skip to main content

The Determinants Factors of Biogas Technology Adoption in Cattle Farming: Evidences from Pati, Indonesia

Jatmiko Wahyudi orcid

Development Planning Agency of Pati Regency, Indonesia

Published: 6 Nov 2017.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto

Citation Format:
Abstract

Even though biogas technology has been introduced in Indonesia since 1990’s and having the potential, the rate of biogas adoption in Indonesia runs slowly. It is important to understand factors encouraging or discouraging potential adopters to build biogas plant. The development of livestock sector especially cattle farming in Indonesia can be seen as the opportunity to increase the rate of biogas adoption. This study investigated the factors affecting households of cattle farmer to adopt or not to adopt biogas technology. A cross-sectional research survey was carried out by using structured questionnaires as the primary tool to collect data from both biogas adopters and non biogas adopters in Pati regency, Indonesia. Socioeconomic characteristic of potential biogas adopters plays an important role to ensure the adoption of biogas technology sustainable. Socioeconomic characteristic regarding having high social status determines individual to adopt biogas relatively earlier than other members of a social system. Having high income and education enables traditional farmers to finance biogas plant by their own money or access aid from the government or other agencies. Among other attributes of innovation, relative advantage of installing biogas plant is the most determinant attribute to speed the rate of biogas adoption. Having biogas plant was perceived as better option and generated more benefits compared to previous technology or method.

Article History: Received May 17th 2017; Received in revised form August 5th  2017; Accepted Sept 6th 2017; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Wahyudi, J. (2017) The Determinant Factors of Biogas Technology Adoption in Cattle Farming: Evidences from Pati, Indonesia, Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6(3), 235-240.

https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.6.3.235-240

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: adoption; biogas technology; cattle farming; determinant factors
Funding: the Government of Pati regency

Article Metrics:

  1. Bond, T. & Templeton, M.R. (2011) History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.003
  2. Chakrabarty, S., Boksh, F.I.M.M. & Chakraborty, A. (2013) Economic viability of biogas and green self-employment opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 757-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.002
  3. Clemens, J., Trimborn, M., Weiland, P. & Amon, B. (2006) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 112, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016
  4. Government of Indonesia (GOI) (2016) Statistical yearbook of Indonesia 2016. Central Statistical Agency, Jakarta
  5. Haryanto, A, Cahyani, D. Triyono, S. Murdapa, F. & Haryono, D. (2017) Economic Benefit and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of a Family-Scale Cowdung Anaerobic Biogas Digester. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6 (1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.6.1.29-36
  6. Huboyo, H.S. Tohno, S. Lestari, P. Mizohata, A. & Okumura, M. (2014) Characteristics of indoor air pollution in rural mountainous and rural coastal communities in Indonesia. Atmospheric Environment, 82, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.044
  7. IPCC. (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: IGES, Japan, 2006
  8. Jian, L. (2009) Socioeconomic barriers to biogas development in rural southwest China: an ethnographic case study. Human Organization, 68(4), 415–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.68.4.y21mu5lt8075t881
  9. Kabir, H. Yegbemey, R.N. & Bauer, S. (2013) Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.046
  10. Lohri, C.R. Rodić, L. & Zurbrügg, C. (2013) Feasibility assessment tool for urban anaerobic digestion in developing countries. Journal of Enviromental Management, 126, 122–131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.028
  11. Massé, D.I. Talbot, G. & Gilbert, Y. (2011) On farm biogas production: A method to reduce GHG emissions and develop more sustainable livestock operations. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166–167, 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.075
  12. Mwirigi, J.W. Makenzi, P.M. & Ochola, W.O. (2009) Socio-economic constraints to adoption and sustainability of biogas technology by farmers in Nakuru Districts, Kenya. Energy for Sustainable Development, 13(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.05.002
  13. Qu, W. Tu, Q. Bluemling, B. (2013) Which factors are effective for farmers’ biogas use?-Evidence from a large-scale survey in China. Energy Policy. 63, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.019
  14. Rogers, E.M., 1995. Diffusion of innovations, fourth ed. The Free Press, New York
  15. Visser, P.S., Krosnick, J.A., Lavrakas, P.J., 2000. Survey Research, in Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, pp. 223–252
  16. Walekhwa, P.N. Mugisha, J. & Drake, L. (2009) Biogas energy from family-sized digesters in Uganda: Critical factors and policy implications. Energy Policy, 37(7), 2754–2762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.018
  17. Widodo, T.W. Asari, A. Ana, N. & Elita, R. (2009) Design and development of biogas reactor for farmer group scale. Indonesian Journal of Agriculture, 2(2), 121–128

Last update: 2021-06-23 01:01:12

  1. Factors influencing the adoption of innovation in beef cattle farming: A study in Peninsular Malaysia

    Farah Adila Abdullah, Jamal Ali, Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/756/1/012021
  2. Home-cooked energy transitions: Women empowerment and biogas-based cooking technology in Pakistan

    Nazia Yasmin, Philipp Grundmann. Energy Policy, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111074
  3. The Effect of Grinding on Biogas Production from Rice Husk Waste During Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SS-AD)

    E3S Web of Conferences, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020208004
  4. Enhancement of biogas production from rice husk using mechanical pretreatment (grinding) in Liquid Anaerobic Digestion (L-AD)

    E3S Web of Conferences, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020208003
  5. The potential of energy production and greenhouse gases emissions reduction of dairy farm biogas production

    Jatmiko Wahyudi. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 127 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1034/1/012085
  6. An Investigation of the Potential Adoption of Anaerobic Digestion for Energy Production in Irish Farms

    Environments, 8 (2), 2021. doi: 10.3390/environments8020008
  7. Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – The case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan

    Nazia Yasmin, Philipp Grundmann. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101 , 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.011
  8. Empirical study on influencing factors of biogas technology adoption in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Syed M Amir, Yonggong Liu, Ashfaq A Shah, Umer Khayyam, Zafar Mahmood. Energy & Environment, 31 (2), 2020. doi: 10.1177/0958305X19865536
  9. Socio-economic characteristics influencing farmers’ willingness-to-adopt domestic biogas technology in rural Pakistan

    Inayatullah Jan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (16), 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12042-x

Last update: 2021-06-23 01:01:12

  1. Home-cooked energy transitions: Women empowerment and biogas-based cooking technology in Pakistan

    Nazia Yasmin, Philipp Grundmann. Energy Policy, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111074
  2. The Effect of Grinding on Biogas Production from Rice Husk Waste During Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SS-AD)

    E3S Web of Conferences, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020208004
  3. Enhancement of biogas production from rice husk using mechanical pretreatment (grinding) in Liquid Anaerobic Digestion (L-AD)

    E3S Web of Conferences, 127 , 2020. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020208003
  4. An Investigation of the Potential Adoption of Anaerobic Digestion for Energy Production in Irish Farms

    Environments, 8 (2), 2021. doi: 10.3390/environments8020008
  5. Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – The case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan

    Nazia Yasmin, Philipp Grundmann. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101 , 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.011
  6. Empirical study on influencing factors of biogas technology adoption in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Syed M Amir, Yonggong Liu, Ashfaq A Shah, Umer Khayyam, Zafar Mahmood. Energy & Environment, 31 (2), 2020. doi: 10.1177/0958305X19865536
  7. Socio-economic characteristics influencing farmers’ willingness-to-adopt domestic biogas technology in rural Pakistan

    Inayatullah Jan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (16), 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12042-x
  8. The adoption of innovation in ruminant farming for food security in Malaysia: A narrative literature review

    Abdullah F.A.. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (6), 2020. doi: 10.31838/jcr.07.06.130