DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v19i2.341-350

Decision-Making Strategy of Hospital Waste Management Using the TOPSIS Method

*Dino Rimantho orcid scopus  -  Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia
Gita Azizah Putri  -  Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Clinical waste is likely to include disease-causing microorganisms, chemical wastes, and other treatments used to treat different conditions, whether solid or liquid. As a result, clinical wastes have a more significant potential for pathogenicity and toxicity than most other types of waste in all of their forms. This study aims to design a strategic decision model for managing medical waste from hospitals. The method used in this research is the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The data was collected using a questionnaire distributed to three people from various fields: hospital waste management experts, academics, and the environmental service. The results show that the preference for the best hospital waste management strategy is SOP improvement with a weight of 0.6576. Furthermore, the alternative of investing in environmentally friendly technology, 3R campaigns, and outreach to employees and visitors received a weight of about 0.4885, 0.2973, and 0.3393, respectively. This study can be a reference for research related to decision-making strategies and the field of hospital waste management.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Clinical; hospital; waste; decision; TOPSIS

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Adsorption of Dyes Using Graphene Oxide-Based Nano-Adsorbent: A Review Constructed Wetlands for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage: A Review Effect of Fly Ash Variation and Heating Temperature on Physical Properties, Chemical Composition, Phase Structure, and Morphology in Making Red Brick Solid Medical Waste Management of Hazardous and Toxic at UNS Hospital Surakarta Environmental Performance with Firm Size as an Intervening Variable Review-Design of Drainage System of Kedungmundu Road, Semarang City with the Implementation of the Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) The Effects of Community Characteristics on Solid-Waste Generation and Management in the Village (A Case Study: Kurandak, North Sumatra) Planning of Conventional Air Emission Reduction Strategy from the Transportation, Domestic, and Solid Waste Sector in Salatiga City More recent articles
Most cited articles
POLA PENYEBARAN LIMPASAN LOGAM LINDI TPA JATIBARANG PADA AIR SUNGAI KREO ORGANIC WASTE'S POTENTIAL AS RENEWABLE ENERGY AT SUPIT URANG LANDFILL IN MALANG CITY UNJUK KERJA MODIFIKASI SBR AEROB TERHADAP PENYISIHAN COD EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH RUMAH SAKIT PUSAT ANGKATAN DARAT GATOT SOEBROTO STUDI PEMBUATAN KOMPOS PADAT DARI SAMPAH DAUN KERING TPST UNDIP DENGAN VARIASI BAHAN MIKROORGANISME LOKAL (MOL) DAUN More cited articles
  1. Abd El-Salam, M.M. 2010. Hospital waste management in El-Beheira Governorate, The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change 91, 618–629
  2. Abessi, O., and Saeedi, M. 2014. "Hazardous Waste Landfill Siting using GIS Technique and Analytical Hierarchy Process. EnvironmentAsia 7(2),104–111
  3. Ali, M., Yadav, A., Anis, M., and Sharma, P. 2015. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Using Dea-TOPSIS Method for Hazardous Waste Management: A Case Study of The USA," International Journal of Information Technology and Management 7(3),1–17
  4. Alves, M.C.M., Lima, B.S.L.P., Evsukoff, A.G., Vieira, I.N. 2009. Developing a fuzzy decision support system to determine the location of a landfill site. Waste Management & Research 27 , 641–651
  5. Anisur, R.K., Shafiul, A., Manzurul, H.M., Tarit, B. 2008. Pattern of medical waste management: Existing scenario in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 8, 36
  6. Ariasih, N.K., Bayupati, I.P.A., Putra, I.K.G.D. 2015. Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan lokasi TPA sampah menggunakan metode min_max inference fuzzy. Jurnal Teknologi Elektro 14 (1), 7–10
  7. Behzadian, M,. Otaghsara, S.K., Yazdani, M., Ignatius, J. 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications: Review, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 13051–13069
  8. Boskovic, G. Jovicic, N. 2015. Fast methodology to design the optimal collection point locations and number of waste bins: A case study. Waste Management & Research 33 (12), 1094 – 1102
  9. Buyukozkan, G., and F. Gocer. 2016. Selection of medical waste logistic firms by using AHP-TOPSIS methodology, International Journal of Biology and Biomedicine 1
  10. Chartier, Y. 2014. Safe Management of Wastes from Health-Care Activities; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland
  11. Chartier, Y., Pieper, U., Prüss, A.E.A. 2014. Safe Management of Wastes from Health Care Activities; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland
  12. Chabuk, A., Al-Ansari, N., Hussain, H.M., Knutsson, S., Pusch, R. 2016. Landfill site selection using geographic information system and analytical hierarchy process: A case study Al-Hillah Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Waste Management & Research 34 (1), 1–11
  13. Ho C., Chen, M. 2017. Appling the Analytic Hierarchy Process as the Risk Evaluation Model to Improve Hospital Biomedical Waste Disposal Outsourcing Quality, International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences Special Issue-International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI 2017) 6(S1), 230 – 243
  14. Coelho, L.M.G., Lange, L.C., Coelho, H.M.G. 2017. Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods. Waste Management & Research 35 (1), 3 – 28
  15. Diaz, L.F., Savage, G.M., Eggerth, L.L. 2005. Alternatives for the treatment and disposal of healthcare wastes in developing countries. Waste Management 25, 626–637
  16. Fadhullah, W., Imran, N.I.N., Ismail, S.N.S. Jaafar, M.H., and Abdullah, H. 2022. Household solid waste management practices and perceptions among residents in the East Coast of Malaysia, BMC Public Health. 22:1
  17. Hossain, M.S., Santhanam, A., Norulaini, N.N., Omar, A.M. 2011. Clinical solid waste management practices and its impact on human health and environment—A review. Waste Management 31, 754–766
  18. Ho, C.C. 2011. Optimal evaluation of infectious medical waste disposal companies using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process., Waste Manag 31(7), 1553–9
  19. Hsu, P.F., Wu C.R., and Li, Y.T. 2008. Selection of infectious medical waste disposal firms by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Waste Manag 28(8), 1386–94
  20. Iqbal, S.T.Z., Razzaq, S. 2017. Novel Healthcare Solution for Smart Hospitals: A Qualitative Review. Biomed. Lett 3, 99–106
  21. Khan, B.A., Cheng, L. Khan, A.A., Ahmed, H. 2019. Unsafe small clinics practices causing new HIV outbreaks in Pakistan. J. Hosp. Infect
  22. Kharat, M.G., Kamble, S.S., Kamble, S.J., Dhume, S..M., Raut, R.D. 2016. Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Modelling Earth System Environment 2 , 53
  23. Liao, C., and Ho, C.C. 2014. Risk management for outsourcing biomedical waste disposal– Using the failure mode and effects analysis. Waste management 34(7), 1324-1329
  24. Manga, V.E., Forton, O.T., Mofor, L.A., Woodard, R. 2011. Health care waste management in Cameroon: A case study from the Southwestern Region. Resource Conservation & Recycling 57, 108–116
  25. Munier, N., Hontoria, E., Jiménez-Sáez, F. 2019. Strategic Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making : A Practical Guide for Complex Scenarios, Springer. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/polije-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5654954 (Accessed: May 25, 2022)
  26. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operation Research 156 (2), 445–455
  27. Patil, A.D., Shekdar, A.V. 2001. Healthcare waste management in India. Journal of Environment Management 63, 211–220
  28. Patwary, M.A., O'Hare, W.T., Sarker, M.H. 2011. Assessment of occupational and environmental safety associated with medical waste disposal in developing countries: A qualitative approach. Saf. Sci. 49, 1200–1207
  29. Paul, S. 2012. Location allocation for urban waste disposal site using multi-criteria analysis: A study on Nabadwip Municipality, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 3 (1), 74 – 88
  30. Prüss, A., Giroult, E., Rushbrook, P. 1999. Safe Management of Wastes from Health-Care Activities; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland
  31. Putra, G.M., Siddik, M., Lubis, A.P., Nuriadi, A. 2021. Application of TOPSIS Method in Exemplary Selection at the Tanjungbalai District Court, Virtual Conference on Engineering, Science and Technology (ViCEST) 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933, 012063
  32. Rimantho, D., and Tamba, M. 2021. Usulan Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah Padat di TPA Burangkeng Bekasi dengan Pendekatan SWOT dan AHP, Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 19 (2), 383-391
  33. Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
  34. Sapkota, B., Gupta, G.K., and Mainali, D. 2014. Impact of Intervention on Healthcare Waste Management Practices in a Tertiary Care Governmental Hospital of Nepal, BMC Public Health 14(1), 1–8
  35. Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S.S., Thakur, L.S. 2012. Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (9), 8182–8192
  36. Singh, A.P., Dubey, S.K. 2012. Optimal Selection of a Landfill Disposal Site Using a Modified Fuzzy Utility Approach. Fuzzy Information and Engineering 3 , 313-338. DOI 10.1007/s12543-012-0118-9
  37. Torabi-Kaveh, M., Babazadeh, R., Mohammadi, S.D., Zaresefat, M. 2016. Landfill site selection using combination of GIS and fuzzy AHP, a case study: Iranshahr, Iran. Waste Management & Research 34 (5), 438-448
  38. Windfeld, E.S., Brooks, S.L. 2015. Medical waste management—A review. Journal of Environment Management 163, 98–108

Last update:

  1. The strategy for developing wood pellets as sustainable renewable energy in Indonesia

    Dino Rimantho, Nur Yulianti Hidayah, Vector Anggit Pratomo, Agung Saputra, Ilhamsyah Akbar, Anggina Sandy Sundari. Heliyon, 9 (3), 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14217

Last update: 2024-12-27 02:16:41

No citation recorded.