. Collado, F.J., Guallar, J. (2012) Campo: generation of regular heliostat fields. Renewable Energy 46: 49–59.
  15. Schmitz, M., Schwarzbozl, P., Buck, R., Pitz-Paal R. (2006). Assessment of the potential improvement due to multiple apertures in central receiver systems with secondary concentrators. Solar Energy 80: 111–120.
  16. Collado, F.J. (2010) One-point fitting of the flux density produced by a heliostat. Solar Energy 84: 673–684.
  17. Pacheco, James E. Final Test and Evaluation Results from the Solar Two Project. SAND2002-0120. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
  18. Duffie J.A., Beckman W.A. (1991) Solar engineering of thermal processes. New York: Wiley.
  19. Stine, W.B., Harrigon, R.W. (1985) Solar Energy Fundamentals and Design with Computer Application. New York: Wiley.
  20. Chong, K.K., Tan, M.H. (2011) Range of motion study for two different sun-tracking methods in the application of heliostat field. Solar Energy 85: 1837–1850.
  21. Lata, J.M., Rodríguez, M., Álvarez de Lara, M. (2008) High flux central receivers of molten salts for the new generation of commercial stand-alone solar power plan. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 130: 021002.
  22. Ferri, R., Cammi, A., Mazzei, D. (2008) Molten salt mixture properties in RELAP5 code for thermodynamic solar applications. International Journal of Thermal Science 47: 1676–1687.
  23. Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Santana, D. (2015) Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function. Renewable Energy 74: 576–587.
  24. Siebers, D.L., Kraabel, J.S. (1984) Estimating Convective Energy Losses from Solar Central Receivers. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque. SAND 84-8717.
  25. Wagner, M.J. (2008) Simulation and predictive performance modeling of utility-scale central receiver system power plant. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  26. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2011 ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications (SI).
  27. Li, X., Kong, W., Wang, Z., Chang, C., Bai, F. (2010) Thermal model and thermodynamic performance of molten salt cavity receiver, Renewable Energy 35: 981–988.
  28. Gregory J. K. An Evaluation of Possible Next-Generation High-Temperature Molten-Salt Power Towers. Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2011-9320 Albuquerque, NM.