DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.22.3.294-303

Analisis Jaringan Stakeholder pada Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun Rumah Sakit di Jakarta

1Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia, Jalan Salemba Raya No.4 Jakarta Pusat 10430, Indonesia

2Direktorat Jendral Pengelolaan Sampah, Limbah dan Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta Timur 13410, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2023 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang: Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (LB3) rumah sakit di Jakarta masih menjadi permasalahan yang kompleks, terutama pada masa Covid-19. Apabila tidak ditangani dengan baik akan berpotensi sebagai media penyebaran virus. Pengelolaan tersebut memerlukan identifikasi LB3 dan kerjasama pengelolaan dari pemangku kepentingan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis jumlah dan jenis LB3, membandingkan kinerja pelaksanaan pengelolaan limbah dan menganalisis jaringan pemangku kepentingan dalam mengelola LB3 rumah sakit di Jakarta.

Metode: Desain penelitian kuantitatif digunakan untuk menjawab tujuan penelitian. Analisis deskriptif digunakan untuk menggambarkan jumlah limbah dan pengelolaan LB3 medis padat dari tahun 2018-2022. Metode Analytical Netwrok Theory (ANT) dengan bantuan perangkat lunak UNICET digunakan untuk menganalisis jaringan pemangku kepentingan dalam pengelolaan limbah di 4 rumah sakit (2 swasta dan 2 pemerintah) di DKI Jakarta.

Hasil: Terjadi peningkatan limbah sebesar 11-264% dengan lebih dari 90% tergolong jenis limbah infeksius pada 4 rumah sakit yang diteliti. Terdapat 1 rumah sakit swasta dan 1 rumah sakit pemerintah masih memerlukan perbaikan kinerja dalam aspek non teknis pengelolaan yaitu pendataan dan pencatatan, pelaksanaan perizinan, dan pelaksanaan ketentuan dalam izin. Nilai network centralizaiton index 8,81% menunjukkan aktor atau pemangku kepentingan tersebut tidak ada yang mendominasi atau tidak kuatnya sentralitas sebagai fasilitator di dalam jaringan. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup (DLH) adalah pemangku kepentingan yang memiliki kemampuan sebagai fasilitator paling tinggi ke aktor lain yang tidak berhubungan langsung dengannya atau dapat dikatakan bahwa para pemangku kepentingan lain dapat melalui DLH untuk berhubungan dengan aktor lainnya.

Simpulan: Peningkatan LB3 terjadi di 4 rumah sakit yang diteliti sehingga perlu adanya perbaikan kinerja dalam pengelolaan LB3. DLH merupakan pemangku kepentingan yang memiliki peran penting dalam jaringan stakeholder pengolahan LB3 rumah sakit di DKI Jakarta.

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Stakeholder Network Analysis on Hazardous and Toxic Waste Management in Hospitals in Jakarta

Background: Management of Hazardous and Toxic Waste (LB3) in hospitals in Jakarta is still a complex problem, especially during the Covid-19 period. If not handled properly, it will potentially be a medium for spreading the virus. Such management requires the identification of LB3 and management cooperation from stakeholders. This study aims to analyze the amount and type of LB3, compare the performance of waste management implementation and analyze the network of stakeholders in managing LB3 of hospitals in Jakarta.

Methods: Quantitative research design is used to answer research objectives. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the amount of waste and management of solid medical LB3 from 2018-2022. The Analytical Network Theory (ANT) method, with the help of UNICET software, was used to analyze stakeholder networks in waste management in 4 hospitals (2 private and two government) in DKI Jakarta.

Results: There was an increase in waste by 11-264%, with more than 90% classified as infectious waste types in the four hospitals studied. One private hospital and one government hospital still require performance improvement in non-technical management aspects, namely data collection and recording, implementation of permits, and implementation of permit provisions. The network centralization index value of 8.81% indicates that none of these actors or stakeholders dominates or lack centrality as facilitators in the network. The Environmental Agency (DLH) is a stakeholder who has the highest ability as a facilitator to other actors who are not directly related to him, or it can be said that other stakeholders can go through DLH to connect with other actors.

Conclusion: The increase in LB3 occurred in the four hospitals studied, so there is a need for improved performance in LB3 management. DLH is a stakeholder who has an essential role in the LB3 processing stakeholder network of hospitals in DKI Jakarta.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
 CTA
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (726KB)    Indexing metadata
 ES
Etichal Statement
Subject
Type ES
  Download (1MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Limbah B3; Jaringan Stakeholder; Rumah Sakit

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Indek Kualitas Air dan Dampak terhadap Kesehatan Masyarakat Sekitar Sungai Karang Mumus, Samarinda Prevalensi Leptospira Sp. pada Tikus dan Ayam dari Permukiman Padat di Denpasar Selatan, Indonesia Hubungan Kadar Kesadahan dan Fluorida dalam Air Bersih pada Kejadian Penyakit Periodontal di Kecamatan Pundong, Kabupaten Bantul, Yogyakarta Halaman Belakang Halaman Sampul More recent articles
Most cited articles
Faktor Risiko dan Potensi Penularan Tuberkulosis Paru di Kabupaten Kendal , Jawa Tengah Evaluasi Manajemen Limbah Padat Dan Cair Di Rsud Mimika Faktor Lingkungan dan Perilaku Masyarakat yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Filariasis di Kabupaten Sambas Halaman Belakang Faktor Risiko Lingkungandan Kebiasaan Penduduk Berhubungan Dengan Kejadian Filariasis di Distrik Windesi Kabupaten Kepulauan Yapen Provinsi Papua More cited articles
  1. Practice Greenhealth. Hospitals generate over 29 pounds of waste per bed per day. A waste plan is critical for any sustainability programming. [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://practicegreenhealth.org/topics/waste/waste-0
  2. Singh E, Kumar A, Mishra R, Kumar S. Solid waste management during covid-19 pandemic: recovery techniques and responses. Chemosphere 2022, 288(P1):132451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132451
  3. Asian Development Bank. Managing Infectious Medical Waste during the COVID-19 Pandemic. China; 2020
  4. Nugraha C. Tinjauan kebijakan pengelolaan limbah medis infeksius penanganan corona virus disease 2019 (Covid-19). J Untuk Masy Sehat. 2020;4(2):122–6. https://doi.org/10.52643/jukmas.v4i2.1004
  5. Prihartanto. Perkiraan timbulan limbah medis bahan berbahaya dan beracun (B3) dari rumah sakit penanganan pasien covid-19. J Sains dan Teknol Mitigasi Bencana. 2020;15(1):12–8. https://doi.org/10.29122/jstmb.v15i1.4118
  6. World Health Organization. Health-care waste [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste
  7. Wulandari P, Kusnoputranto H. Medical waste management and minimization efforts at public hospital. case study: public hospital in East Jakarta, Indonesia. J Kesehat Masy. 2015;9(2):77–84. https://doi.org/10.12928/kesmas.v9i2.2127
  8. Peraturan Pemerintah RI. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta; 2021
  9. Saxena P, Pradhan IP, Kumar D. Redefining bio medical waste management during covid-19 in india: A way forward. Mater Today Proc. 2022;60:849–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.507
  10. Pramanik SK, Suja FB, Zain S, Pramanik BK. Two-phase covid-19 medical waste transport optimisation considering sustainability and infection probability. J Clean Prod. 2021;100310
  11. Adelodun B, Ajibade FO, Ibrahim RG, Bakare HO, Choi KS. Snowballing transmission of covid-19 (sars-cov-2) through wastewater: any sustainable preventive measures to curtail the scourge in low-income countries? Sci Total Environ. 2020;742:140680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140680
  12. Nurwahyuni NT, Fitria L, Umboh O, Katiandagho D. Pengolahan limbah medis covid-19 pada rumah sakit. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2020;10(2):52–9. https://doi.org/10.47718/jkl.v10i2.1162
  13. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. Nomor 6 tentang tata cara dan persyaratan pengelolaan limbah bahan berbahaya dan beracun. Jakarta; 2021
  14. Sukmawati, Dahlan M. Manajemen Pengelolaan limbah rumah sakit umum daerah polewali di masa pandemi covid-19. J Ilmu Kesehat. 2022;5(2):112. https://doi.org/10.33006/ji-kes.v5i2.326
  15. Syafei AN, Utomo SW, Izzati L. Pengelolaan limbah B3 Medis covid-19 dari rumah sakit di Kota Tangerang. J Ilmu Kesehat Masy. 2023;12(03):190–201. https://doi.org/10.33221/jikm.v12i03.2072
  16. Kriswibowo A, Wahyuningtiyas A, Kusmayadi NW, Prasetyo K. Kerjasama pemerintah dan swasta dalam pengelolaan limbah medis covid-19 di Kota Madiun. Public Inspir J Adm Publik. 2021;6(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.22225/pi.6.1.2021.8-18
  17. Ulfimora FA, Abidin Z, Ismayana A. Analisis kinerja pengelolaan limbah infeksius selama masa pandemi covid-19 studi kasus di RSUD kota depok perfomance analysis of infectious waste management during the covid-19 pandemic case study at depok city general hospital. J Pengendali Pencemaran Lingkung. 2023;5(1):10–20. https://doi.org/10.35970/jppl.v5i1.1473
  18. Yudianto T, Setyono P, Handayani IGAKR. Implementasi kebijakan dan strategi dalam pengelolaan sampah di Kabupaten Blora. J Kesehat Lingkung Indones. 2021;20(1):21–6. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.20.1.21-26
  19. Berrou Y, Soulier E. A Methodology to analyze the development of local energy communities based on socio-energetic nodes and actor-network theory. Procedia Comput Sci. 2023;219:439–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.310
  20. Lefkowitz D. Black boxes and information pathways: an actor-network theory approach to breast cancer survivorship care. Soc Sci Med. March 2022;307(115184). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115184
  21. Bilodeau A, Chabot C, Martin N, Di Sante M, Bertrand L, Potvin L. A midrange theory of local cross-sector action based on the actor-network theory. SSM - Qual Res Heal. November 2022;2(100199). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100199
  22. Hasiana D, Safira T, Fathun LM. Limbah medis pada covid-19 di Indonesia: Faktor kompleksitas dan upaya reformasi. J Sentris. 2021;2(2):152–65. https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v2i2.4999.152-165
  23. Capoor MR, Parida A. Current perspectives of biomedical waste management in context of covid-19. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021;39(2):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.03.003
  24. Dihan MR, Abu Nayeem SM, Roy H, Islam MS, Islam A, Alsukaibi AKD, et al. Healthcare waste in Bangladesh: Current status, the impact of Covid-19 and sustainable management with life cycle and circular economy framework. Sci Total Environ. November 2023;871(162083). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162083
  25. Martinez R, Masron IN. Jakarta: A city of cities. Cities. May 2020;106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102868
  26. Lemma H, Asefa L, Gemeda T, Dhengesu D. Infectious medical waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic in public hospitals of West Guji zone, southern Ethiopia. Clin Epidemiol Glob Heal. October 2022;15:101037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101037
  27. Takeuchi E, Katanoda K, Cheli S, Goldzweig G, Tabuchi T. Restrictions on healthcare utilization and psychological distress among patients with diseases potentially vulnerable to COVID-19. Heal Psychol Behav Med. 2022;10(1):229–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2037429
  28. Ngoc S mai V, Nguyen M anh, Nguyen T lam, Vu H. covid-19 and environmental health: a systematic analysis for the global burden of biomedical waste by this epidemic. Case Studies in Chem and Environ Eng 6. January 2022;100245:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100245
  29. World Health Organization. Tonnes of covid-19 health care waste expose urgent need to improve waste management systems. Geneva; 2022
  30. Valonda D, Hermawati E. Pengelolaan limbah medis padat rumah sakit pada masa pandemi covid-19 di RSUD Koja Jakarta. Avicenna J Ilm. 2022;17(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.36085/avicenna.v17i1.2751
  31. Haque MS, Uddin S, Sayem SM, Mohib KM. Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) induced waste scenario: A short overview. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(1):104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104660
  32. Das AK, Islam MN, Billah MM, Sarker A. COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare solid waste management strategy–a mini-review. Sci Total Environ. 2021;778:146220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146220
  33. Derraik JGB, Anderson WA, Connelly EA, Anderson YC. Rapid review of sars-cov-1 and sars-cov-2 viability, susceptibility to treatment, and the disinfection and reuse of ppe, particularly filtering facepiece respirators. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176117
  34. Jessop ZM, Dobbs TD, Ali SR, Combellack E, Clancy R, Ibrahim N, et al. Personal protective equipment for surgeons during COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of availability, usage and rationing. Br J Surg. 2020;107(10):1262–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11750
  35. Latour B. On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Philos Lit J Logos. 2017;27(1):173–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-173-197
  36. Le HT, Quoc K Le, Nguyen TA, Dang KT, Vo HK, Luong HH, et al. medical-waste chain: a medical waste collection, classification and treatment management by blockchain technology. Computers. 2022;11(7):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11070113
  37. Salvia G, Zimmermann N, Willan C, Hale J, Gitau H, Muindi K, et al. The wicked problem of waste management: An attention-based analysis of stakeholder behaviours. J Clean Prod. December 2021;326(129200):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129200

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-18 14:02:15

No citation recorded.