BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JSCL76396, author = {Muhdi Muhdi and Eva Rachmawati}, title = {Politik Agraria Kolonial dan Perlawanan Sosial di Jawa Timur: Legenda Sarip Tambak Oso}, journal = {Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Colonial Agrarian Politics; Land Taxation; Social Inequality; Social Resistance; Sarip Tambak Oso; Eastern Java}, abstract = { This article examines colonial agrarian politics in Eastern Java following the enactment of the Agrarische Wet of 1870, focusing on the effects of land taxation policies on rural social inequality and on the interpretation of Sarip Tambak Oso’s actions as a form of popular social resistance to the colonial agrarian order. Employing the historical method within a historical, sociological approach, through heuristic, verification, interpretation, and historiographical stages, the analysis is grounded in Ralph Linton’s role theory and James C. Scott’s theory of everyday resistance. The study advances three principal findings. First, post-1870 colonial agrarian policy in Java did not constitute a liberating form of agrarian liberalism; rather, it established a hierarchical and exploitative land-tenure regime through the doctrine of domein verklaring . Second, colonial land taxation functioned as a mechanism of power that reproduced rural social stratification, intensified economic inequality, and accelerated the proletarianization of smallholders. Third, within this structurally unequal agrarian context, Sarip Tambak Oso, popularly remembered as a “thief for the people”, can be understood as embodying a form of moral-economic social resistance that challenged colonial hegemony through symbolic and redistributive action. Sarip represents subaltern agency, underscoring that colonial conflict in Java was fundamentally rooted in struggles over land, taxation, and rural social justice. Theoretically, this article argues that colonial agrarian policy produced structural domination, while Sarip Tambak Oso’s resistance expands the analytical scope of everyday resistance and role theory as forms of subaltern political praxis. }, issn = {2443-0110}, pages = {173--184} doi = {10.14710/jscl.v10i2.76396}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jscl/article/view/76396} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This article examines colonial agrarian politics in Eastern Java following the enactment of the Agrarische Wet of 1870, focusing on the effects of land taxation policies on rural social inequality and on the interpretation of Sarip Tambak Oso’s actions as a form of popular social resistance to the colonial agrarian order. Employing the historical method within a historical, sociological approach, through heuristic, verification, interpretation, and historiographical stages, the analysis is grounded in Ralph Linton’s role theory and James C. Scott’s theory of everyday resistance. The study advances three principal findings. First, post-1870 colonial agrarian policy in Java did not constitute a liberating form of agrarian liberalism; rather, it established a hierarchical and exploitative land-tenure regime through the doctrine of domein verklaring. Second, colonial land taxation functioned as a mechanism of power that reproduced rural social stratification, intensified economic inequality, and accelerated the proletarianization of smallholders. Third, within this structurally unequal agrarian context, Sarip Tambak Oso, popularly remembered as a “thief for the people”, can be understood as embodying a form of moral-economic social resistance that challenged colonial hegemony through symbolic and redistributive action. Sarip represents subaltern agency, underscoring that colonial conflict in Java was fundamentally rooted in struggles over land, taxation, and rural social justice. Theoretically, this article argues that colonial agrarian policy produced structural domination, while Sarip Tambak Oso’s resistance expands the analytical scope of everyday resistance and role theory as forms of subaltern political praxis.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Authors whose articles are published in Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha (JSCL) retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting a manuscript to JSCL, the author(s) agree to this policy. No separate documentation is required.The author(s) guarantee that:
The work is subject to copyright held by the author(s), is free of third-party rights, and all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained.The author(s) retain the following rights to the published work, including but not limited to:
If the article is co-authored, the submitting author confirms that all co-authors have agreed to the copyright and licensing terms and have been informed of this policy. JSCL is not responsible for any internal disputes between authors. All communication will be directed solely to the corresponding author.Authors should also be aware that once published, their articles, and any accompanying files, such as datasets or analytical/computational materials, will be publicly accessible. These materials will be governed by the same Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.JSCL allows users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under this license. Users must credit the author(s) and JSCL when distributing the work through journals or other publication media. Unless otherwise specified, the author(s) are considered public entities upon publication of the article.
Published by Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro UniversityJl. Prof. Soedarto, S.H. Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 56025Phone: +6224-74680619; Fax: +6224-74680619Email: jscl@live.undip.ac.id View statistics