DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.2.93-100

Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Biogas Production from Cow Dung in A Semi Continuous Anaerobic Digester

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, the University of Lampung, Indonesia, Indonesia

Published: 10 Jul 2018.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto

Citation Format:
Abstract

The efficiency of biogas production in semi-continuous anaerobic digester is influenced by several factors, among other is loading rate. This research aimed at determining the effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the biogas yield. Experiment was conducted using lab scale self-designed anaerobic digester of 36-L capacity with substrate of a mixture of fresh cow dung and water at a ratio of 1:1. Experiment was run with substrate initial amount of 25 L and five treatment variations of HRT, namely 1.31 gVS/L/d (P1), 2.47 gVS/L/d (P2), 3.82 gVS/L/d (P3), 5.35 gVS/L/d (P4) and 6.67 gVS/L/d (P5). Digester performance including pH, temperature, and biogas yield was measured every day. After stable condition was achieved, biogas composition was analyzed using a gas chromatograph. A 10-day moving average analysis of biogas production was performed to compare biogas yield of each treatment. Results showed that digesters run quite well with average pH of 6.8-7.0 and average daily temperature 28.7-29.1. The best biogas productivity (77.32 L/kg VSremoval) was found in P1 treatment (organic loading rate of 1.31 g/L/d) with biogas yield of 7.23 L/d. With methane content of 57.23% treatment P1 also produce the highest methane yield. Biogas production showed a stable rate after the day of 44. Modified Gompertz kinetic equation is suitable to model daily biogas yield as a function of digestion time.

Article History: Received March 24th 2018; Received in revised form June 2nd 2018; Accepted June 16th 2018; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Haryanto, A., Triyono, S., and Wicaksono, N.H. (2018) Effect of Loading Rate on Biogas Production from Cow Dung in A Semi Continuous Anaerobic Digester. Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 7(2), 93-100.

https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.2.93-100

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: biogas; yield; cow dung; loading rate; semi-continuous digester
Funding: Directorate General of Higher Education

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Investigation on Gaseous and Particle Mass Emissions from Automatically Fired Small Scale Heating System under Laboratory Conditions A Review on Solar PV Based Grid Connected Microinverter Control Schemes and Topologies Evaluation of Physico-Mechanical-Combustion Characteristics of Fuel Briquettes made from blends of Areca Nut Husk, Simarouba Seed Shell and Black Liquor More recent articles
Most cited articles
Distributed Generation: A Critical Review of Technologies, Grid Integration Issues, Growth Drivers and Potential Benefits A Novel Integration of PCM with Wind-Catcher Skin Material in Order to Increase Heat Transfer Rate Wind Resource Assessment in Abadan Airport in Iran Cultivation of Chlorella sp. as Biofuel Sources in Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Status and Benefits of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Rural Areas of Ethiopia: A Case Study on Improved Cooking Stoves and Biogas Technologies More cited articles
  1. Abbasi, T.S., Tauseef, M., & Abbasi, S.A. (2012) Biogas Energy. New York: Springer Briefs in Environmental Science
  2. Aboudi, K., Álvarez-Gallego, C.J., & Romero-García, L.I. (2015) Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet byproduct and pig manure: Effect of the organic loading rate (OLR) on process performance. Bioresource Technology, 194, 283–290
  3. Abubakar, B.S.U.I. & Ismail, N. (2012) Anaerobic digestion of cow dung for biogas production. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 7(2), pp. 169–172
  4. Aland, A., Lidfors, L., & Ekesbo, I. (2002) Diurnal distribution of dairy cow defecation and urination. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78, 43–54
  5. Babaee, A. & Shayegan, J. (2011) Effect of organic loading rates (OLR) on production of methane from anaerobic digestion of vegetables waste. World Renewable Energy Congress 2011, Linköping, Sweden: May 8–13, 2011
  6. Barnhart, S. (2014) From household decisions to global networks: biogas and the allure of carbon trading in Nepal. The Professional Geographer, 66(3), 345–353
  7. Budiyono, Widiasa, I.N., Johari, S., and Sunarso. (2010) The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode. International Journal of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 3(1), 39–44
  8. Ditjenak (Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan). (2016) Livestock and Animal Health Statistics 2016. Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture
  9. Chen, Y., Hua, W., Feng, Y., & Sweeney, S. (2014) Status and prospects of rural biogas development in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 679–685
  10. de Mes, T.Z.D.A., Stams, J.M., Reith, J.H., & Zeeman, G. (2003) Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes. In Bio-methane & Bio-hydrogen: Status and Perspectives of Biological Methane and Hydrogen Production (Edited by: J. H. Reith, R. H. Wijffels, and H. Barten). Dutch Biological Hydrogen Foundation, the Netherlands
  11. Gomez, E.F. (2010) Effects of Organic Loading Rate on Reactor Performance and Archaeal Community Structure in Mesophilic Anaerobic Digesters Treating Municipal Sewage Sludge. M.Sc. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA. 2010
  12. Haryanto, A., Cahyani, D., Triyono, S., Murdapa, F., & Haryono, D. (2017) Economic Benefit and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of A Family-Scale Cowdung Anaerobic Biogas Digester. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6(1), 29-36
  13. Ituen, E.E., John, N.M., & Bassey, B.E. (2007) Biogas production from organic waste in Akwa Ibom State of Nigeria. In Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Developing World: Selected Papers from ERTEP 2007, July 17-19, Ghana. (Ernest K. Yanful, editor). Germany: Springer Science + Business Media B.V
  14. Jha, A.K., Li, J., Ban, Q., Zhang, L., & Zhao, B. (2012) Dry anaerobic digestion of cow dung for methane production: effect of mixing. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 1111-1118
  15. Kabir, H., Yegbemey, R.N., & Bauer, S. (2013) Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 881–889
  16. Khan, U.K., Mainali, B., Martin, A., & Silveira, S. (2014) Techno-economic analysis of small scale biogas based polygeneration systems: Bangladesh case study. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 7, 68–78
  17. Luo, T., Zhu, N., Shen, F., Long, E., Long, Y., Chen, X., & Mei, Z.A. (2016) Case study assessment of the suitability of small-scale biogas plants to the dispersed agricultural structure of China. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 7(5), 1131–1139
  18. MEMR (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources). (2016). Handbook of Energy Economic and Statistics. Jakarta
  19. Naik, L., Gebreegziabher, Z., Tumwesige, V., Balana, B.B., Mwirigi, J., & Austin, G. (2014) Factors determining the stability and productivity of small scale anaerobic digesters. Biomass and Bioenergy, 70, 51–57
  20. Nguyen, V.C.N. (2011) Small-scale anaerobic digesters in Vietnam – Development and challenges. Journal of Vietnamese Environment, 1(1), 12–18
  21. Pandey, P.K., Ndegwa, P.M., Soupir, M.L., Alldredge, J.R. & Pitts, M.J. (2011) Efficacies of inocula on the startup of anaerobic reactors treating dairy manure under stirred and unstirred conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 2705–2720
  22. Salam, B., Biswas, S., & Rabbi, Md. S. (2015) Biogas from mesophilic anaerobic digestion of cow dung using silica gel as catalyst. Procedia Engineering, 105, 652–657
  23. Sibiya, N.T., Muzenda, E., & Tesfagiorgis, H.B. (2014) Effect of temperature and pH on the anaerobic digestion of grass silage. 6th International Conference on Green Technology, Renewable Energy & Environmental Engineering (ICGTREEE). Cape Town, South Africa: Nov. 27–28, 2014
  24. Singh, K.J. & Sooch, S.S. (2004) Comparative study of economics of different models of family size biogas plants for state of Punjab, India. Energy Conversion & Management, 45, 1329–1341
  25. Song, Z., Zhang, C., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G., & Han, X. (2014) Comparison of biogas development from households and medium and large-scale biogas plants in rural China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 204–213
  26. Stafford, M.G. (1982) The Effect of pH on Methane Production from Dairy Cattle Manure. Masters Thesis, University of Central Florida, USA
  27. Sugiyono, A., Anindhita, Wahid, L.M.A. and Adiarso (editors). (2016) Indonesia Energy Outlook 2016. Jakarta: Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT)
  28. Syaichurrozi, L., Budiyono, and Sumardiono, S. (2013) Predicting kinetic model of biogas production and biodegradability organic materials: biogas production from vinasse at variation of COD/N ratio. Bioresource technology, 149, 390–397
  29. Yusuf, M.O.L., Debora, A. and Ogheneruona, D.E. (2011) Ambient temperature kinetic assessment of biogas production from co-digestion of horse and cow dung. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 57(3), 97–104

Last update:

  1. Performance of parallel and series semi continuous biogas production from cow manure

    Henny Sudibyo, Arini Wresta, Dian Andriani, Arifin Santosa, Ahmad Rajani, Kusnadi, Aep Saepudin. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION 2022 (ICSEEA2022), 3069 , 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0205707

  2. Anaerobic digestion of Azolla pinnata biomass grown in integrated industrial effluent for enhanced biogas production and COD reduction: Optimization and kinetics studies

    Vinod Kumar, Pankaj Kumar, Piyush Kumar, Jogendra Singh. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 17 , 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100627

  3. Effect of Organic Waste Addition into Animal Manure on Biogas Production Using Anaerobic Digestion Method

    Fahmi Arifan, Abdullah Abdullah, Siswo Sumardiono. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10 (3), 2021. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2021.36107

  4. Optimisation of Off-grid Solar-Biogas Hybrid System for a Dairy Plant in India

    Priyank Tamilsekaran, Mohamed Salman. 2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT), 2022. doi: 10.1109/GCAT55367.2022.9972097

  5. Operational Excellence in a Biogas Plant through Integration of Lean Six Sigma Methodology

    Samet Cinar, Senem Önen Cinar, Christian Staudter, Kerstin Kuchta. Designs, 6 (4), 2022. doi: 10.3390/designs6040061

  6. Cow products: boon to human health and food security

    Arti Prasad, Naresh Kothari. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 54 (1), 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-03014-5

  7. Effect of acidic pretreatment on the microstructural arrangement and anaerobic digestion of Arachis hypogea shells; and process parameters optimization using response surface methodology

    Kehinde O. Olatunji, Daniel M. Madyira. Heliyon, 9 (4), 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15145

  8. Impacts of Anaerobic Co-Digestion on Different Influencing Parameters: A Critical Review

    Mohammed Kelif Ibro, Venkata Ramayya Ancha, Dejene Beyene Lemma. Sustainability, 14 (15), 2022. doi: 10.3390/su14159387

  9. Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters

    B. Stürmer, D. Leiers, V. Anspach, E. Brügging, D. Scharfy, T. Wissel. Renewable Energy, 164 , 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.074

  10. Optimization of methane yield from co-digestion of alkalipretreated groundnut shells and duck waste using response surface methodology

    K O Olatunji, D M Madyira. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1322 (1), 2024. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1322/1/012002

  11. The hydraulic retention time (HRT) control upon palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment by bio-CSTR 1 m3

    Galuh Wirama Murti, Joni Prasetyo, Arya Bhaskara Adiprabowo, Zulaicha Dwi Hastuti, Nurdiah Rahmawati, Atti Solihah, Septina Is Heriyanti, Era Restu Finalis, Tyas Puspita Rini, Novio Valentino, Semuel Pati Senda. THERMOFLUID XII: The 12th International Conference on Thermofluids 2021, 2836 , 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0206013

  12. Technical and operational challenges in setting up a decentralized biogas plant: Opportunities and future perspective toward sustainable nation

    Deval Singh, Mamta Tembhare, Anil Kumar Dikshit, Mohan B. Dangi, Sunil Kumar. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 185 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.02.079

  13. Evaluating the Potential of Domestic Animal Manure for Biogas Production in Ethiopia

    Fikadu Kumsa Gemechu, Mohammad Khan. Journal of Energy, 2020 , 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/8815484

  14. Upgrading biogas into syngas through dry reforming

    Sungyup Jung, Jechan Lee, Deok Hyun Moon, Ki-Hyun Kim, Eilhann E. Kwon. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143 , 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110949

  15. Anaerobic digestion

    Mian Laiq Ur Rehman, Awais Iqbal, Chein‐Chi Chang, Weizun Li, Meiting Ju. Water Environment Research, 91 (10), 2019. doi: 10.1002/wer.1219

  16. Modelling the effects of particle size pretreatment method on biogas yield of groundnut shells

    Kehinde Oladoke Olatunji, Daniel M Madyira, Noor A Ahmed, Simeon O Jekayinfa, Oyetola Ogunkunle. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 40 (8), 2022. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211073852

  17. A review on recent technological breakthroughs in anaerobic digestion of organic biowaste for biogas generation: Challenges towards sustainable development goals

    K. Archana, A.S. Visckram, P. Senthil Kumar, S. Manikandan, A. Saravanan, L. Natrayan. Fuel, 358 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130298

  18. Effect of organic loading on anaerobic digestion of cow dung: Methane production and kinetic study

    Adila Fazliyana Aili Hamzah, Muhammad Hazwan Hamzah, Hasfalina Che Man, Nur Syakina Jamali, Shamsul Izhar Siajam, Muhammad Heikal Ismail. Heliyon, 9 (6), 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16791

  19. Comparison of the Prediction Accuracy of Total Viable Bacteria Counts in a Batch Balloon Digester Charged with Cow Manure: Multiple Linear Regression and Non-Linear Regression Models

    Stephen Tangwe, Patrick Mukumba, Golden Makaka. Energies, 15 (19), 2022. doi: 10.3390/en15197407

  20. Thermodynamic prediction of biogas production and combustion: The spontaneity and energy conversion efficiency from photosynthesis to combustion

    Endalkachew Addis Mekonen, Yonas Tibebu Mekonnen, Samuel O. Fatoba. Scientific African, 21 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01776

  21. Production of Biogas from Food Waste Using the Anaerobic Digestion Process with Biofilm-Based Pretreatment

    Amina Mohamed Ali, Md Zahangir Alam, Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-latif, Mohammed Saedi Jami, Ibrahim Gamiye Bouh, Ibrahim Adebayo Bello, Tarik Ainane. Processes, 11 (3), 2023. doi: 10.3390/pr11030655

  22. Performance evaluation of prefabricated polyvinyl chloride floating dome type anaerobic biogas digester of different feeding intervals using animal waste

    Mohammad Enamul Haque, Roman Ryndin, Heinz‐Peter Mang, Humayun Kabir, Mohummad Muklesur Rahman, Abul Kalam Mohammad Khasruzzaman, Mohammad Asir Uddin, Mohammad Alimul Islam. JSFA reports, 2 (1), 2022. doi: 10.1002/jsf2.25

  23. Influential factors in anaerobic digestion of rice-derived food waste and animal manure: A comprehensive review

    Tado Gyadi, Ajay Bharti, Sudip Basack, Pradeep Kumar, Elena Lucchi. Bioresource Technology, 413 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131398

  24. Optimizing the performance of a large scale biogas plant by controlling stirring process: A case study

    Abdullah Nsair, Senem Önen Cinar, Hani Abu Qdais, Kerstin Kuchta. Energy Conversion and Management, 198 , 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111931

  25. Design of biogas digester with thermophilic pretreatment for reducing fruits wastes

    Budy Rahmat, Ida Hodiyah, Apip Supriadi, Memet Hikmat, Gilang Purnama. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 8 (S1), 2019. doi: 10.1007/s40093-019-00301-y

  26. Recycling slaughterhouse wastes into potential energy and hydrogen sources: An approach for the future sustainable energy

    Md Wahid Chowdhury, Md Nurun Nabi, Md Arman Arefin, Fazlur Rashid, Mohammad Towhidul Islam, Prasad Gudimetla, S.M. Muyeen. Bioresource Technology Reports, 19 , 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101133

  27. Conversion of Waste Biomass into Gaseous Fuel: Present Status and Challenges in India

    Ravi Kant Bhatia, Govindarajan Ramadoss, Amit Kumar Jain, Rakesh Kumar Dhiman, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Arvind Kumar Bhatt. BioEnergy Research, 13 (4), 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12155-020-10137-4

  28. Optimization of parameters in biomethanization process with co-digested poultry wastes and palm oil mill effluents

    Emmanuel Ikechukwu Ugwu, Juliana Heloisa Pinê Américo-Pinheiro, Light Ihenna Nwobia, Vineet Kumar, Eberechukwu Laura Ikechukwu, Egba Chinonso Victor. Cleaner Chemical Engineering, 3 , 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.clce.2022.100033

  29. The impact of organic loading on the anaerobic digestion of cow manure: Methane production and kinetic analysis

    Tariq Alkhrissat. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 9 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100589

  30. Production of Biogas and Biomethane as Renewable Energy Sources: A Review

    Debora Mignogna, Paolo Ceci, Claudia Cafaro, Giulia Corazzi, Pasquale Avino. Applied Sciences, 13 (18), 2023. doi: 10.3390/app131810219

  31. Optimizing anaerobic co-digestion of Xyris capensis and duck waste using neuro-fuzzy model and response surface methodology

    Kehinde O. Olatunji, Daniel M. Madyira, Oluwatobi Adeleke. Fuel, 354 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129334

Last update: 2024-11-20 04:08:31

  1. Anaerobic digestion of Azolla pinnata biomass grown in integrated industrial effluent for enhanced biogas production and COD reduction: Optimization and kinetics studies

    Vinod Kumar, Pankaj Kumar, Piyush Kumar, Jogendra Singh. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 17 , 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100627

  2. Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters

    B. Stürmer, D. Leiers, V. Anspach, E. Brügging, D. Scharfy, T. Wissel. Renewable Energy, 164 , 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.074

  3. Anaerobic digestion

    Mian Laiq Ur Rehman, Awais Iqbal, Chein‐Chi Chang, Weizun Li, Meiting Ju. Water Environment Research, 91 (10), 2019. doi: 10.1002/wer.1219

  4. Optimizing the performance of a large scale biogas plant by controlling stirring process: A case study

    Abdullah Nsair, Senem Önen Cinar, Hani Abu Qdais, Kerstin Kuchta. Energy Conversion and Management, 198 , 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111931

  5. Design of biogas digester with thermophilic pretreatment for reducing fruits wastes

    Budy Rahmat, Ida Hodiyah, Apip Supriadi, Memet Hikmat, Gilang Purnama. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 8 (S1), 2019. doi: 10.1007/s40093-019-00301-y

  6. Conversion of Waste Biomass into Gaseous Fuel: Present Status and Challenges in India

    Ravi Kant Bhatia, Govindarajan Ramadoss, Amit Kumar Jain, Rakesh Kumar Dhiman, Shashi Kant Bhatia, Arvind Kumar Bhatt. BioEnergy Research, 13 (4), 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12155-020-10137-4