skip to main content

Affecting Factors of Generation and Weight Domestic Waste in Tanjung Karang Village Mataram City

*Astrini Widiyanti scopus  -  Universitas Nahdatul Ulama NTB, Indonesia
Taufikul Hadi  -  Universitas Nahdatul Ulama NTB, Indonesia
Moh. Irvan  -  UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:

Tanjung Karang Village is a priority tourism destination. Strategic tourist destinations need to maintain environmental cleanliness to achieve sustainable waste management to create comfort and satisfaction for visitors. The purpose of this study is to analyze the generation, weight, composition of waste, and influencing factors. The method in this study is a field survey to measure the generation and weight of waste with 13 households sample for 8 days. Data analysis has analyzed the Kolmogorov Smirnov Normality Test and the Dummy Variable Multiple Regression Test. The waste generation in Tanjung Karang Village is 3 liters/person/day and the weight of waste is 0.5 kg/person/day. The composition of the most waste is 56% organic waste. 28% plastic. and the others are metal, B3 waste, paper, glass, and so on. The most widely used plastic waste is food packaging plastic, High Density (HD), and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE). Influencing factors the generation and weight of waste are type of house, number of occupants, land area, occupation, and income. The recommendation for waste management in Tanjung Karang Village is that 56% of organic waste can be processed by composting, ecoenzyme, and biopore holes. Plastic waste 18% can be reduced by using plastic converted into containers.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Urban waste; waste generation; the composition of waste; influencing factors, dummy variable multiple regression
Funding: Universitas Nahdatul Ulama NTB

Article Metrics:

  1. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 1994. Metode Pengambilan dan Pengukuran Contoh Timbulan dan Komposisi Sampah Perkotaan
  2. Garcia I.O, Esteban O.K, Martin C, Arenaza A.M, Vicario A.A. 2015. Identification of influencing municipal characteristics regarding household waste generation and their forecasting ability in Biscay. Journal Waste Management 39: 26 – 34
  3. Han Z, Liu Y, Zhong M, Shi GM, Li Q, Zhang Z.Y, Fei Y, Xie Y. 2017. Influencing factors of domestic waste characteristics in rural areas developing countries. Journal Waste Management 72: 45 - 54
  4. Juanda B. 2009. Ekonometrika Pemodelan dan Pendugaan. IPB Press
  5. Kolekar K.A, Hazra T, Chakrabarty S.N. 2016. A Review On Prediction of Municipal Solid Waste Generation Model. Procedia Encironmental Sciences 35: 238 - 244
  6. Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum. 2015. Dokumen Rencana Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jangka Panjang RPI2JM 2015 – 2019
  7. Shafy H.I.A. Mansour M.S.M. 2018. Solid Waste Issue: Sources. composition. disposal. recycling. and valirization. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 27: 1275-1290
  8. Palanivel T.M, Sulaiman H. 2014. Generation and Composition of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. APCBEE Procedia 10 (2014) 96 – 102
  9. Pakpour A, Zeidi MI, Emamjomeh MM, Asefzdeh S, Pearson H. 2014. Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Waste Management 34 (6): 980 – 986
  10. Ramadan B.S, Rachman I, Matsumo T. 2022. Activity and emission inventory of open waste burning at household level developing countries: a case study of Semarang City. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 24: 1194 - 1204
  11. Shi Y, Wang Y, Yue Y, Zhao J, Maraseni T, Qian G. 2021. Unbalanced status and multidimensional influences of municipal solid waste management in Africa. Journal Chemosphere 281: 130884
  12. Tang D, Shi L, Huang X, Zhao Z, Zhou B, Bethel B. 2022. Influencing Factors on Household Waste Classification Behaviour of Urban Residents: A Case in Shanghai. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 6528
  13. Trang P.T.T. Dong H.Q. Toan D.H. Hanh N.T.X. Thu N.T. 2017. The Effects of Socio-Economic Factors on Househould Solid Waste Generation and Composition: A Case Studi in Thu Dau Mot. Vietnam. Energy Procedia 107: 253 – 258
  14. Vassanadumrongdee S, Kittipongvies S. 2018. Factors Influencing Source Separation Intention and Willingness To Pay for Improving Waste Management in Bangkok Thailand. Sustainable Environment Research 28: 90–99
  15. Vieira V.H.A.M, Matheus D.R. 2017. The impact of socioeconomic factors in municipal solid waste generation in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal Waste Management and Research 36:1
  16. Wu Y, Tian X, Li X, Yuan X, Liu G. 2019. Characteristics, influencing factors, and environmental effects of plate waste at university canteen in Beijing China. Journal Resources, Conservation, and Recyling 149: 151- 159
  17. Yousouf T.B. Rahman M. 2007. Monitoring Quantity and Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste in Dhaka City. Environ Monit Asess 135: 3 – 11
  18. Yusof, M.B, Othman F, Hasim N, Ali N.C. 2022. The Role Of Social Economic and Circular Factors In Municipal Solid Waste Generation: A Case Study in Taman Perling, Johor Baru. Jurnal Teknologi 37 (F): 55 - 64

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-02-29 21:44:59

No citation recorded.