DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41747

Juridical Overview on the Inconsistency of Prohibition to be the Member of Political Parties for the Members of Public Institutions

*Fajar Prima Julian  -  Master of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ratna Herawati  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2021 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The creation of a justice in the life of the nation and state must be supported by regulations that do not conflict with other regulations. The prohibition to join a political party for administrators of public institutions   is in conflict with higher regulations. The article is considered contrary to the principle of "Equality before the Law" when viewed from the aspect of equal concern put forward by Ronald Dworkin. The purpose of this research was to analyze the inconsistency of the prohibition article for members of public institutions   to join political parties and to explain the legal implications for the public institutions when they do not comply with these regulations. The method used was normative juridical with descriptive analytical research specifications, and the type of the data were secondary data. The data analysis was conducted qualitatively. Political rights are part of the human rights owned by a person who should not be limited by discriminatory treatments. In fact, there are still restrictions on these political rights which are detrimental to a person from contributing to become the administrator of a public institution. The contents of conflicting articles cause the public institutions to have a crisis of law compliance, is actually a hierarchical harmony between laws and regulations in Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Inconsistency; Political parties; Public institutions

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Legal Protection for Children Victims of Postpartum Depression Crime Combating Policy of Carding in Indonesia in the Political Perspective of Criminal Law Urgency of Strengthening Women Participation in The Building of Gender Justice Based Village Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law Comparison of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Laws Applied in the United States and Indonesia Securitization of the Merchant Vessels by the Private Contracted Armed Security Personnel: A Legal Perspective More recent articles
Most cited articles
PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE More cited articles
  1. Aedi, Ahmad U. (2013). Rekonstruksi Asas Kesamaan Di Hadapan Hukum (Suatu Kajian Khusus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Perkara 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. Law Reform, Vol.8, (No.3), pp.1-19. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v8i2.12421
  2. Aswandi, Bobi., & Roisah, Kholis.(2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol.1,(No.1),pp.128-145. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145
  3. Azzahra, F. (2020). Pemberlakuan Sanksi Administratif: Bentuk Upaya Paksa Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Pejabat Atas Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Teori Efektivitas Hukum). Binamulia Hukum,Vol.9,(No.2),pp.127-140. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v9i2.122
  4. Bader, V.(2014). Crisis of Political Parties and Representative Democracies: Rethinking Parties In Associational, Experimentalist Governance. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP), Vol.17,(No.3),pp.350–376. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13698230.2 014.886380
  5. Badruzaman, D. (2019). Hak-Hak Politik Warga Negara Non Muslim Sebagai Pemimpin Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum,Vol.9,(No.1),pp.19-38. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v9i1.575
  6. Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von., & Turner, Bertram.(2019). Legal pluralism, social theory, and the state. The Journal Of Legal Pluralism And Unofficial Law, Vol.50,(No.3),pp.255–274
  7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.153264
  8. Chotimah, Chusnul., Widodo, Rohmat., & Handayani, Trisakti.(2019). Efektivitas Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Desa Bululawang. Jurnal Civic Hukum, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.103-113. https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v4i2
  9. Clay, K. Chad., Bakker, Ryan., Brook, Anne-Marie., Jr, Daniel W. Hill., & Murdie, Amanda.(2020). Using Practitioner Surveys To Measure Human Rights: The Human Rights Measurement Initiative's Civil And Political Rights Metrics. Journal Of Peace Research, Vol.57,(No.6), pp.715–727. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00223 43320959688
  10. Feigenson, N.(2014). The Visual in Law: Some Problems for Legal Theory. Law, Culture, And The Humanities, Vol.10,(No.1),pp.13–23. https://doi: 10.1177/1743872111421126
  11. Genest, Gabriel Blouin., & Paquerot, Sylvie.(2016). Environmental Human Rights As A Battlefield: a Grammar of Political Confrontation. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, Vol.7,(No.1),pp.132–154. https://doi.org/10.43 37/jhre.2016.01.06
  12. Hakim, Arya Rahman., & Widodo, Hananto.(2017). Efektivitas Larangan Anggota Partai Politik Untuk Mencalonkan Diri Menjadi Ketua RT/RW Di Kota Surabaya. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.1-13. https://doi.org/10.2674/ novum.v4i2.22744
  13. Idil, Akbar., & Elly, Nurlia.(2018). The Government's Power and Democracy Participation to Eradicating Inequalities in Local. E3S Web of Conference,Vol.73,(No.09010),pp.1-4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187309010
  14. McCrudden, C.(2008). Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. The European Journal Of International Law, Vol.19, (No.4), pp.655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043
  15. Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, Vol.5,(No.1), pp.1-13. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349
  16. Pamuji, Kadar., Nasihuddin, Abdul Aziz., Ardhanariswari, Riris., Supriyanto, & Sukirman.(2018). Pengembangan Model Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa di Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol.24,(No.4),pp.626-643. https://doi.org/10.208 85/iustum.vol24.iss4.art6
  17. Prasetyo, T.(2010). Rule Of Law Dalam Dimensi Negara Hukum Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum, Vol.1,(No.2),pp.129-148. https://doi.org/10.24 246/jrh.2017.v1.i2
  18. Prayitno, S.(2017). Mekanisme Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Dan Akibat Hukumnya Berdasarkan Asas Lex Superiori Derogat Legi Inferiori. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol.8,(No.2),pp.109-120. http://dx.doi.org/10. 32493/jdmhkdmhk.v8i2.698
  19. Putra, I Ketut C. (2017). Relevansi Konsep Negara Hukum Pancasila Dengan Welfare State Dalam Implementasinya Dengan Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, Vol.6,(No.1),pp.1-12. https://doi.org/10.24843/ JMHU.2017.v06.i01.p01
  20. Putri, Kania Dewi Andhika, & Arifin, Ridwan.(2018). Tinjauan Teoritis Keadilan dan Kepastian Dalam Hukum di Indonesia. Mimbar Yustisia, Vol.2,(No.2),pp.142-158. https://doi.org/10.5 2166/mimbar.v2i2.1344
  21. Sagama, S.(2015). Reformulasi Hierarki Peraturan pada Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Volksgeist, Vol.1,(No.2),pp.185-197. https://doi.org/10. 24090/VOLKSGEIST.V1I2.1967
  22. Selian, Della Luysky., & Melina, Cailin.(2018). Kebebasan Berekspresi Di Era Demokrasi: Catatan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia. Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol.2,(No.2),pp.189-198. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27589
  23. Sianipar, Erick Clark., & Isharyanto.(2020). Analisis Larangan Keanggotaan Partai Politik Bagi Pengurus Rukun Tetangga dan Rukun Warga Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Politik Sebagai Prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia. Res Publica, Vol.4(No.1),pp.1-12. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/res publica/article/view/44582/28174
  24. Sudarsono.(2017). Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Bawah Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Agung. Mimbar Yustitia, Vol.1,(No.2),pp.147–169. https://doi.org/10. 52166/mimbar.v1i2.832
  25. Sudrajat, Tedi., & Hartini, Sri.(2017). Rekonstruksi Hukum Atas Pola Penanganan Pelanggaran Asas Netralitas Pegawai. Mimbar Hukum, Vol.29,(No.3),pp.445–460. https://doi.org/10.22 146/jmh.26233
  26. Wardhani, Dini M. (2018). Disharmoni Pengaturan Izin Gangguan Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2017. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, Vol.5,(No.2),pp.81-89. https://doi.org/10.2674/ novum.v5i2.36037
  27. Zahrotunimah.,Yunus, Nur Rohim., & Susilowati, Ida.(2018). Rekonstruksi Teori Komunikasi Politik Dalam Membangun Persepsi Publik. Rechstaat: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal,Vol.2,(No.2),pp.15-28. https://doi.org/ 10.15408/siclj.v2i2.11186
  28. Ashri, M. (2018). Hak Asasi Manusia: Filosofi, Teori & Instrumen Dasar. Makasar: CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn.)
  29. Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
  30. Marzuki, Peter. M. (2020). Teori Hukum “The House Of Law Is The House Of Mankind”. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group
  31. Soekanto, Soerjono., & Mamudji, Sri. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  32. Rauf, Rahyunir., & Munaf, Yusri. (2015). Lembaga Kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PT. Zanafa Publishing
  33. Kurnianto, K. (2018). Tjahjo: Pengurus RT/RW Dilarang Berpolitik, Kecuali atas Nama Pribadi. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/ kumparannews/tjahjo-pengurus-rt-rw-dilarang-berpolitik-kecuali-atas-nama-pribadi-1542004680882386157

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-13 00:41:19

No citation recorded.