BibTex Citation Data :
@article{NTS47253, author = {Hasna Farida and Siti Badriyah}, title = {Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kreditor dan Debt Collector}, journal = {Notarius}, volume = {17}, number = {1}, year = {2024}, keywords = {execution; fiduciary; constitutional court decision}, abstract = { Abstract The Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 impacts the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee, so it needs to be discussed further. This study aims to determine and analyze the arrangements for the execution of fiduciary guarantees before and after the Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, as well as the implementation of that Decision from the perspective of creditors and debt collectors. This empirical juridical research is descriptive-analytical. The arrangement for the execution of fiduciary guarantees before the Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 is regulated in Article 15 and Article 29 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, Articles 195-200 HIR, PMK Number 27/PMK.06/2016 and DJKN Regulation Number 2 /KN/2017. After the Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, if there is no agreement on breach of contract and the debtor objected to submitting the collateral voluntarily, the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee is carried out by executing the judge's assistance and conducting an auction using PMK Number 213/PMK.06/2020. The implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 is viewed from the perspective of creditors and debt collectors, namely, even though there has been approval from the debtor to withdraw the object of Collateral, it is carried out in ways that are not appropriate, and there are still many forced withdrawals. Keywords: execution; fiduciary; constitutional court decision Abstrak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 berdampak pada eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia sehingga perlu diteliti lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan eksekusi jaminan fidusia sebelum dan setelah adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, serta implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 ditinjau dari perspektif kreditor dan debt collector . Penelitian yuridis empiris ini bersifat deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, Pengaturan eksekusi jaminan fidusia sebelum Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 diatur dalam Pasal 15 dan Pasal 29 UU Jaminan Fidusia, Pasal 195-200 HIR, PMK Nomor 27/PMK.06/2016 dan Peraturan DJKN Nomor 2/KN/2017. Setelah adanya Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, jika tidak ada kesepakatan tentang cidera janji dan debitor keberatan menyerahkan objek jaminan secara sukarela, maka eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dilakukan dengan eksekusi pertolongan hakim dan pelaksanaan lelang menggunakan PMK Nomor 213/PMK.06/2020. Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 ditinjau dari perspektif kreditor dan debt collector yakni meskipun telah ada persetujuan dari debitor untuk menarik objek Jaminan, akan tetapi dilakukan dengan cara-cara yang tidak seharusnya dan masih banyak penarikan paksa yang dilakukan. Kata kunci: eksekusi, fidusia, putusan mahkamah konstitusi }, issn = {2686-2425}, pages = {356--369} doi = {10.14710/nts.v17i1.47253}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/47253} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Abstract
The Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 impacts the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee, so it needs to be discussed further. This study aims to determine and analyze the arrangements for the execution of fiduciary guarantees before and after the Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, as well as the implementation of that Decision from the perspective of creditors and debt collectors. This empirical juridical research is descriptive-analytical. The arrangement for the execution of fiduciary guarantees before the Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 is regulated in Article 15 and Article 29 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, Articles 195-200 HIR, PMK Number 27/PMK.06/2016 and DJKN Regulation Number 2 /KN/2017. After the Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, if there is no agreement on breach of contract and the debtor objected to submitting the collateral voluntarily, the execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee is carried out by executing the judge's assistance and conducting an auction using PMK Number 213/PMK.06/2020. The implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 is viewed from the perspective of creditors and debt collectors, namely, even though there has been approval from the debtor to withdraw the object of Collateral, it is carried out in ways that are not appropriate, and there are still many forced withdrawals.
Keywords: execution; fiduciary; constitutional court decision
Abstrak
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 berdampak pada eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia sehingga perlu diteliti lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan eksekusi jaminan fidusia sebelum dan setelah adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, serta implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 ditinjau dari perspektif kreditor dan debt collector. Penelitian yuridis empiris ini bersifat deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, Pengaturan eksekusi jaminan fidusia sebelum Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 diatur dalam Pasal 15 dan Pasal 29 UU Jaminan Fidusia, Pasal 195-200 HIR, PMK Nomor 27/PMK.06/2016 dan Peraturan DJKN Nomor 2/KN/2017. Setelah adanya Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, jika tidak ada kesepakatan tentang cidera janji dan debitor keberatan menyerahkan objek jaminan secara sukarela, maka eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dilakukan dengan eksekusi pertolongan hakim dan pelaksanaan lelang menggunakan PMK Nomor 213/PMK.06/2020. Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 ditinjau dari perspektif kreditor dan debt collector yakni meskipun telah ada persetujuan dari debitor untuk menarik objek Jaminan, akan tetapi dilakukan dengan cara-cara yang tidak seharusnya dan masih banyak penarikan paksa yang dilakukan.
Kata kunci: eksekusi, fidusia, putusan mahkamah konstitusi
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-11-21 18:09:29
Ciptaan berjudul (Notarius, dibuat oleh Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro), diidentifikasi oleh Notarius, bebas dari batasan hak cipta yang berlaku.
Journal Notarius is present by Public Notary, Diponegoro UniversityImam Bardjo, S.H. No.1-3 SemarangEmail: jurnalmkn.undip@gmail.comPhone: 0248415998Website: http://notariat.undip.ac.id