Phase Change Material on Augmentation of Fresh Water Production Using Pyramid Solar Still

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2.3.115-120

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Published: 30-10-2013
Section: Original Research Article
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author

The augmentation of fresh water and increase in the solar still efficiency of a triangular pyramid is added with phase change material (PCM) on the basin. Experimental studies were conducted and the effects of production of fresh water with and without PCM were investigated. Using paraffin as the PCM material, performance of the solar still were conducted on a hot, humid climate of Chennai (13°5′ 2" North, 80°16′ 12"East), India. The use of paraffin wax increases the latent heat storage so that the energy is stored in the PCM and in the absence of solar radiation it rejects its stored heat into the basin for further evaporation of water from the basin. Temperatures of water, Tw, Temperature of phase change material, TPCM, Temperature of cover, Tc were measured using thermocouple. Results show that there is an increase of maximum 20%, in productivity of fresh water with PCM.

Keywords: fresh water production; PCM; thermal energy storage; phase change material
  1. S. Ravishankara 
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science ,Chennai, India
  2. P.K. Nagarajan 
    Department of Mechanical Engineering,S.A.Engineering College, Chennai, India
  3. D. Vijayakumar 
    Department of Mechanical Engineering Veltech Multitech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India
  4. M.K. Jawahar 
    Department of Mechanical Engineering Veltech Multitech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, India
  1. Dashtban, M., & Tabrizi, F.F. (2011) Thermal analysis of a weir-type cascade solar still integrated with PCM storage. Desalination, 279, 415-42
  2. Delyannis, E. (2003) Historic Background of Desalination and Renewable Energies. Sol. Energy, 75(5), 357–366.
  3. Dunkle, R.V. (1961) Solar Water Distillation: The Roof Type Still and a Multiple Effect Diffusion Still. Proceedings of the International Development in Heat Transfer, ASME, University of Colorado, Pt. V, p. 895.
  4. El-Sebaii, A. (2000) Effect of wind speed on some designs of solar stills, Energy Conversion and Management, 41(6), 523–538
  5. Hay, H.R. (1965) New Concepts in Solar Still Design. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Water Desalination, Washington, DC, 1, 511–527.
  6. Hay, H.R. (1973) Plastic Solar Stills: Past, Present, and Future. Sol. Energy, 14(4), 393–404.
  7. Kumar, S., & Tiwari, G.N. (1996) Estimation of Convective Mass Transfer in Solar Distillation System. Sol. Energy, 57, 459–464.
  8. Malik, M.A.S., Tiwari, G.N., Kumar, A., & Sodha, M.S. (1982) Solar Distillation, Pergamon Press, London.
  9. Radhwan, A.M. (2004) Transient performance of stepped solar still with built in latent heat thermal energy storage. Desalination, 171, 61–76
  10. Tabrizi, F.F., Dashtban, M., & Moghaddam, H. (2010) Experimental investigation of a weir-type cascade solar still with built-in latent heat thermal energy storage system. Desalination, 260, 248–253.
  11. Tiwari, G.N., & Lawrence, S.A. (1999) New Heat and Mass Transfer Relations for a Still. Energy Convers. Manage, 31, 201–203.
  12. Tripathi, R., & Tiwari, G. N. (2005) Effect of Water Depth on Internal Heat and Mass Transfer for Active Solar Distillation. Desalination, 173, 73–88.