Energetic and exergetic Improvement of geothermal single flash cycle

*Navid Nazari  -  islamic azad university, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Soheil Porkhial  -  doctor of philosophy, Mechanical engineering, Karaj islamic azad university, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Published: 15 Jul 2016.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2016 International Journal of Renewable Energy Development

Citation Format:

This paper presents a detailed analysis of a new method for improving energetic and exergetic efficiencies of single flash cycle. The thermodynamic process of the new method consists of extracting a fraction of hot wellhead geothermal brine for the purpose of superheating saturated steam entering the turbine. Computer programming scripts were developed and optimized based on mathematical proposed models for the different components of the systems. The operating parameters such as separator temperature, geofluid wellhead enthalpy and geothermal source temperature are varied to investigate their effects on both net power output and turbine exhaust quality of the systems. Also, full exergy assessment was performed for the new design. The results of separator temperature optimization revealed that specific net power output of the new design can be boosted up to 8% and turbine exhaust quality can be diminished up to 50% as compared to common single flash cycle. In addition, for wells with higher discharge enthalpy, superheating process improve specific net power output even up to 10%. Finally, it was observed that the overall system exergy efficiency was approximately raised 3%.


Article History: Received January 5th 2016; Received in revised form June 25th 2016; Accepted July 3rd 2016; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Nazari, N. and Porkhial, S. (2016). Energetic and Exergetic Improvement of Geothermal Single Flash Cycle. Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 5(2),129-138.



Keywords: Geothermal energy;Single flash cycle;Excess enthalpy;Exergy;Efficiency;Super heater.

Article Metrics:

  1. Abas, N., A. Kalair, and N. Khan. 2015. Review Of Fossil Fuels And Future Energy Technologies. Futures 69: 31-49. Elsevier BV
  2. Ahmad, M., M. Casey, and N. Sürken. 2009. Experimental Assessment Of Droplet Impact Erosion Resistance Of Steam Turbine Blade Materials. Wear 267, no. 9-10: 1605-1618. Elsevier BV
  3. Bidini, G., U. Desideri, F. Maria, A. Baldacci, R. Papale, and F. Sabatelli. 1998. Optimization Of An Integrated Gas Turbine–Geothermal Power Plant. Energy Conversion And Management 39, no. 16-18: 1945-1956. Elsevier BV
  4. Chamorro, C., M. Mondéjar, R. Ramos, J. Segovia, M. Martín, and M. Villamañán. 2012. World Geothermal Power Production Status: Energy, Environmental And Economic Study Of High Enthalpy Technologies. Energy 42, no. 1: 10-18. Elsevier BV
  5. Coskun, C., Z. Oktay, and I. Dincer. 2011. Modified Exergoeconomic Modeling Of Geothermal Power Plants. Energy 36, no. 11: 6358-6366. Elsevier BV
  6. Daǧdaş, A., R. Öztürk, and Ş. Bekdemir. 2005. Thermodynamic Evaluation Of DenizliKızıldere Geothermal Power Plant And Its Performance Improvement. Energy Conversion And Management 46, no. 2: 245-256. Elsevier BV
  7. Dincer, I. 2007. Exergetic And Sustainability Aspects Of Green Energy Systems. Clean Soil Air Water 35, no. 4: 311-322. Wiley-Blackwell
  8. Dincer, I., and C. Zamfirescu. 2012. Renewable-Energy-Based Multigeneration Systems. International Journal Of Energy Research 36, no. 15: 1403-1415. Wiley-Blackwell
  9. DiPippo, R. 2015. Geothermal Power Plants: Evolution And Performance Assessments. Geothermics 53: 291-307. Elsevier BV
  10. DiPippo, R. 2012.Single-Flash Steam Power Plants.Geothermal Power Plants: 81-109. Elsevier BV
  11. Jalilinasrabady, S., R. Itoi, P. Valdimarsson, G. Saevarsdottir, and H. Fujii. 2012. Flash Cycle Optimization Of Sabalan Geothermal Power Plant Employing Exergy Concept. Geothermics 43: 75-82. Elsevier BV
  12. Mathieu-Potvin, F. 2013. Self-Superheating: A New Paradigm For Geothermal Power Plant Design. Geothermics 48: 16-30. Elsevier BV
  13. Matlab,. 2010. MATLAB (version version 7.10.0 (R2010a). Natick, Massachusetts, United States.: The MathWorks Inc
  14. Phillips, J. 2010. Evaluating The Level And Nature Of Sustainable Development For A Geothermal Power Plant.Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 8: 2414-2425. Elsevier BV
  15. REFPROP,. 2010. Transport Properties Database (REFPROP V9.0). (versionVersion 9.0). National Institue of Standards and Technology (NIST)
  16. Rosen, M., and I. Dincer. 2001. Exergy As The Confluence Of Energy, Environment And Sustainable Development. Exergy, An International Journal 1, no. 1: 3-13. Elsevier BV
  17. Rosen, M., and I. Dincer. 2004. Effect Of Varying Dead-State Properties On Energy And Exergy Analyses Of Thermal Systems. International Journal Of Thermal Sciences 43, no. 2: 121-133. Elsevier BV
  18. Wang, J., J. Wang, Y. Dai, and P. Zhao. 2015. Thermodynamic Analysis And Optimization Of A Flash-Binary Geothermal Power Generation System. Geothermics 55: 69-77. Elsevier BV
  19. Zarrouk, S., and M. Purnanto. 2015. Geothermal Steam-Water Separators: Design Overview. Geothermics 53: 236-254. Elsevier BV
  20. Zhou, C. 2014.Hybridisation Of Solar And Geothermal Energy In Both Subcritical And Supercritical Organic RankineCycles.Energy Conversion And Management 81: 72-82. Elsevier BV

Last update: 2021-03-05 19:49:55

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-03-05 19:49:55

  1. Tax incentive policy for geothermal development: A comparative analysis in ASEAN

    Abidin M.Z.. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9 (1), 2020. doi: 10.14710/ijred.9.1.53-62