skip to main content

Risk Identification of Hazardous Biological and Chemical Substances in Work Safety Efforts

1Program Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Pascasarjana, Universitas Jember 68121, Indonesia

2Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Jember 68121, Indonesia

3Drug Utilisation and Discovery Research Group, Fakultas Farmasi, Universitas Jember 68121, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2024 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar Belakang: Laboratorium pendidikan merupakan salah satu sistem penunjang akademik dan memiliki peran dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan, khususnya di perguruan tinggi. Kegiatan di laboratorium pendidikan yang menggunakan bahan biologi dan kimia berpotensi menimbulkan infeksi dan kontaminasi terhadap pekerja laboratorium dan lingkungan sekitarnya. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis standar operasional penggunaan bahan biologi dan kimia berbahaya serta praktik keselamatan kerja di laboratorium pendidikan di Universitas Jember.

Metode: jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif observasional. Lokasi penelitian yang diamati adalah sembilan laboratorium pendidikan. Variabel yang diamati dalam penelitian ini adalah SOP penggunaan bahan biologi (7 komponen) dan SOP penggunaan bahan kimia berbahaya (8 komponen).

Hasil: Hasil observasi dan analisis menunjukkan bahwa laboratorium mikrobiologi, laboratorium biologi molekuler dan bioteknologi, laboratorium kedokteran molekuler, dan laboratorium biomaterial dan rekayasa bioproses memiliki standar yang baik dalam penggunaan bahan biologi (menerapkan 6 dari 7 komponen). Sementara itu, standar penggunaan bahan kimia berbahaya di laboratorium biologi molekuler dan bioteknologi dan laboratorium molekuler cukup baik (menerapkan 6 dari 8 komponen).

Simpulan: berdasarkan komponen standar di laboratorium pendidikan tersebut, setidaknya ada dua standar yang sudah diterapkan, yaitu mencuci tangan menggunakan Alat Pelindung Diri (APD) saat bekerja dengan bahan berbahaya di laboratorium.

 

ABSTRACT

Background: Educational laboratories are an academic supporting system and have a role in improving educational quality, especially in tertiary institutions. Activities in educational laboratories that use biological and chemical materials can potentially cause infection and contamination of laboratory workers and the surrounding environment. Thus, this research aims to identify and analyze operational standards for the use of hazardous biological and chemical substances and work safety practices in educational laboratories at the University of Jember.

Methods: This type of research is descriptive observational. The research locations were in nine educational laboratories. The variables observed in this study were SOPs using hazardous biological materials (7 components) and SOPs using chemicals (8 components).

Result: The observation and analysis results showed that the Laboratory of Microbiology, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, and Laboratory of Biomaterials and Bioprocess Engineering had good standards for using hazardous biological materials (applying 6 out of 7 components). Meanwhile, standards for using chemicals in the Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology and the Laboratory of Molecular Medicine were also quite good (applying 6 out of 8 components).

Conclusions: Based on these standard components in the educational laboratory, at least two standards have been implemented, such as washing hands and using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while working on hazardous substances in the laboratory.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Lembar Observasi Studi Pendahuluan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Laboratorium Pendidikan Universitas Jember
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (1MB)    Indexing metadata
 CoP
Certificate of Proofreading
Subject
Type CoP
  Download (140KB)    Indexing metadata
 Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
 CTA
Copyrigh Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (202KB)    Indexing metadata
 ES
Etichal Statement
Subject
Type ES
  Download (223KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Educational Laboratory; hazardous substances; Standard Operational Procedure

Article Metrics:

  1. Reid N, Shah I. The Role of Laboratory Work in University Chemistry. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2007;8(2):172–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C
  2. Wei C. Research on University Laboratory Management and Maintenance Framework Based on Computer Aided Technology. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2020 Dec;8:103617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103617
  3. Ali N, Ullah S, Khan D. Interactive Laboratories for Science Education: A Subjective Study and Systematic Literature Review. MTI. 2022 Sep 21;6(10):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6100085
  4. Kertiasih NLP. Peranan Laboratorium Pendidikan untuk Menunjang Proses Perkuliahan Jurusan Keperawatan Gigi Poltekkes Denpasar. Jurnal Kesehatan Gigi. 2016 Aug;4(2):59–66
  5. Kartikasari SN. Peran Laboratorium sebagai Pusat Riset untuk Meningkatkan Mutu dari Lembaga Pendidikan pada Jurusan THP_FTP_UNEJ. Temapela: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Pengelolaan Laboratorium. 2019 May;2(1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.25077/temapela.2.1.17-27.2019
  6. Lestari F, Bowolaksono A, Yuniautami S, Wulandari TR, Andani S. Evaluation of the Implementation of Occupational Health, Safety, and Environment Management Systems in Higher Education Laboratories. J Chem Health Saf. 2019 Jul 1;26(4–5):14–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2018.12.006
  7. Bowolaksono A, Lestari F, Satyawardhani SA, Kadir A, Maharani CF, Paramitasari D. Analysis of Bio-Risk Management System Implementation in Indonesian Higher Education Laboratory. IJERPH. 2021 May 11;18(10):5076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105076
  8. Schröder I, Huang DYQ, Ellis O, Gibson JH, Wayne NL. Laboratory Safety Attitudes and Practices: A Comparison of Academic, Government, and Industry Researchers. J Chem Health Saf. 2016 Jan 1;23(1):12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2015.03.001
  9. Gatae FF, Jasim AK, Hassanalibraheem SA. Safety Assessment in Chemical and Biological Laboratories at Basra University, Iraq. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2020;20(2):3565–8
  10. Johnston JD, Thygerson SM, Johnson MJ, Reading JC. Hand Washing Quality among Biosafety Level 2 Research Laboratory Workers. Appl Biosaf. 2013 Sep;18(3):116–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/153567601301800303
  11. Lestari F, Kadir A, Miswary T, Maharani CF, Bowolakso0 A, Paramitasari D. Implementation of Bio-Risk Management System in a National Clinical and Medical Referral Centre Laboratories. IJERPH. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052308
  12. Azadeh A, Rouzbahman M, Saberi M, Mohammad Fam I. An Adaptive Neural Network Algorithm for Assessment and Improvement of Job Satisfaction with Respect to HSE and Ergo0mics Program: The Case of A gas Refinery. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2011 Jul;24(4):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.01.015
  13. Miles MB, Huberman AM. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publication, Inc.; 1994. 338 p
  14. Rakhman AJ, Nasri SM. Biosafety Level di Laboratorium Mikrobiologi PT SCI. PREPOTIF: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2021 Okt;5(2):522–35. https://doi.org/10.31004/prepotif.v5i2.1747
  15. Jiang M, Liu B, Wei Q. Pathogenic Microorganism Biobanking in China. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. 2019 Mar;1(1):31–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2018.12.013
  16. Kareem SM, Hamzah IH, Bahiya HT. Improve Biosafety Level in Advance Molecular Laboratory at College of Science. Iraqi National Journal of Chemistry. 2016;16(2):89–95
  17. Liu S. Combustion, Reactive Hazard, and Bioprocess Safety. In: Bioprocess Engineering [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017 [cited 2023 Jul 4]. p. 1059–128. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780444637833000186.
  18. Fuls JL, Rodgers ND, Fischler GE, Howard JM, Patel M, Weidner PL, et al. Alternative Hand Contamination Technique to Compare the Activities of Antimicrobial and 0nantimicrobial Soaps under Different Test Conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun 15;74(12):3739–44. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02405-07
  19. Gibson JH, Schröder I, Wayne NL. A Research University’s Rapid Response to A Fatal Chemistry Accident: Safety Changes and Outcomes. J Chem Health Saf. 2014 Jul 1;21(4):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchas.2014.01.003
  20. Si H, Ji H, Zeng X. Quantitative Risk Assessment Model of Hazardous Chemicals Leakage and Application. Safety Science. 2012 Aug;50(7):1452–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.011
  21. Rezaee MJ, Yousefi S, Eshkevari M, Valipour M, Saberi M. Risk Analysis of Health, Safety and Environment in Chemical Industry Integrating Linguistic FMEA, Fuzzy Inference System and Fuzzy DEA. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2020 Jan;34(1):201–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01754-3
  22. Nishikimi T, Tomita K, Hayashi R, Shizuaki M. Injury Risk Estimation for Students Involved in Experimental Work in Nagoya University. Journal of Environment and Safety. 2019;10(1):1–7
  23. Ménard AD, Trant JF. A Review and Critique of Academic Lab Safety Research. Nat Chem. 2020 Jan;12(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x
  24. National Research Council. Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and Management of Chemical Hazards. Washington DC: Academies Press; 2011. 360 p
  25. American Chemical Society Joint Board–Council Committee on Chemical Safety. Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories. 8th ed. Washington DC: American Chemical Society; 2017
  26. Ruekberg B. Hand Washing Warning. J Chem Educ. 2011 Feb 1;88(2):239–239. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100447n
  27. Mohd Nawi NS, Ting HY, Sukadarin EH. Risk Among Cleaners: The Usage of Personal Protective Equipment. JISTM. 2020 Jun 10;5(17):01–11. https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.517001
  28. DellaValle CT, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Andreotti G, Alavanja MCR. Risk-Accepting Personality and Personal Protective Equipment Use Within the Agricultural Health Study. Journal of Agromedicine. 2012 Jul;17(3):264–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2012.686390
  29. Chandra T, Zebrowski JP, Lenertz LY. Safe Handling of Cannulas and Needles in Chemistry Laboratories. American Chemical Society: Chemical Health & Safety. 2022 Jan 5;29(2):175–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.1c00069
  30. Al-Jboory HLH, Al-Khalaf AKH. Training Programs for Students on Chemical Safety and Security: Al-Qasim Green University as A Case Study. Iraqi National Journal of Chemistry. 2017;17(3):178–83
  31. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja di Perkantoran. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2016
  32. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar dan Persyaratan Lingkungan Kerja Industri. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2016

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 16:18:33

No citation recorded.