BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JSCL19624, author = {Hidayat Hidayat and Erond Damanik}, title = {Batak dan Bukan Batak: Paradigma Sosiohistoris tentang Konstruksi Identitas Etnik di Kota Medan, 1906-1939}, journal = {Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, year = {2018}, keywords = {Batak; Social Construction; Urban Identity; Plural Society.}, abstract = { This research discusses the sociohistorical paradigm of Batak label construction on Mandailing and Angkola ethnicities in the city of Medan, 1906-1939. Throughout the year, the two ethnic migrants from southern Tapanuli clashed in Medan because of the Batak labeling. The Mandailing ethnic group rejected the Batak label, while the Angkola ethnic group affirmed on that label. The disputes have an impact on the division of political, economic, religious and cultural identities. The rejection from Mandailing ethnic on Batak labeling continues to occur until 2017. This research aims to describe the construction of the Batak label by answering general questions on how do the two ethnic groups fight because of the Batak label? Specifically, this article also answers the origin of Batak labeling? Why is the label debated? To explain this case, the theory of social construction is used with the sociohistorical paradigm and the case study research method. The results of the study that the Batak label is considered as a foreign ethnographic construction with a pejorative tone and disputes occur because of the strategic stability of identity as a social radar to understand the social world. }, issn = {2443-0110}, pages = {71--87} doi = {10.14710/jscl.v3i2.19624}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jscl/article/view/19624} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This research discusses the sociohistorical paradigm of Batak label construction on Mandailing and Angkola ethnicities in the city of Medan, 1906-1939. Throughout the year, the two ethnic migrants from southern Tapanuli clashed in Medan because of the Batak labeling. The Mandailing ethnic group rejected the Batak label, while the Angkola ethnic group affirmed on that label. The disputes have an impact on the division of political, economic, religious and cultural identities. The rejection from Mandailing ethnic on Batak labeling continues to occur until 2017. This research aims to describe the construction of the Batak label by answering general questions on how do the two ethnic groups fight because of the Batak label? Specifically, this article also answers the origin of Batak labeling? Why is the label debated? To explain this case, the theory of social construction is used with the sociohistorical paradigm and the case study research method. The results of the study that the Batak label is considered as a foreign ethnographic construction with a pejorative tone and disputes occur because of the strategic stability of identity as a social radar to understand the social world.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Reaching out and institutionalizing multiple kinship relationships in the social environment: Ampangnaopat among Simalungunese, Indonesia
Identity-Based Administrative Involution in Indonesia: How Political Actors and Community Figures Do It?
Reaching out and institutionalizing multiple kinship relationships in the social environment:Ampangnaopatamong Simalungunese, Indonesia
Alignment: Conflict Resolution through Sulang-Silima among Pakpaknese, Indonesia
Last update: 2026-01-04 22:52:25
Authors whose articles are published in Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha (JSCL) retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting a manuscript to JSCL, the author(s) agree to this policy. No separate documentation is required.The author(s) guarantee that:
The work is subject to copyright held by the author(s), is free of third-party rights, and all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained.The author(s) retain the following rights to the published work, including but not limited to:
If the article is co-authored, the submitting author confirms that all co-authors have agreed to the copyright and licensing terms and have been informed of this policy. JSCL is not responsible for any internal disputes between authors. All communication will be directed solely to the corresponding author.Authors should also be aware that once published, their articles, and any accompanying files, such as datasets or analytical/computational materials, will be publicly accessible. These materials will be governed by the same Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.JSCL allows users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under this license. Users must credit the author(s) and JSCL when distributing the work through journals or other publication media. Unless otherwise specified, the author(s) are considered public entities upon publication of the article.
Published by Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro UniversityJl. Prof. Soedarto, S.H. Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 56025Phone: +6224-74680619; Fax: +6224-74680619Email: jscl@live.undip.ac.id View statistics