skip to main content

Politik Agraria Kolonial dan Perlawanan Sosial di Jawa Timur: Legenda Sarip Tambak Oso

*Muhdi Muhdi orcid scopus publons  -  Program Studi Sejarah Peradaban Islam, Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Jl. Dr. Ir. Soekarno No. 682 Gunung Anyar Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60294, Indonesia
Eva Nur Rachmawati  -  Program Studi Sejarah Peradaban Islam, Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Jl. Dr. Ir. Soekarno No. 682 Gunung Anyar Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 60294, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This article examines colonial agrarian politics in Eastern Java following the enactment of the Agrarische Wet of 1870, focusing on the effects of land taxation policies on rural social inequality and on the interpretation of Sarip Tambak Oso’s actions as a form of popular social resistance to the colonial agrarian order. Employing the historical method within a historical, sociological approach, through heuristic, verification, interpretation, and historiographical stages, the analysis is grounded in Ralph Linton’s role theory and James C. Scott’s theory of everyday resistance. The study advances three principal findings. First, post-1870 colonial agrarian policy in Java did not constitute a liberating form of agrarian liberalism; rather, it established a hierarchical and exploitative land-tenure regime through the doctrine of domein verklaring. Second, colonial land taxation functioned as a mechanism of power that reproduced rural social stratification, intensified economic inequality, and accelerated the proletarianization of smallholders. Third, within this structurally unequal agrarian context, Sarip Tambak Oso, popularly remembered as a “thief for the people”, can be understood as embodying a form of moral-economic social resistance that challenged colonial hegemony through symbolic and redistributive action. Sarip represents subaltern agency, underscoring that colonial conflict in Java was fundamentally rooted in struggles over land, taxation, and rural social justice. Theoretically, this article argues that colonial agrarian policy produced structural domination, while Sarip Tambak Oso’s resistance expands the analytical scope of everyday resistance and role theory as forms of subaltern political praxis.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Colonial Agrarian Politics; Land Taxation; Social Inequality; Social Resistance; Sarip Tambak Oso; Eastern Java
Funding: -

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdurrahman, Dudung. 2011. Metode Penelitian Sejarah Islam. Yogyakarta: Ombak
  2. Anderson, Benedict. 1990. Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
  3. Andreas, Ricco, Luthfi Kalbu Adi, dan Sri Sulastuti. 2019. “The Effect of Colonialism on Implementation of Agrarian Reform in Indonesia.” FIAT JUSTISIA 13 (2): 101–114. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no2.1565
  4. Bayu Wibisono, Aryo. 2024. Sarip Tambak Oso: Dekonstruksi Cerita Sarip Tambak Oso melalui Fotografi dan Tipografi. Disertasi Pascasarjana, Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta
  5. Chijs, J. A. van der. 1890. “Bijdragen tot de Geschiedenis van het Inlandsch Onderwijhs in Nederlandsch-Indië.” 385–407
  6. Dobbin, Christine. 1983. Islamic Revivalism in a Changing Peasant Economy: Central Sumatra, 1784–1847. London: Curzon Press
  7. Galudra, G., dan M. Sirait. 2009. “A Discourse on Dutch Colonial Forest Policy and Science in Indonesia at the Beginning of the 20th Century.” International Forestry Review 11 (4)
  8. Herusatoto, Budiono. 1984. Simbolisme dalam Budaya Jawa. Yogyakarta: Hanindita
  9. Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1966. The Peasants’ Revolt in Banten in 1888: Its Conditions, Course and Sequel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
  10. Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1984. Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya
  11. Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1999. Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu
  12. Kurniawan, Hendra. 2014. “Dampak Sistem Tanam Paksa terhadap Dinamika Perekonomian Petani Jawa 1830–1870.” Jurnal Socia 11 (2): 163–172
  13. https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v11i2.5301
  14. Wardhani, Jihan Kusuma. 2019. “Dramaturgi Ludruk Karya Budaya Mojokerto Jawa Timur Lakon Sarip Tambak Oso.” SATWIKA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial 3 (1):27-42
  15. https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v3i1.8680
  16. Mashuri, dan Naila N. 2008. Peran Ibu dalam Cerita Sarip Tambak Oso. Sidoarjo: Balai Bahasa Surabaya
  17. Moll, J. P. A. C. van. 1905. De Onlusten in Sidhoardjo (Mei 1904). Archief Java Suiker Industrie
  18. Mustaqiem. 2014. Perpajakan dalam Konteks Teori dan Hukum Perpajakan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Buku Litera
  19. Nabil Athoillah, Muchammad. 2024. “Nasionalisme Tambak Oso dalam Perspektif Sejarah.” Dalam Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Mahasiswa Sejarah Peradaban Islam (KONMASPI), vol. 1
  20. Novita, Esther. 2023. “Hukum Politik Agraria.” Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 3 (2): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v3i02.679
  21. Onghokham. 2002. Runtuhnya Tradisi: Esei-esei Sejarah Sosial. Disunting oleh Harsya W. Bachtiar. Jakarta: LP3ES
  22. Reid, Anthony. 2003. “War, Peace and the Burden of History in Aceh.” Asian Studies Review 27 (3): 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463136042000259761
  23. Ricklefs, M. C. 2008. A History of Modern Indonesia since c.1200. Edisi ke-4. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
  24. Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
  25. Shiraishi, Takashi. 1990. An Age in Motion: Popular Radicalism in Java, 1912–1926. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
  26. Shomad, Masyrullahus, dan Sudrajat. 2019. “Penerapan Agrarische Wet (Undang-Undang Agraria) 1870.” HISTORIA 7 (2): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.24127/hj.v7i2.2045
  27. Stoler, Ann Laura. 1985. Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra’s Plantation Belt, 1870–1979. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
  28. Susilo, Joko, dan Niko Fediyanto. 2018. “Pembangunan Karakter Kearifan Legenda Sarip Tambak Oso bagi Generasi.” Jurnal Abadimas Adi Buana 2 (1): 21-27
  29. https://doi.org/10.36456/abadimas.v2.i1.a1618
  30. Taylor, Jean Gelman. 2003. Indonesia: Peoples and Histories. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
  31. Tim Penelusur Sejarah Sidoarjo. 2006. Jejak Sidoarjo: Dari Jenggala ke Suriname. Sidoarjo: Ikatan Alumni Pamong Praja Sidoarjo
  32. van Deventer, C. Th. 1866. Bijdragen tot de Kennis van het Landelijk Stelsel op Java. Vol. 2. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff
  33. van der Kroef, Justus M. 1951. “Indonesia and the Origins of Dutch Colonial Sovereignty.” The Far Eastern Quarterly 10 (2): 151-169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2049094
  34. Wahid, Abdul. 2021. Politik Perpajakan Kolonial di Indonesia: Antara Eksploitasi dan Resistansi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
  35. Widodo, Dukut Imam, dan Henri Nurcahyo. 2013. Sidoardjo Tempo Doeloe. Surabaya: Dukut Publishing
  36. Wardani, Widyarini Indriasti. 2018. “Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah dalam Kerangka Politik Hukum Agraria Nasional.” Jurnal Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat 15 (2): 147–156

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.