Two-Phase Expander Approach for Next Generation of Heat Recovery Systems

*Angad S Panesar  -  Advanced Engineering Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brighton, United Kingdom
Marco Bernagozzi  -  Advanced Engineering Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics, University of Brighton, United Kingdom
Received: 11 Sep 2019; Revised: 20 Oct 2019; Accepted: 25 Oct 2019; Published: 27 Oct 2019; Available online: 30 Oct 2019.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Renewable Energy Development

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 543 334
This study presents the numerical adaptations to the semi-empirical expander model in order to examine the feasibility of piston expanders under off-design and two-phase scenarios. This expander model considers supply valve pressure drop, condensation phenomena, heat losses, leakage losses and friction losses. Using Aspen HYSYS©, the expander model is utilised in simulating the next generation of integrated engine cooling and exhaust heat recovery system for future heavy-duty engines. The heat recovery system utilises water-propanol working fluid mixture and consists of independent high pressure (HP) and low pressure (LP) expander. The results of off‑design and two-phase operation are presented in terms of expander efficiency and the different sources of loss, under two distinctive engine speed-load conditions. The heat recovery system, operating with the LP expander at two-phase and the HP expander at superheated condition, represented the design point condition. At the design point, the system provided 15.9 kW of net power, with an overall conversion efficiency of 11.4%, representing 10% of additional engine crankshaft power. At the extreme off-design condition, the two-phase expander operation improved the system performance as a result of the nullification of leakage losses due to the much denser working fluid. The optimised two-phase operation of the LP expander (x=0.55) and the HP expander (x=0.9) at the extreme-off design condition improved the system power by nearly 50% (17.4 vs. 11.7 kW) compared to the reference state. Finally, adapting piston air motors as two-phase expanders for experimental evaluation and reduction in frictional losses was a recommended research direction. ©2019. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved
Two-Phase; Waste Heat Recovery; Piston Expander; Friction; Heat Transfer

Article Metrics:

  1. Amsyari, M., Secretary, C., Badak, P. T., Sutedjo, M., Manager, G., Bahana, P. T. I., … Corporation, E. I. (2007). Using Two-Phase Lng Expanders To Extend Lifetime of Depleting Gas Wells or for Nitrogen Rejection X2. 15th International Conference & Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG 15), 55. Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Automotive Council and Advanced Propulsion Centre. (2018). The Roadmap Report - Towards 2040: a Guide To Automotive Propulsion Technologies. Retrieved from
  3. Bernagozzi, M., Charmer, S., Georgoulas, A., Malavasi, I., Michè, N., & Marengo, M. (2018). Lumped parameter network simulation of a Loop Heat Pipe for energy management systems in full electric vehicles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 141, 617–629.
  4. Bianchi, G., Kennedy, S., Zaher, O., Tassou, S. A., Miller, J., & Jouhara, H. (2017). Two-phase chamber modeling of a twin-screw expander for Trilateral Flash Cycle applications. Energy Procedia, 129, 347–354.
  5. BorgWarner. (2018). Converting Waste Heat into Electrical Energy: BorgWarner’s Organic Rankine Cycle. Auburn Hills.
  6. Chen, S. K., & Flynn, P. F. (1965). Development of a Single Cylinder Compression Ignition Research Engine. National Powerplant and Transportation Meetings.
  7. Derby, M., Lee, H. J., Peles, Y., & Jensen, M. K. (2012). Condensation heat transfer in square, triangular, and semi-circular mini-channels. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55(1–3), 187–197.
  8. Dumont, O., Dickes, R., & Lemort, V. (2017). Extrapolability and limitations of a semi-empirical model for the simulation of volumetric expanders. Energy Procedia, 129, 315–322.
  9. EU Energy Efficiency Plan. (2011). Brussels.
  10. Giuffrida, A. (2017). Improving the semi-empirical modelling of a single-screw expander for small organic Rankine cycles. Applied Energy, 193, 356–368.
  11. Idel’chik, I. E. (1960). Handbook of hydraulic resistance (3rd edition). Washington, 517. 6630
  12. Imran, M., Usman, M., Park, B. S., & Lee, D. H. (2016). Volumetric expanders for low grade heat and waste heat recovery applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1090–1109.
  13. Kanaś, P., Jedlikowski, A., & Anisimov, S. (2019). The influence of geometrical parameters on heat and mass transfer processes in rotary heat exchangers. SN Applied Sciences, 1(6), 1–16.
  14. Lemort, V., Declaye, S., & Quoilin, S. (2012). Experimental characterization of a hermeti scroll expander for use in a micro-scale Rankine cycle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 226(1), 126–136.
  15. Lemort, Vincent, Quoilin, S., Cuevas, C., & Lebrun, J. (2009). Testing and modeling a scroll expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29(14–15), 3094–3102.
  16. Oralli, E., Tarique, M. A., Zamfirescu, C., & Dincer, I. (2011). A study on scroll compressor conversion into expander for Rankine cycles. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 6(3), 200–206.
  17. Panesar, A. S. (2016). An innovative organic Rankine cycle approach for high temperature applications. Energy, 115(March), 1436–1450.
  18. Panesar, A. S. (2017). An innovative Organic Rankine Cycle system for integrated cooling and heat recovery. Applied Energy, 186, 396–407.
  19. Pikra, G., & Rohmah, N. (2019). Comparison of single and double stage regenerative organic Rankine cycle for medium grade heat source through energy and exergy estimation. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 8(2), 141–148.
  20. Qyyum, M. A., Qadeer, K., Lee, S., & Lee, M. (2018). Innovative propane-nitrogen two-phase expander refrigeration cycle for energy-efficient and low-global warming potential LNG production. Applied Thermal Engineering, 139(April), 157–165.
  21. Saghlatoun, S., Zhuge, W., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Review of Expander Selection for Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 4th Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting FEDSM2014 August 3-7, 2014, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  22. Sánta, R. (2012). The Analysis of Two-Phase Condensation Heat Transfer Models Based on the Comparison of the Boundary Condition. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9(6), 167–180.
  23. Shah, M. M. (2009). An Improved and Extended General Correlation for Heat Transfer During Condensation. Hvac&R Research, 15(September 2009), 37–41.
  24. Tchanche, B. F., Lambrinos, G., Frangoudakis, A., & Papadakis, G. (2011). Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles - A review of various applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3963–3979.
  25. Vasuthevan, H., & Brümmer, A. (2016). Thermodynamic Modeling of Screw Expander in a Trilateral Flash Cycle. 23rd International Compressor Engineering Conference.