The Utilization of Water Hyacinth for Biogas Production in a Plug Flow Anaerobic Digester

*Soeprijanto Soeprijanto  -  Department of Industrial Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
I Dewa Ayu Agung Warmadewanthi  -  Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Environmental & Geo Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
Melania Suweni Muntini  -  Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Science, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111,, Indonesia
Arino Anzip  -  Department of Industrial Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Keputih, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
Received: 19 Jan 2019; Revised: 8 Aug 2020; Accepted: 11 Sep 2020; Published: 1 Feb 2021; Available online: 14 Sep 2020.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by CBIORE
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) causes ecological and economic problems because it grows very fast and quickly consumes nutrients and oxygen in water bodies, affecting both the flora and fauna; besides, it can form blockages in the waterways, hindering fishing and boat use. However, this plant contains bioactive compounds that can be used to produce biofuels. This study investigated the effect of various substrates as feedstock for biogas production. A 125-l plug-flow anaerobic digester was utilized and the hydraulic retention time was 14 days; cow dung was inoculated into water hyacinth at a 2:1 mass ratio over 7 days. The maximum biogas yield, achieved using a mixture of natural water hyacinth and water (NWH-W), was 0.398 l/g volatile solids (VS). The cow dung/water (CD-W), hydrothermally pretreated water hyacinth/digestate, and hydrothermally pretreated water hyacinth/water (TWH-W) mixtures reached biogas yields of 0.239, 0.2198, and 0.115 l/g VS, respectively. The NWH-W composition was 70.57% CH4, 12.26% CO2, 1.32% H2S, and 0.65% NH3. The modified Gompertz kinetic model provided data satisfactorily compatible with the experimental one to determine the biogas production from various substrates. TWH-W and NWH-W achieved, respectively, the shortest and (6.561 days) and the longest (7.281 days) lag phase, the lowest (0.133 (l/g VS)/day) and the highest (0.446 (l/g VS)/day) biogas production rate, and the maximum and (15.719 l/g VS) and minimum (4.454 l/g VS) biogas yield potential.

Keywords: Anaerobic digester; biogas; cow dung; hydraulic retention time; water hyacinth

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
In Vol 10, No 1 (2021): February 2021
Statistics: 1056 842
Related articles
The Impact of Hydraulic Retention Time on the Biomethane Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) in Two-Stage Anaerobic Fluidized Bed Reactor Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth (E. crassipes) with Ruminal Slaughterhouse Waste for Biogas Production Performance of Microbial Fuel Cell for Wastewater Treatment and Electricity Generation Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Biogas Production from Cow Dung in A Semi Continuous Anaerobic Digester Kinetic and Enhancement of Biogas Production For The Purpose of Renewable Fuel Generation by Co-digestion of Cow Manure and Corn Straw in A Pilot Scale CSTR System
  1. Abdeshahian, P., Lim, J. S., Ho, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2016). Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 714-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.117
  2. Abral, H., Kadriadi, D., Rodianus, A., Mastariyanto, P., Ilhamdi, Arief, S., Sapuan, S.M. & Ishak, M.R. (2014) Mechanical properties of water hyacinth fibers-polyester composites before and after immersion in water. Materials and Design, 58, 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.043
  3. APHA, AWWA, WPCF, (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Washington D.C
  4. ASTM D 3173-87, 2003. The standard method for determination of moisture content in biomass. Philadelphia, PA: Am. Society for Testing Materials, International
  5. Ayeni, A.O., Adeeyo, O.A., Oresegun, O.M., & Oladimeji, T.E. (2015) Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: Evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 4(4), 14-19
  6. Ayeni, A.O., Omoleye, J.A., Mudliar, S.N., Hymore, F.K. & Pandey, R.A. (2014) Utilization of lignocellulosic Waste for Ethanol production: Enzymatic digestibility and Fermentation of Pretreated Shea Tree Sawdust. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 31(7), 1180-1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0026-2
  7. Bhattacharya, A., & Kumar, P. (2010) Water hyacinth as a potential biofuel crop. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 9, 112-122
  8. Bouallagui, H., Ben Cheikh, R., Marouani, L. & Hamdi, M. (2003) Mesophilic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in a tubular digester. Bioresource Technology, 86(1), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00097-4
  9. Budiyono, Syaichurrozi, I. & Sumardiono, S. (2014) Kinetic Model of Biogas Yield Production from Vinasse at Various Initial pH: Comparison between Modified Gompertz Model and First Order Kinetic Model. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering, and Technology 7(13), 2798-2805. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.602
  10. Charles, W., Walker, L., & Cord-Ruwisch, R. (2009) Effect of pre-aeration and inoculum on the start-up of batch thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Bioresources Technology, 100, 2329-2335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.051
  11. Clesceri, L.S., Eaton, A.D., & Greenberg, A.E. (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edition. American public health association, American water works association, Water environment federation, ISBN 0-87553-235-7
  12. Clementson, C.L., Wilson, D., & Ragobeer, P. (2016) The Bio-methane Potential of the Water Hyacinth (Eichhorniacrassipes). Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(5), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2016.5.031216057
  13. Dasong, D., and Mizi, F. (2010). Characteristic and performance of elementary hemp fibre. Materials Sciences and Applications, 1, 336-345. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2010.16049
  14. Ding, T. Y., Hii, S. L. and Ong, L.G.A. (2012). Comparison of pre-treatment strategies for conversion of coconut husk fiber to fermentable sugars. Bioresources 7(2), 1540-1547. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.2.1540-1547
  15. Ghali, A. E., Marzoug, I. B., Baoubab, M. H. V., & Roudesli, M. S. (2012) Separation and characterization of new cellulose fibres from juncus acutus plant. Bioresources, 7(2), 2002-2018. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.2.2002-2018
  16. Ike, M., Inoue, D., Miyano, T., Liu, T.T., Sei, K., Soda, S., & Kadoshin, S. (2010). Microbial population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic digester treating industrial food waste in Kyoto eco-energy project. Bioresources Technology, 101, 3952-3957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.028
  17. Kim, J.K., Nhat, L., Chun, Y.N., & Kim, S.W. (2008) Hydrogen production condition from food waste by dark fermentation with Clostridium beijerinckii KCTC 1785. Biotechnology Bioprocess Eng., 13, 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-008-0142-0
  18. Kumar, M., Ou, Y.L., & Lin, J.G. (2010) Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio. Waste Management, 30, 602-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.023
  19. Kumar, V., Singh, J., Nadeem, M., Kumar, P. & Pathak, V.V. (2018) Experimental and kinetics studies for biogas production using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) and sugar mill effluent. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0412-9.
  20. Lin, L., Yan, R., Liu, Y., & Jiang, W. (2010) In-depth investigation of enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass wastes based on three major components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Bioresource Technology, 101(21), 8217-8223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.084
  21. Lo, H.M., Kurniawan, T.A., Sillanpaa, M.E.T, Pai, T.Y. & Chiang, C.F. (2010) Modelling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors. Bioresources Technology, 101, 6329-6335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.048
  22. Longjan, G.G., & Dehouche, Z. (2017) Biogas production potential of co-digested food waste and water hyacinth common to the Niger Delta. Biofuels, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1358950
  23. Ludena, L., Fasce, D., Alvarez, V. A., & Stefani, P. M. (2011) Nanocellulose from rice husk following alkaline treatment to remove silica. Bioresources 6(2): 1440-1453
  24. Mata-Alvarez, J., Cecchi, F., Llabrés, P. & Pavan, P. (1999) Anaerobic Digestion of the Barcelona Central Food Market Organic Wastes. Plant Design and Feasibility Study. Bioresource Technology, 42, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(92)90085-C
  25. Matheri, A.N., Ndiweni, S.N., Belaid, M., Muzenda, E., & Hubert, R. (2017) Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 756-764 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.068
  26. Mathew, A.K., Bhui, I., Banerjee, S.N., Goswami, R., Chakraborty, A.K., Shome, A., Balachandran, S., & Chaudhury, S. (2014) Biogas production from locally available aquatic weeds of Santiniketan through anaerobic digestion. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, DOI 10.1007/s10098-014-0877-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0877-6
  27. Monteiro, E., Mantha, V., & Rouboa, A. (2011) Prospective application of farm cattle manure for bioenergy production in Portugal. Renewable Energy, 36, 627-631. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.035
  28. Naik, S., Goud, V.V., Rout, P.K., Jacobson, K., & Dalai, A.K. (2010) Characterization of Canadian biomass for alternative renewable biofuel. Renewable Energy, 35, 1624-1631. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.033.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.08.033
  29. Navarro, A.R., Rubio, M.C., & Maldonado, M.C. (2012) A combined process to treat lemon industry wastewater and produce biogas. Clean Technologies Environmental Policy, 14, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0373-1
  30. Nopharatana, A., Pullammanappallil, P.C., & Clarke, W.P. (2007). Kinetics and Dynamic Modeling of Batch Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste in a Stirred Reactor. Waste Management, 27, 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.04.010
  31. Nur Aimia, M. N., Anuara, H., Nurhafizaha, S. M. & Zakariab, S. (2015) Effects of Dilute Acid Pretreatment on Chemical and Physical Properties of Kenaf Biomass. Journal of Natural Fibers, 12, 256-264, 2015256-264. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2014.919894.https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2014.919894
  32. Opurum C.C., Nweke C.O., Nwanyanwu C.E. & Nwachukwu M.I. (2015) Kinetic Study on Biogas Production from Fish Pond Effluent co-digested with Cow dung in a Batch Bioreactor system. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 4(12), 1-7
  33. O'Sullivan, C., Rounsefell, B., Grinham, A., Clarke W., & Udy, J. (2010) Anaerobic digestion of harvested aquatic weeds: water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), cabomba (Cabomba caroliniana) and salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Ecology Engeneering, 36, 1459-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.027
  34. Patil, J.H., Antony Raj, M.A.L., Shankar, B.B., Shetty, M.K., & Pradeep Kumar, B.P. (2014) Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth and Sheep Waste. Energy Procedia, 52, 572 - 578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.112
  35. Patil, J.H., Raj, M.A., & Gavimath, C.C. (2011) Impact of dilution on biomethanation of fresh water hyacinth. International Journal of Chemical Sciences and Applications, 2, 86-90
  36. Patil, J.H., Raj, M.A., Muralidhara, P.L., Desai, S.M., & Raju, G.K.M. (2012) Kinetics of Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth Using Poultry Litter as Inoculum. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3(2), 94-98. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2012.V3.195
  37. Pachaiyappan, S., Elamvazhuthi, P., Dhamodharan, M., & Sundaram, S. (2014) Biogas production from water hyacinth blended with cow dung. Indian Journal of Energy, 3(1), 134-139
  38. Rao, P.V., Baral, S.S., Dey, R. & Mutnuri, S. (2010) Biogas generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in India. Renew Sust Energ Rrv 14(7), 2086-2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.031
  39. Rico, C., Diego, R., Valcarce, A., & Rico, J.L. (2014) Biogas production from various typical organic wastes generated in the region of cantabria (Spain): methane yields and co-digestion tests. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 5: 128-136. DOI: 10.4236/sgre.2014.56012.https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2014.56012
  40. Rozy, Rouf Ahmad Dar & Urmila Gupta Phutela (2017) Optimization of biogas production from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9 (4), 2062 -2067. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i4.1489
  41. Samuel, J., Gujjala Lohit Kumar, S., & Rintu, B. (2017) Kinetic Modeling of Mixed Culture Process of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Vegetable Wastes with Pistia stratiotes: A Scientific Attempt on Biomethanationy. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology, 9(1), 554-566. DOI: 10.4172/1948-5948.1000341.https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000341
  42. Sharma, A., Aggarwal, N.K., Saini, A., & Yadav, A. (2016) Beyond Biocontrol: Water Hyacinth-Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 9(1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2016.26.48
  43. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., & Templeton, D. (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass: laboratory analytical procedure (LAP). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; NREL Report No.: TP-510-42618. Contract No.: DE-AC36-99-G010337. Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy
  44. Soeprijanto (2019) Biogas Sebagai Energi Terbarukan (Biogas as Renewable Energy). Surabaya ITS Press
  45. Soeprijanto, Mawaddah, J.I., Tauchid, R.W., Fatullah, A.R. & Agustina, S. (2019) Biogas Production from Canteen Wastes Using a Vertical Anaerobic Digester. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Kimia "Kejuangan", (16-1)-(16-6)
  46. Sundari, M. T. & Ramesh, A. (2012) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from the aquatic weed water hyacinth - Eichhornia crassipes, Carbohydrate Polymers, 87, 1701- 1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.076
  47. Thiripura, M. & Ramesh, A. (2012) Isolation and Charactherization of cellulose nanofibers from the equatic weed water hyacinth - Eichhornia crassipes, Journal of Carbohydrate Polymers, 87,1701-1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.076
  48. Trzcinski, A.P., Ray, M.J., and Stuckey, D.C. (2010). Performance of a three-stage membrane bioprocess treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and evolution of its archaeal and bacterial ecology. Bioresources Technology, 101, 1652-1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.075
  49. Vaidyanathan, S., Kavadia, K.M., Shroff, K, C., & Mahajant, S.P. (1985) Biogas production in batch and semicontinuous digesters using water hyacinth. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 28, 905-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260270625
  50. Wei, Y., Li, X., Yu, L.,Zou, D., & Yuan, H. (2015) Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and corn stover with biological and chemical pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 198, 431-436 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.035
  51. Yusuf, M.O.L., Debora, A., & Ogheneruona, D.E. (2011) Ambient Temperature Kinetic Assessment of Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Horse and Cow-dung. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 57, 97−104. https://doi.org/10.17221/25/2010-RAE

Last update: 2021-04-10 04:09:26

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-04-10 04:09:26

No citation recorded.
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by CBIORE
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Articles are freely available to both subscribers and the wider public with permitted reuse.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA). Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.