skip to main content

Prospects of low carbon development for Pakistan’s energy and power sector in the post Covid scenario

1Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad, Pakistan

2Mechanical Engineering Department, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Sialkot, Pakistan

Received: 30 Oct 2022; Revised: 2 Apr 2023; Accepted: 17 May 2023; Available online: 29 May 2023; Published: 15 Jul 2023.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
In the backdrop of COVID19 recovery, Pakistan is still struggling to cope with the economic challenges and disruptions caused in the energy supply chain. On one hand where COVID has brought serious socio-economic costs and prolonged delays, it has also provided opportunity for developing countries such as Pakistan to “build-forward-better” their economies in a more sustainable and climate friendly manner. This study particularly highlights the impact of COVID on energy supply and demand sectors of Pakistan, its near- and long-term impacts, and what policy interventions can be adopted to put Pakistan on-track to achieve its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). The economic focus in on “Green Recovery” and what key interventions will foster a rapid transition towards decarbonization in Pakistan. Low Emission Analysis Platform (LEAP) model is used to provide energy sector outlook (2020-2040) of Pakistan under different scenario i.e., Pre COVID growth, Business-as-Usual, Slow Recovery, and Green Recovery from COVID. The results obtained from the model depicts that following a green recovery scenario, Pakistan can reduce around 10 Mtoe (9%) of its total energy use, 53 TWh of electricity, 19 Mt of emissions from demand sectors, and 11 Mt of emissions from the power sector by 2030. For total levelized cost of the power sector, the green recovery scenario represents a generation cost of $13 billion by 2030 which further highlights that energy efficiency could lead to cost savings of approximately $3 billion each year by 2030. Green recovery is however still a daunting task as it would require economic stimulus of $8 billion only to recover to its pre COVID scenario and total investments of $120 billion by 2030.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Energy Modeling; Renewable Energy; Green Recovery; Clean Energy Transition; LEAP

Article Metrics:

  1. AEDB (2019) Alternative and Renewable Energy Policy 2019. Available at:
  2. Agency, I. E. (2021) World Energy Outlook 2021.Available at:
  3. Akinbami, J.-F. K. (2001) Renewable energy resources and technologies in Nigeria: present situation, future prospects and policy framework, Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 6(2), pp. 155–182
  4. Armstrong, M. (2021) The price of solar power has fallen by over 80%.Available at:
  5. Arora, N. K. and Mishra, I. (2021) COP26: more challenges than achievements, Environmental Sustainability. Springer,585–588.
  6. Aslam, H., Nazir, A. and Zia, U. (2022) Green recovery from COVID-19: Outlook for Pakistan’s Energy and Power Sector. Available at:
  7. Aslam, H., Nazir, A. and Zia, U. (2021) Pakistan’s Way Forward towards a Green Economy: Perspectives for a Clean Energy Transition. Available at:
  8. Aslam, H., Nazir, A. and Zia, U. ur R. (2021) Prospects of Coal Investments and Potential of Renewable Energy Transition in Thar Region of Pakistan. Policy Review. Available at:
  9. Aslam, H. and Sheikh, N. (2020) Impact assessment of COVID-19 on Energy and Power Sector of Pakistan. Available at:
  10. Bernstein, M., Hassell, S. and Hagen, J. (1999) Developing countries and global climate change: electric power options for growth. RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA. Available at:
  11. Capros, P., Zazias, G., Evangelopoulou, S., Kannavou, M., Fotiou, T., Siskos, P., De Vita, A. and Sakellaris, K., (2019). Energy-system modelling of the EU strategy towards climate-neutrality. Energy Policy, 134, 110960.
  12. Chen, W. and Wu, Z. (2001) Study on China’s future sustainable energy development strategy using MARKAL model, Journal of Tsinghua University. Science and Technology, 41(12), 103–106.
  13. Climate Transparency (2020) Pakistan: Climate Transparency Report 2020, (July), pp. 1–20. Available at:
  14. Conzelmann, G. and Koritarov, V. (2008) Turkey energy and environmental review-Task 7 energy sector modeling: executive summary. Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  15. Diaz-Camal, N., Cardoso-Vera, J.D., Islas-Flores, H., Gómez-Oliván, L.M. and Mejía-García, A., (2022). Consumption and ocurrence of antidepressants (SSRIs) in pre-and post-COVID-19 pandemic, their environmental impact and innovative removal methods: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 829, 154656.
  16. Economics, T. (2020) Pakistan - Urban Population (% Of Total). Available at:,compiled%20from%20officially%20recognized%20sources
  17. Germanwatch (2021) Global Climate risk index. Available at:
  18. GoP-CCD (2013) Framework for Implementation of Climate Change Policy (2014-2030), (November 2013), pp. 1–93. Available at:
  19. Group, T. W. B. (2020) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) - Pakistan
  20. Gul, M. and Qureshi, W. A. (2012) Modeling diversified electricity generation scenarios for Pakistan, in 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE, 1–7.
  21. Hainoun, A., Aldin, M. S. and Almoustafa, S. (2010) Formulating an optimal long-term energy supply strategy for Syria using MESSAGE model, Energy policy, 38(4), 1701–1714.
  22. Heinrich, G., Basson, L., Cohen, B., Howells, M. and Petrie, J. (2007). Ranking and selection of power expansion alternatives for multiple objectives under uncertainty, Energy, 32(12), 2350–2369.
  23. Herdinie, S. S. and Sartono, E. (2003) The role of nuclear power and other energy options in competitive electricity market study using message model, Jurnal Pengembangan Energi Nuklir, 5(1).
  24. Hina Aslam, Vaqar Ahmed, Michael Williamson, Faran Rana, U. ur R. Z. (2020) Reform Priorities for Pakistan’s Energy Sector: Perspectives in the Backdrop of Paris Agreement.Available at:
  25. Huang, Y., Bor, Y. J. and Peng, C.-Y. (2011) The long-term forecast of Taiwan’s energy supply and demand: LEAP model application, Energy policy, 39(11), 6790–6803.
  26. IEA (2022) World Energy Outlook 2022’. IEA, Paris, France. Available at:
  27. IMF (no date) Policy Response to Covid 19, 2020. Available at:
  28. IPCC (2014) AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014.
  29. Ismail, A. (2019) Competitive Trading Bilateral Contract Market (CTBCM).
  30. Javed, S. A. (2021) Socioeconomic Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in South Asia: Fiscal Policy Response and Fiscal Needs for Supporting the Economic Recovery. Islamabad. Available at:
  31. Kadian, R., Dahiya, R. P. and Garg, H. P. (2007) Energy-related emissions and mitigation opportunities from the household sector in Delhi, Energy Policy, 35(12), 6195–6211.
  32. Kiani, K. (2021) Circular debt to remain over Rs1.1tr by 2023. Available at:
  33. Macrotrends (2021) Pakistan GDP 1960-2022
  34. Ministry of Industries and Production Government of Pakistan (2020) Electric Vehicle Policy 2020-2025, pp. 2–3. Available at: 23HCV 130620 PDF.pdf
  35. Mirjat, N.H., Uqaili, M.A., Harijan, K., Walasai, G.D., Mondal, M.A.H. and Sahin, H., (2018), Long-term electricity demand forecast and supply side scenarios for Pakistan (2015–2050): A LEAP model application for policy analysis, Energy, 165, 512–526.
  36. Mirsagedis, S., Conzelmann, G., Georgopoulou, E., Koritarov, V. and Sarafidis, Y. (2004) Longterm GHG emissions outlook for Greece, in Proceedings of the 6th IAEE European conference on modelling in energy economics and policy. Zurich, Switzerland. Citeseer, pp. 2–3. Available at:
  37. MoCC (2021) Pakistan Updated NDC 2021
  38. MoPD&R (2014) Pakistan 2025: One Nation-One Vision. Available at:
  39. Mustafa, K. (2021) Draft National Electricity Policy 2020: Full cost of service not to be recovered from consumers
  40. NEECA (2020) NEECA strategic plan 2020-23. Available at: Strategic Plan 2020-23 Final 28 October 2020(1).pdf
  41. NEPRA (2021) NEPRA State of Industry Report 2021. Available at: of Industry Reports.php
  42. Nicolini, G., Antoniella, G., Carotenuto, F., Christen, A., Ciais, P., Feigenwinter, C., Gioli, B., Stagakis, S., Velasco, E., Vogt, R. and Ward, H.C., (2022). Direct observations of CO2 emission reductions due to COVID-19 lockdown across European urban districts’, Science of the Total Environment, 830, p. 154662.
  43. NTDC (2022) Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion Plan (IGCEP) 2022-31. Available at: Notices/2021/06 June/IGCEP 2021.pdf
  44. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2017). Available at:
  45. Pakistan Economic Survey 2020-21 (2021).
  46. Pakistan Energy Year Book, 2020 (2020). Pakistan
  47. PAMA (2021a) Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association: PAMA: Monthly Purchase.
  48. PAMA (2021b) Vehicle production data of pakistan
  49. PBS (2019) Economic Survey of Pakistan 2019-20.
  50. Perwez, U., Sohail, A., Hassan, S.F. and Zia, U. (2015) The long-term forecast of Pakistan’s electricity supply and demand: An application of long range energy alternatives planning, Energy, 93, 2423–2435.
  51. Phdungsilp, A. (2010) Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: Policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok, Energy Policy, 38(9), pp. 4808–4817.
  52. Rashid, T. ur (2016) Energy Modeling and Policy Analysis of Pakistan’s Residential Energy System. Available at:
  53. Rehman, S.A.U., Cai, Y., Fazal, R., Das Walasai, G. and Mirjat, N.H., (2017) An integrated modeling approach for forecasting long-term energy demand in Pakistan, Energies, 10(11), 1868.
  54. Rosane, O. (2022) Record-breaking heat wave strains ‘limits of human survivability’ in India and Pakistan
  55. Saradhi, I. V, Pandit, G. G. and Puranik, V. D. (2009) Energy supply, demand and environmental analysis-a case study of Indian energy scenario, International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 1(3), 115–120
  56. Senthilkumar, V. S., Reddy, K. S. and Subramaniam, U. (2020) COVID-19: Impact analysis and recommendations for power and energy sector operation, Appl. Energy, 279, 115739.
  57. Shin, H.C., Park, J.W., Kim, H.S. and Shin, E.S., (2005) Environmental and economic assessment of landfill gas electricity generation in Korea using LEAP model, Energy policy, 33(10), 1261–1270.
  58. Song, H.J., Lee, S., Maken, S., Ahn, S.W., Park, J.W., Min, B. and Koh, W., (2007) Environmental and economic assessment of the chemical absorption process in Korea using the LEAP model, Energy Policy, 35(10), 5109–5116.
  59. Steffen, B., Egli, F., Pahle, M. and Schmidt, T.S., 2020 ‘Navigating the clean energy transition in the COVID-19 crisis’, Joule, 4(6), 1137–1141
  60. UNESCAP and Climate Analytics (2021) Coal phase out and energy transition pathways for Asia and the Pacific. Available at:
  61. UNIDO (2020) Impact assessment of Covid 19 on Pakistan’s manufacturing Firms.
  62. Zia, U.U.R., ur Rashid, T., Awan, W.N., Hussain, A. and Ali, M., (2020), Quantification and technological assessment of bioenergy generation through agricultural residues in Punjab ( Pakistan ), Biomass and Bioenergy, 139, 105612.
  63. Waleed, H. (2020) Electricity demand may reduce by 30pc if impact of Covid-19 continues: PEPCO, April. Available at:
  64. Zia, U.R.; Zulfiqar, M., Azram, U., Haris, M., Khan, M.A. and Zahoor, M.O., (2019) Use of Macro/Micro Models and Business Intelligence tools for Energy Assessment and Scenario based Modeling’, in 2019 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Sciences and Technology (ICEEST), pp. 1–7.
  65. Zia, U. ur R. and Aslam, H. (2022) Market Preparedness and Socio-economic prospects of Electric Vehicles in Pakistan.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2023-11-28 09:37:17

No citation recorded.