DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jscl.v6i2.37714

Industri Pertahanan Prancis dan Inggris Dalam Penguatan Aliansi Kekuatan Militer pada Perang Dunia I

*Dwi Soediantono  -  Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Pertahanan, Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
Amarulla Octavian  -  Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Pertahanan, Universitas Pertahanan,, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

World War I took place on the European continent between the Allies and the Central powers. In this war, the warring parties did not only rely on the troops quantity, but also their own technology. In addition, both sides had maximally empowered their strategic industries in building military forces for war. The article identifies the factors that supported the victory of France and Britain in World War I, thus encouraging the development of war technology and strategic industry which continues to present day. In that arena, France and Britain had the upper hand in the use of technology and industrial support for war. The theories used for this discussion are Carl von Clausewitz's theory of war, Morgenthau's balance of power theory, Liddell Hart's strategy theory and the theory of revolution in military affairs. The discussion was carried out using qualitative methods with an exploratory and historical approach which ultimately showed that the Allied defense industry had so far gained technological advantage from the influence of the victory in World War I.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: World War I; Military Technology; Strategic Industry

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Para Saudagar Batik dan Pengembangan Muhammadiyah Cabang Garut, 1919-1940 Eksplorasi Sejarah Sungai Bengawan Solo sebagai Salah Satu Materi Pembelajaran Sejarah Lokal di Sekolah Menengah Atas Tarekat dan Modal Sosial dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nahdlatul Wathan, 1966-1997 More recent articles
Most cited articles
Dominasi Orang-Orang Besar Dalam Sejarah Indonesia: Kritik Politik Historiografi dan Politik Ingatan Batak dan Bukan Batak: Paradigma Sosiohistoris tentang Konstruksi Identitas Etnik di Kota Medan, 1906-1939 Peranan Perguruan Tinggi di Semarang dalam Pelestarian Wayang Orang Ngesti Pandowo Peranan Pemerintah dalam Pengembangan Wayang Orang Panggung Editorial More cited articles
  1. Clausewitz, Carl von. 1984. On war. New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Encylopedia Britannica. 2010. “World War I 1914 1918.” Diperbarui pada 8 Desember 2021 www.britannica.com/event/World-War-I
  3. Fromkin. D. 2007. Europe's Last Summer: Who Started the Great War in 1914. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  4. Gray. Colin.S. 2006. “Strategy and History” Essays on Theory and Practice. First Edition. London. Routledge
  5. Keegan, J. 1989. The First World War. Sydney: Hutchinson
  6. Kuntowijoyo. 1995. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya
  7. Levy, J. S. 2004. “What Do Great Powers Balance Against and When.” In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, eds. by T. V. Paul, James J. Wirtz, and Michel Fortmann. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
  8. Mahan, A. T. 1980. The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660-1783. Boston: Little, Brown, and company
  9. Maloney, Sean M., and Scot Robertson. 1999. “The Revolution in Military Affairs: Possible Implications for Canada.” International Journal 54(3): 443–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203405
  10. Marshall, A. W. (1966). Problems of Estimating Military Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  11. Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace
  12. Mosier, J. 2001. "Germany and the Development of Combined Arms Tactics.” In The Myth of the Great War: How the Germans Won the Battles and How the Americans Saved the Allies, edited by M. Yockelson. New York: Harper Collins
  13. Murray, W. 1997. “Thinking about the revolution in Military Affairs.” https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA354177.pdf
  14. Nironen, E. 1995. Corporate Strategy and Culture in a Conversion Process: Adjustment in defence industry. “International journal of production economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00049-6
  15. Price, A. 1980. Aircraft versus Submarine: The Evolution of the Anti-submarine Aircraft, 1912 to 1980. London: Jane’s Publishing
  16. Prior, R. 1999. The First World War. London: Cassell
  17. Searle, Alaric. 1998. “A Very Special Relationship: Basil Liddell Hart, Wehrmacht Generals and the Debate on West German Rearmament, 1945–1953.” War in History 5(3): 327–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26007299
  18. Sjamsuddin & Ismaun. 1996. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Proyek Penelitian Tenaga Akademik
  19. Sjamsuddin, H. 2007. Metodologi Sejarah. Jakarta: Ombak
  20. Treadwell, Terry C. 2006. Cambrai, The First Tank Battle. London: Cerberus Publishing
  21. Willmott, H. P. 2001. World War I. New York: Dorling Kindersley

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-23 09:05:15

No citation recorded.