DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i1.37550

Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case

*Khrisna Lintang Satrio Nugroho  -  Master of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Trial of criminal law cases is highly important to prove misconduct in a case. In respect to the evidence of corruption criminal act, an insider is needed as a perpetrator of the offence who works with the investigators, or usually called justice collaborator. The main focus of this study is to examine criminal law policy on the concept of justice collaborator in corruption criminal act and how the legal punishment is for justice collaborators in corruption criminal act. This study is a descriptive research using juridical normative approach. Data used in this study were secondary data. Case study approach was applied in this study. This means that the researcher makes a comparison of cases on the implementation of justice collaborator which is based on a study of a verdict.  According to the result of the research, it is indicated that up to now there has not been conformity in terms of legal regulations or interpretation of the concept of Whistle blower and Justice Collaborator. There has not been mutual understanding in terms of the conviction of the perpetrator who is willing to work with the investigators to uncover a corruption criminal act. This leads to disparity in the making of verdict for the offender.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Criminal Law Policy; Justice Collaborator; Corruption Crime

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case The Urgency of Criminal Code Bill Ratification in Criminal Law Policy Frame on The Spreading of Pornographic Content Offence Sharia Compliance in Micro Waqf Bank Business Activities: A Study of Protection of Consumer’s Spiritual Rights Environmental Law, Populism, and Welfare State: Discourse on Environmental Law in the 21st Century Reconceptualization of The Competence to be held Responsible in National Criminal Code Exception of Mediation Procedure in Bankruptcy Cases According to Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 More recent articles
Most cited articles
KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PENDIDIKAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE More cited articles
  1. Ariyanti, Dwi Oktafia., & Ariyani, Nita. (2020). Model Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 27,(No.2), pp. 328-344
  2. Argandona, A. (2007). The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and its Impact on International Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.74, (No.481), p.1
  3. Lewis, David B., & Carr, Indira. (2010). Combating Corruption Through Employment Law and Whistleblower Protection. Industrial Law Journal, Vol.39, (No.1), pp. 52-81
  4. Coloay. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborrator Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Menurut UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban. Lex Crimen Vol.7, (No.1), pp. 5-12
  5. Derek, B. (2017). Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Justice Collaborator Menurut Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Lex et Societas, Vol.5, (No.5), pp.110-118
  6. Evangelista, Beverly., & Utary, Baiq Ishariaty Wika. (2019). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Solid Journal, Vol.9, (No.2), pp.187-198
  7. Hartnett, Stephen J., Dodge, Patrick Shaou-Whea., & Keränen, Lisa B. (2020). Postcolonial remembering in Taiwan: 228 and transitional justice as “The end of fear. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, Vol.13,(No.3), pp.238-256
  8. Harrison, E. (2007). Corruption. Development in Practice, Vol.17, (No.4-5), pp. 672-678
  9. Ifrani. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Al’Adl, Vol.9, (No.3), p.323
  10. Jain, Arvind K. (2008). Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol.15, (No.1), pp.71-121
  11. Madjid, A. (2020). The supervisory board authority of anti graft commission in wiretapping on criminal acts of coruption. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology ,Vol.29, (No.4), pp. 1754-1758
  12. Mamahit, Coby E. (2016). Kajian Surat Edara Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang Saksi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator). Lex Crimen, Vol.5, (No.6), pp.163-168
  13. Muhammad, R. (2015). Pengaturan dan Urgensi Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, Vol.22, (No.2), pp.203-222
  14. Mulyadi, L. (2014). Menggagas Konsep dan Model Ideal Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime Di Indonesia Masa Mendatang. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol.3, (No.2), pp. 101-116
  15. Melgar, Natalia., Maximo Rossi., & Smith, Tom W. (2010). The Perception of Corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol. 22, (No.1), pp. 120-131
  16. Nixson., Kalo, Syafruddin., Kamello, Tan., & Mulyadi, Mahmud. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. USU Law Journal Vol.1, (No.2), pp.40-56
  17. Palekahelu, Jacob David., Nasution, Krisnadi., & Yudianto, Otto. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal YUSTITIA, Vol.21, (No.1), pp.16-25
  18. Pusparini, Ni Luh Made Dwi., Dewi, A.A. Sagung Laksmi., & Widyantara, I Made Minggu. (2020). Urgensi Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol.1, (No.1), pp. 179-185
  19. Sari, Ratna Kumala., & Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perusahan Teknologi atas Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Oleh Pengemudi Ojek Online. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, Vol.8, (No.1), pp.34-47
  20. Semendawai, Abdul H. (2020). Penetapan Status Justice Collaborator Bagi Tersangka atau Terdakwa Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. PADJAJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.3, (No.3), pp.468-490
  21. Syarif, Daniel Juan M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap (Justice Collaborator) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Privatum, Vol.8, (No.4), pp.152-161
  22. Schneider, J. (2018). Fifty Years of Mafia Corruption and Anti-Mafia Reform. Current Anthropology, Vol.59, (No.S18), pp.16-27
  23. Triplett, Mattew R. (2012). Sexual Assault On College Campuses: Seeking The Appropriate Balance Between Due Process And Victim Protection. Duke Law Journal, Vol.62, (No.2), pp. 487-527
  24. Abidin, A.Z., & Hamzah, Andi. (2010). Pengantar Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Yarsif Watampone
  25. Arief, Barda N. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru), Edisi Pertama, Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
  26. Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Last update:

  1. Implementing of Restorative Justice to Build the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: A Study of the Batak Toba Justice System

    Nur Rochaeti, Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, Ji Hyun Park. LAW REFORM, 19 (2), 2023. doi: 10.14710/lr.v19i2.53184

Last update: 2024-11-21 10:54:47

No citation recorded.