DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpki.16.2.56-63

Hubungan Safety Promotion dengan Perilaku Aman pada Pekerja Konstruksi Proyek Pembangunan

*Yakub Andriyadi  -  Public Health Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
Dina Lusiana Setyowati  -  Public Health Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
Riza Hayati Ifroh  -  Public Health Faculty, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Authors under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: As much as 88% of work accidents are caused by unsafe behavior. Encouraging a safety culture through a behavior-based safety approach could prevent work accidents. PT X's Mulawarman University building construction project reporting from June 2018 to November 2019, there were 13 accidents. It is crucial to encourage a behavior-based safety approach by promoting occupational safety and health to prevent accidents in the workplace. The research objective was to determine the relationship between safety promotion consisting of safety talk, K3 training, supervision with safe behavior in PT X construction workers, and the Mulawarman University building construction. Method: This study used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional method. The population of this study was all employees of PT X, with a sample of 138 workers using probability sampling techniques with a proportionate stratified random sampling method. The data source obtained from a questionnaire that previously tested the validity with a value> 0.361 and reliability with a value of safe behavior (0.892), safety talk (0.920), training (0.920), and supervision (0.739). Bivariate analysis using Spearman Rank test and multivariate analysis using Binary Logistics Regression test (significant level 0.05). Results: The results of this study indicate that there is a relationship between safety promotion which consists of a safety talk (p-value = 0.001), training (pvalue = 0.009) and supervision (p-value = 0.001) with safe behavior in PT X building construction workers. The variable that has the level of influence on the safe behavior of workers is the supervision variable. Therefore, efforts to improve by having a commitment through safety promotion activities and involving workers in implementing safety in the company environment are critical.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: safety promotion;safety talk;supervision;safe behaviour
Funding: -

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Instruments to Measure Health Literacy among Children: A Scoping Review Hubungan Safety Promotion dengan Perilaku Aman pada Pekerja Konstruksi Proyek Pembangunan Hubungan Pengetahuan dan Sikap terhadap Praktik Pencegahan COVID-19 pada Narapidana More recent articles
Most cited articles
Faktor Risiko Kejadian Low Back Pain Pada Operator Tambang Sebuah Perusahaan Tambang Nickel Di Sulawesi Selatan Faktor Risiko Low Back Pain pada Pekerja Pemetik Teh di Perkebunan Teh Ciater Kabupaten Subang Pengaruh Perilaku Menggosok Gigi terhadap Plak Gigi Pada Siswa Kelas IV dan V di SDN Wilayah Kecamatan Gajahmungkur Semarang Praktik Inisiasi Menyusu Dini Niat Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (TKI) di Jawa Tengah Dalam Upaya Mencegah Tertular HIV dan AIDS More cited articles
  1. Pratiwi A, Sukmandari A, Rakhmadi T. Hubungan Pengalaman Kerja, Pengetahuan K3, Sikap K3 Terhadap Perilaku Tidak Aman Pada Pekerja Konstruksi di Institusi X Kabupaten Tegal. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;10(2):1689–99
  2. Awwad R, Souki O E, Jabbour M. Construction safety practices and challenges in a middle eastern developing country. Saf.sci [Internet]. 2016; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925753515002775
  3. Larisca N, Widjasena B, Kuriawan B. Hubungan Iklim Keselamatan Kerja Dengan Tindakan Tidak Aman Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung X Semarang. J Kesehat Masy [Internet]. 2019;7(4)
  4. ILO. Safety and Healt At The Hearts Of The Future Of Work: Building On 100Years Of Experience [Internet]. International Labor Organization. 2019. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_686645.pdf
  5. Susanti B, & Said A. Alokasi Biaya Penyelenggaraan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Pada Proyek Konstruksi Jembatan Di Kota Palembang. In: Avoer XI [Internet]. Palembang: Prosiding AVoER 11; 2019. p. 23–4. Available from: http://ejournal.ft.unsri.ac.id/index.php/AVoer/article/view/352
  6. Aksorn T & Hadikusumo. The Unsafe Acts and the Decision-to-Err Factors of Thai Construction Workers. J Constr Dev Ctries [Internet]. 2007;12(1):1–25. Available from: http://www.hbp.usm.my/JCDC/input/JCDC Vol 12(1)/1_Thanet & Hadikusumo_.2doc.pdf
  7. Holt, St. J.A. Principle of construction safety. London: Blackweell Science; 2001
  8. Yuliani M, Wahyuni I,& Ekawati E. Hubungan Antara Pengetahuan , Penerapan Prosedur Kerja , Punishment Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Safety Behavior Pada Pekerja Konstruksi. jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2021;9:58–64
  9. Geller E Scott. The Psychology of Safety Handbook. United States: Lewis Publisher; 2001. 25–31 p
  10. Sipayung RT, Lubis HS, Syahri IM. Hubungan promosi keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (k3) dengan perilaku aman (safety behaviors) pada karyawanan bagian produksi pengelolaan minyak sawit di PTPN IV Kebon Dolok Ilir [Internet]. Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2015. Available from: http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/46930
  11. Cooper D. Improving Safety Culture: A Practical Guide. Jhon Wiley Sons Ltd. London: Applied Behavioural Sciences; 2001
  12. Pinem M M. Penerapan Safety Talk Dan Kejadian Kecelakaan Kerja PT. Waskita Karya Pekanbaru Tahun 2015 [Internet]. Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2016. Available from: http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/55935
  13. Sari N A. Efektivitas Komunikasi Safety Talk Sebagai Pemenuhan Informasi K3 Bagi Karyawan PT.Multikon. Universitas Mercu Buana; 2011. Available from: https://repository.mercubuana.ac.id/19182/
  14. Gumelar F, Ardyanto F. Hubungan Kepatuhan Dan Pengetahuan Tentang Apd Dengan Safety Talk Di Unit Maintenance PT. Holcim Indonesia Tbk. JPH Recode. 2018;1(2):61–9
  15. Anggraeni M D. Perbedaan Nilai Sebelum dan Sesudah Program Weekly Safety Talk Pada Pekerja diPT Bumi Suksesindo Banyuwangi. Maj Kesehat Masy Aceh [Internet]. 2019;2(3):69–76. Available from: http://ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/index.php/MaKMA/article/view/69-76
  16. Heni Y. Improving Our Safety Culture. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2011
  17. Delfianda. Survey Faktor Tindakan Tidak Aman Pekerja Konstruksi PT. Waskita Karya Proyek World Class University di UI Depok Tahun 2011 [Internet]. Universitas Indonesia; 2012. Available from: http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20289294-S-Delfianda.pdf
  18. Setiarsih Y, Setyaningsih Y, Widjasena B. Hubungan karakteristik pekerja, promosi K3, dan ketersediaan alat pelindung diri (APD) dengan perilaku tidak aman pada pekerja mechanical maintenance. J Kesehat Masy. 2017;5(5):424–33
  19. Muhammad MS. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Tidak Aman Pada Pekerja Konstruksi PT Indopora Poyek East 8 Cibubur Jakarta Timur. J Ilm Kesehat. 2018;10(September):173–80
  20. Jamirin R. Faktor faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaku tidak aman pekerja konstruksi bagian Finishing Proyek Pembangunan Hotel Midtown Samarinda. Universitas Mulawarman; 2016
  21. Ramdan Iwan M & Wijayanti Dyyka. Unsafe Behavior of Workers in Rotary Lathe Section in One of the Plywood Industries in East Kalimantan Satu Industri Kayu Lapis di Kalimantan Timur. 2018;13(1):30–5
  22. Sangaji J, Jayanti S, Lestantyo D. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Tidak Aman Pekerja Bagian Lambung Galangan Kapal Pt X. J Kesehat Masy Univ Diponegoro [Internet]. 2018;6:563–71. Available from: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkm/article/view/22095
  23. Halimah S. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi perilak Aman Karyawanan di PT SIM Plant Tambunan II [Internet]. Uin Syarif Hidayatullah; 2012. Available from: http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/627
  24. Anshari Lutfil Hadi. Faktor Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Dengan Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Pekerja Bagian Produksi PT.Kunango Jantan Kab. Padang Pariaman Tahun 2020 [Internet]. Andalas University; 2021
  25. Rapina & Friska H. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi dan Tindakan Supervisi Terhadap Kepuasaan Kerja Auditor Junior Survei pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) di Kota Bandung. J Ilm Akunt. 2011
  26. Handoko Dwi. Analisis Pengaruh Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Pada Pekerja Bangunan Gedung Penataan Ruang Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum [Internet]. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November; 2015. Available from: repository.its.ac.id/1586/

Last update:

  1. THE EFFECT OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY (OHS) MANAGEMENT ON SAFETY BEHAVIOR OF WORKERS AT CONSTRUCTION SERVICE COMPANY IN SURABAYA

    Lailatul Badriyah, Noeroel Widajati , Dani Nasirul Haqi , Meirina Ernawati . Journal of Vocational Health Studies, 6 (2), 2022. doi: 10.20473/jvhs.V6.I2.2022.134-141

  2. The Influence of Safety Communications and Safety Promotion Policies on Safety Performance among Nurses in The Emergency Department at a Tertiary Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia

    Ratih Berliana, Noeroel Widajati, Nurhayati Saridewi, Endang Dwiyanti. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 58 (4), 2022. doi: 10.20473/fmi.v58i4.35246

Last update: 2025-12-04 15:07:38

No citation recorded.