DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.48269

Optimization and Analysis of a Low-Pressure Water Scrubbing Biogas Upgrading System via the Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology Approaches

1Department of Energy Technology, School of Engineering and Technology, Kenyatta University, Kenya, Kenya

2Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Kenyatta University, Kenya

3School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Pwani University, Kenya, Kenya

Received: 11 Aug 2022; Revised: 27 Sep 2022; Accepted: 12 Oct 2022; Available online: 19 Oct 2022; Published: 1 Jan 2023.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Biogas upgrading is essential in order to increase the calorific value and improve the quality of raw biogas. This present study aims at investigating the optimum performance of a near atmospheric pressure water scrubbing (NAPWS) system for biogas upgrading while using both the adsorption and absorption techniques. This was achieved through a two-stage process: namely, the Taguchi approach followed by the response surface methodology (RSM). The Taguchi orthogonal array design consisted of 27 runs where the raw biogas pressure (10 - 30 kPa), liquid flow rates (2.6 - 4.2 l/ min.) and variations of the steel wool height (0 - 45.72 cm) in the adsorption column were experimentally studied with respect to the methane (CH4) yield and removal efficiency of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2). From the experiments, the removal efficiency of hydrogen sulfide was greater than 87% with the average bio-methane content of 77.67%. During the second-stage, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the RSM were undertaken for optimization of the process parameters. The optimum bio-methane concentration of 84.71 (%v/v) CH4 and 13.31 (%v/v) CO2 was attained at gas pressure of 14kPa, liquid flow rate of 4.2 l/min., and steel wool height at 22.86cm obtained through numerical optimization. These results revealed that the utilization of the Taguchi and the RSM yielded to the best optimal system performance with the liquid flow rate as the most significant factor
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Biogas upgrading; Biogas yield; Packings; Taguchi method; Response surface methodology.
Funding: The German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Experimental Study of Rice Husk Fluidization Without a Sand Bed Material on a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Thermal Performance of Double Pass Solar Air Heater With Tubular Solar Absorber The Conductivity Enhancement of 1.5Li2O-P2O5 Solid Electrolytes by Montmorillonite Addition The Various Designs of Storage Solar Collectors: A Review More recent articles
Most cited articles
Energy Resource of Charcoals Derived from Some Tropical Fruits Nuts Shells Economic feasibility of large scale PV water pumping applications utilizing real field data for a case study in Jordan Generating Organic Liquid Products from Catalytic Cracking of Used Cooking Oil over Mechanically Mixed Catalysts Performance Study of a Floricultural Greenhouse Surrounded by Shallow Water Ponds Investigating the effect of DG infeed on the effective cover of distance protection scheme in mixed-MV distribution network More cited articles
  1. Abdeen, F. R. H., Mel, M., Jami, M. S., Ihsan, S. I., & Ismail, A. F. (2018). Improvement of Biogas Upgrading Process using Chemical Absorption at Ambient Conditions. Jurnal Teknologi, 80(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/ 10.11113/jt.v80.10382
  2. Armah, E., Chetty, M., & Deenadayalu, N. (2020). Biogas production from sugarcane bagasse with South African industrial wastewater and novel kinetic study using response surface methodology. Scientific African, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00556
  3. Awe, O. W., Zhao, Y., Nzihou, A., Minh, D. P., & Lyczko, N. (2017). A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies. Waste and Biomass Valorization 8(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4
  4. Bauer, F., Hulteberg, C., Persson, T., & Tamm, D. (2013). Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies. Swedish Gas Center Report SGC 2013:270 Available at http://vav.griffel.net/filer/C_SGC2013-270.pdf (Last access August 2017)
  5. Benizri, D., Dietrich, N., Labeyrie, P., & Hébrard, G. (2019). A compact, economic scrubber to improve farm biogas upgrading systems. Separation and Purification Technology, 219, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.02.054
  6. Budzianowski, W. M., Wylock, C. E., & Marciniak, P. A. (2017). Power requirements of biogas upgrading by water scrubbing and biomethane compression: comparative analysis of various plant configurations. Energy Conversion and Management, 141, 2–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.018
  7. Djimtoingar, S. S., Derkyi, A., Kuranchie, F., & Yankyera, J. K. (2022). A review of response surface methodology for biogas process optimization. Cogent Engineering, 9(2115283). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2115283
  8. Gantina, T. M., Iriani, P., Maridjo, & Wachjoe, C. K. (2020). Biogas purification using water scrubber with variations of water flow rate and biogas pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1450(012011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1450/1/012011
  9. Hegely, L., Roesler, J., Alix, P., Rouzineau, D., & Meyer, M. (2017). Absorption methods for the determination of mass transfer parameters of packing internals: A literature review. AIChE Journal, 63(8), 3246–3275; https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15737
  10. Ilyas, S. Z. (2006). A Case Study to Bottle the Biogas in Cylinders As Source of Power for Rural Industries Development in Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal, 1(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1481(96)88447-3
  11. IRENA. (2016). Measuring small-scale biogas capacity and production. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi
  12. Kapoor, R., Ghosh, P., Kumar, M., & Vijay, V. K. (2019). Evaluation of biogas upgrading technologies and future perspectives: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04767-1
  13. Kapoor, R., Subbarao, P. M. V, Kumar, V., Shah, G., Sahota, S., Singh, D., & Verma, M. (2017). Factors affecting methane loss from a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading system. Applied Energy, 208, 1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.017
  14. Kister, H. Z., Mathias, P. M., Steinmeyer, E. D., Penney, W. R., Crocker, B. B., & Fair, J. R. (2008). Equipment for Distillation, Gas Absorption, Phase Dispersion, and Phase Separation. In D. W. Green & R. H. Perry (Eds.), Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (8th ed., pp. 14-1-14–57). McGraw-Hill
  15. Kolev, N., Nakov, S., Ljutzkanov, L., & Kolev, D. (2006). Comparison of the Effective Surface Area of Some Highly Effective Random Packings Third and Forth Generation. IChemE Symposium series, 152, 754–763; https://folk.ntnu.no/skoge/prost/proceedings/distillation06/CD-proceedings/paper073.pdf
  16. Madondo, N. I., Rathilal, S., & Bakare, B. F. (2022). Utilization of Response Surface Methodology in Optimization and Modelling of a Microbial Electrolysis Cell for Wastewater Treatment Using Box – Behnken Design Method. Catalysts, 12(1052). https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.3390/catal12091052
  17. Manmai, N., Unpaprom, Y., & Ramaraj, R. (2020). Bioethanol production from sunflower stalk: application of chemical and biological pretreatments by response surface methodology (RSM). Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00602-7
  18. Manmai, N., Unpaprom, Y., Ponnusamy, V., & Ramaraj, R. (2020). Bioethanol production from the comparison between optimization of sorghum stalk and sugarcane leaf for sugar production by chemical pretreatment and enzymatic degradation. Fuel, 278, 118262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118262
  19. Mel, M., Ibrahim, M. M. A., & Setyobudi, R. H. (2016). Preliminary study of biogas upgrading and purification by pressure swing adsorption. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1755, 130010–130011–130010–130015. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958554
  20. Mohanakrishnan, L., & Kurian, J. (2016). Chemical Scrubbing for removal of CO2 from Biogas using Algae and H2S using Sponge Iron. International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering, 4(2), 35–41
  21. Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2003). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (W. Anderson, J. Welter, & N. M. Pigliucci (eds.); 3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799408928333
  22. Morero, B., Groppelli, E., & Campanella, E. (2017). Evaluation of biogas upgrading technologies using a response surface methodology for process simulation Related papers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.167
  23. Nguyen, K. D. M., Imai, T., Yoshida, W., Dang, T. L., Higuchi, T., Kanno, A., Yamamoto, K., & Sekine, M. (2017). Performance of a Carbon Dioxide Removal Process Using a Water Scrubber with the Aid of a Water-Film-Forming Apparatus. Waste and Biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9951-8
  24. Nock, W. J., Walker, M., Kapoor, R., & Heaven, S. (2014). Modeling the water scrubbing process and energy requirements for CO2 capture to upgrade biogas to biomethane. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 53, 12783–12792. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501280p
  25. Noorain, R., Kindaichi, T., Ozaki, N., Aoi, Y., & Ohashi, A. (2019). Biogas purification performance of new water scrubber packed with sponge carriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214(20), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.209
  26. Pirola, C., Galli, F., Manenti, F., & Bianchi, C. L. (2015). Biogas Upgrading by Physical Water Washing in a Micro-Pilot Absorption Column Conducted at Low Temperature and Pressure. Chemical Engineering Transactions., 43, 1207–1212. doi: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1543202
  27. Rajivgandhi, M. M. C., & Singaravelu, M. (2014). Upgrading Biogas to Biomethane by Physical Absorption Process. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 7(3), 639. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732x.2014.01370.9
  28. Rasi, S., Lantela, J., Veijanen, A., & Rintala, J. (2008). Landfill gas upgrading with countercurrent water wash. Waste Management, 28(9), 1528–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.03.032
  29. Riyadi, U., Kristanto, G. A., & Priadi, C. R. (2018). Utilization of steel wool as removal media of hydrogen sulfide in biogas. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 105(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012026
  30. Shen, Y., Shi, W., Zhang, D., Na, P., & Fu, B. (2018). The removal and capture of CO2 from biogas by vacuum pressure swing process using silica gel. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 27, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.08.001
  31. Singhal, S., Agarwal, S., Arora, S., Sharma, P., & Singhal, N. (2017). Upgrading techniques for transformation of biogas to bio-CNG: a review. International Journal of Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3719
  32. Song, C., Kitamura, Y., & Li, S. (2014). Optimization of a novel cryogenic CO2 capture process by response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 45(4), 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.12.009
  33. Tayar, S. P., Guerrero, S., Hidalgo, L. F., & Denise Bevilaqua. (2019). Evaluation of Biogas Biodesulfurization Using Different Packing Materials. ChemEngineering, 3(27), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering3010027
  34. Tippayawong, N., & Thanompongchart, P. (2010). Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor. Energy, 35(12), 4531–4535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.014
  35. Tran, L. T., Le, T. M., Nguyen, T. M., Tran, Q. T., Le, X. D., Pham, M. Q., Lam, V. T., & Do, M. Van. (2021). Simultaneous removal efficiency of H2S and CO2 by high - gravity rotating packed bed: Experiments and simulation. Open Chemistry, 19, 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0187
  36. Vakili, M., Gholami, Z., & Gholami, F. (2012). Removal of Hydrogen sulfide from gaseous streams by a chemical method using ferric sulfate solution. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(2),241–245. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.19.02.1541
  37. Vijay, V. K., Chandra, R., Subbarao, P. M. V, & Kapdi, S. S. (2006). Biogas Purification and Bottling into CNG Cylinders: Producing Bio-CNG from Biomass for Rural Automotive Applications. The 2nd Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE 2006)” 21-23 November, Bangkok, Thailand
  38. Walozi, R., Nabuuma, B., & Sebiti, A. (2016). Application of Low Pressure Water Scrubbing Technique for Increasing Methane Content in Biogas. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(2), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2016.040206
  39. Wang, K., Chen, J., Huang, Y., & Huang, S. (2013). Integrated Taguchi method and response surface methodology to confirm hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation of cow manure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.155
  40. Yousef, A. M. I., Eldrainy, Y. A., El-Maghlany, W. M., & Attia, A. (2016). Upgrading biogas by a low-temperature CO2 removal technique. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55, 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.026

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-19 15:19:07

No citation recorded.