DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.49775

The Role of Membrane, Feed Characteristic and Process Parameters on RED Power Generation

1Membrane Research Center (MeR-C), Diponegoro University, Indonesia

2Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

3Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

4 Departement of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 20 Oct 2022; Revised: 5 Dec 2022; Accepted: 20 Dec 2022; Available online: 31 Dec 2022; Published: 1 Jan 2023.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Reverse electrodialysis (RED) is a renewable energy-generating SGE technique using energy from salinity gradients. This research investigates the effect of membrane and feed characteristics on reverse electrodialysis (RED) power generation. Some investigations on the process parameters effect for the complement of the main study were also conducted. The generated power of RED was measured using power density analysis. The experiments were performed using artificial seawater varied from 0 to 1 g/L NaCl for diluted salt water and from 0 to 40 g/L NaCl for concentrated salt water. In a study of ions type, NaCl non-pa is used to represent monovalent ions, and MgSO4 represents divalent ions. The results showed that the highest voltage generation is 2.004 volts by 14 cells number of the RED membrane utilizing a RED self-made laboratory scale. The power density was enhanced by raising the flow rate (0.10 L/min), concentration difference (40 g/L), and the presence of electrode rinse solution. Further, the ion type (monovalent, divalent, and multivalent) influenced the resulting RED power density, where the divalent ion (MgSO4) 's power density was greater than that of the monovalent ion (NaCl). The resistance and selectivity of the membrane were the major keys for the power generation of RED
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Reverse electrodialysis; power density; salinity gradient energy; Gibb free energy

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Monitoring of Heat Flux Energy in the Northernmost Part of Sumatra Volcano Using Landsat 8 and Meteorological Data An Effect of Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Performance Consistent Regime-Switching Lasso Model of the Biomass Proximate Analysis Higher Heating Value The Various Designs of Storage Solar Collectors: A Review More recent articles
Most cited articles
Analysing the potential of retrofitting ultra-low heat loss triple vacuum glazed windows to an existing UK solid wall dwelling Economic Benefit and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of A Family-Scale Cowdung Anaerobic Biogas Digester Determinants of CO2 Emissions in Emerging Markets: An Empirical Evidence from MINT Economies Comparative Analysis of Biodiesels from Calabash and Rubber Seeds Oils Enhancement and Optimization Mechanisms of Biogas Production for Rural Household Energy in Developing Countries: A review More cited articles
  1. Handaja, S., Susanto, H., Hermawan, H. (2021) Electrical conductivity of carbon electrodes by mixing carbon rod and electrolyte paste of spent battery. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(2), 221-227; https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2021.31637
  2. Hong, J.G., Zhang, W., Luo, J., Chen, Y. (2013) Modeling of power generation from the mixing of simulated saline and freshwater with a reverse electrodialysis system: The effect of monovalent and multivalent ions. Applied Energy, 110, 244-251; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.015
  3. Li, J., Zhang, C., Wang, Z., Bai, Z., & Kong, X. (2022). Salinity gradient energy harvested from thermal desalination for power production by reverse electrodialysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115043
  4. Mei, Y., & Tang, C. Y. (2018, January 1). Recent developments and future perspectives of reverse electrodialysis technology: A review. Desalination. Elsevier B.V, 425, 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.021
  5. Naidu, G., Jeong, S., Vigneswaran, S. (2015) Interaction of humic substances on fouling in membrane distillation for seawater desalination. Chemical Engineering Journal, 262, 946–957; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.060
  6. Ortiz-Imedio, R., Gomez-Coma, L., Fallanza, M., Ortiz, A., Ibañez, R., & Ortiz, I. (2019). Comparative performance of Salinity Gradient Power-Reverse Electrodialysis under different operating conditions. Desalination, 457, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.005
  7. Post, J.W. (2009) Blue Energy: electricity production from salinity gradients by reverse electrodialysis, Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen The Netherlands, ISBN 978-90-8585-510-1, 222pp
  8. Samsudin, A. M., Wolf, S., Roschger, M., & Hacker, V. (2021). Poly(Vinyl alcohol)-based anion exchange membranes for alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(3), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2021.33168
  9. Shadravan, A., Amani, M., & Jantrania, A. (2022). Feasibility of thin film nanocomposite membranes for clean energy using pressure retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis. Energy Nexus, 7, 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100141
  10. Simões, C., Vital, B., Sleutels, T., Saakes, M., & Brilman, W. (2022). Scaled-up multistage reverse electrodialysis pilot study with natural waters. Chemical Engineering Journal, 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138412
  11. Susanto, H., Fitrianingtyas, M., Samsudin, A. M., Syakur, A. (2017). Experimental study of the natural organic matters effect on the power generation of reverse electrodialysis. International Journal of Energy Research, 41(10), 1474–1486; https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3728
  12. Topal, L., Kirchner, C.N., Germer, W., Zobel, M., & Dyck, A. (2014). Evaluation of Cathode Gas Composition and Temperature Influences on Alkaline Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (AAEMFC) Performance. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 3(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.3.1.65-72
  13. Turek, M., Bandura, B. (2007) Renewable energy by reverse electrodialysis. Desalination, 205, 67–74; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.041
  14. Turek, M., Bandura, B., Dydo, P. (2008) Power production from coal-mine brine utilizing reversed electrodialysis. Desalination, 221, 462-466; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.106
  15. Veerman, J., Saakes, M., Metz, S.J., Harmsen, G.J. (2009a) Reverse electrodialysis: performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water. Journal of Membrane Science, 327, 136–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.015
  16. Veerman, J., de Jong, R.M., Saakes, M., Metz, S.J., Harmsen, G.J. (2009b) Reverse electrodialysis: Comparison of six commercial membrane pairs on the thermodynamic efficiency and power density. Journal of Membrane Science, 343, 7–15; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.047
  17. Veerman, J., Saakes, M., Metz, S.J., Harmsen, G.J. (2010) Reverse electrodialysis: evaluation of suitable electrodesystems. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 40, 1461-1474; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-010-0124-8
  18. Veerman, J. (2020). Reverse electrodialysis: Co-and counterflow optimization of multistage configurations for maximum energy efficiency. Membranes, 10(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090206
  19. Vermaas, D.A., Guler, E., Saakes, M., Nijmeijer, K. (2012) Theoretical power density from salinity gradients using reverse electrodialysis. Energy Procedia, 20, 170–184; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.018
  20. Vermaas, D.A., Kunteng, D., Saakes, M., Nijmeijer, K. (2013) Fouling in reverse electrodialysis under natural conditions. Water Research, 47, 1289-1298; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.053
  21. Vermaas, D. A., Veerman, J., Saakes, M., & Nijmeijer, K. (2014). Influence of multivalent ions on renewable energy generation in reverse electrodialysis. Energy and Environmental Science,7, 1434–1445.. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43501f
  22. Weinstein, J.N., Leitz, F.B.J.W. (1976) Electric power from differences in salinity: the dialytic battery. Sci. 191, 557‐559; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.191.4227.557
  23. Yan, H., Peng, K., Yan, J., Jiang, C., Wang, Y., Feng, H., … Xu, T. (2022). Bipolar membrane-assisted reverse electrodialysis for high power density energy conversion via acid-base neutralization. Journal of Membrane Science, 647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120288
  24. Yang, K., & Qin, M. (2021, July 1). The application of cation exchange membranes in electrochemical systems for ammonia recovery from wastewater. Membranes. MDPI AG, 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070494

Last update:

  1. Experimental studies of electrical and mass transfer processes in reverse electrodialysis

    A. A. Chichirov, A. A. Filimonova, N. D. Chichirova, E. S. Mayorov. Power engineering: research, equipment, technology, 25 (4), 2023. doi: 10.30724/1998-9903-2023-25-4-53-70

Last update: 2024-07-17 19:21:45

No citation recorded.