skip to main content

Dinamika Gerakan Lingkungan dan Global Environmental Governance

*Yety Rochwulaningsih orcid  -  Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Melalui metode sejarah kritis dengan pendekatan politik ekologi, tulisan ini mengkaji peristiwa bencana alam tanah longsor yang menjadi ancaman serius terhadap kehidupan masyarakat. Intensitas bencana tanah longsor yang semakin tinggi dan merata di berbagai kawasan di Indonesia tidak terlepas dari kebijakan ekonomi politik pemerintah dalam memanfaatkan sumber daya alam dan masifnya penetrasi sistem ekonomi kapitalis global yang sangat ekspansif dan eksploitatif terhadap sumber daya alam. Fakta empirik implementasi UU No.5/1967, UU No. 11/1967, UU No. 5/1990, dan TAP MPR No IX/2001, justru menjadi pintu masuk bagi pemanfaatan sumber daya alam melebihi carrying capacity yang berdampak terhadap kerusakan ekosistem dan bencana alam yang menjadi ancaman serius kehidupan masyarakat.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Politik Ekologi; Kerusakan Ekosistem; Longsor; Ekonomi Kapitalis

Article Metrics:

  1. Baso, Ahmad. 1999. Civil Society Versus Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: Pustaka Hidayah
  2. Booth, A. 1989. ‘Export and growth in the colonial economy, 1830-1940’, dalam A. Maddison & G. Prince. Eds. Economic growth in Indonesia 1820-1940. Dordrecht/Providence: Foris, hlm. 67-96
  3. Booth, A. 1990. ‘Foreign trade and domestic development in the colonial economy‘, dalam A. Booth, W.J. O’Malley & A. Weidemann. Eds. Indonesian economic history in the Dutch colonial era. New Haven: Yale University Press, hlm. 210-243
  4. Campbell, T. 1993. Applying a Biosocial Perspective on the Family. New York: Plenum
  5. Castro, C.J. 2004. Sustainable Development.Mainstream and Critical Perspectives. Sage Publication
  6. Clifford Geertz. 1976. Involusi Pertanian. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara
  7. Diesendorf, M and Hamilton, C. (1997). Human Ecology, Human Economy: Ideas for an Ecologically Sustainable Future. NSW: Allen & Unwin
  8. Dharmawan, Arya Hadi. (2005). Gerakan Sosial Lingkungan dan Perubahan Titik Berat Kekuatan Politik Sipil Era Demokrasi. Bogor: Bahan Suplemen Matakuliah Ekologi Politik Pedesaan S3 Pada Program Studi Sosiologi Pedesaan Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB
  9. Dwivedi, Ranjit. 2001. Environmental Movements in the Global South. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Public
  10. Emmerson, K.Donald. 1972. Exploring Elite Political Culture In Indonesia: Countinuity and Change. Ann Aribor, Michigan : University of Microfilm International
  11. Forsyth, Tim. 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science”. London: Routlegde
  12. Giddens, A. 1996. Capitalism, Industrialism, and Transformation of Nature, in Goblatt D (Ed). Social Theory and The Environment. Cambridge: Polity Press
  13. http://dte.gn.apc.org/59ifr.htm. Protes Terhadap Bencana Fatal Di Tambang Freeport/Rio Tinto Papua Barat
  14. http://www.jatam.org/indonesia/berita/uploaded/docbrt10.html. Mendukung Masyarakat Indonesia Melawan Dehumanisasi Dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Oleh Industri Tambang, Minyak dan Gas
  15. http://www.smeru.or.id/beritadaerah/files/tolaktambanggalianc.htm. Walhi Dukung Penolakan Warga Watusampu: Penambangan Sirtukil Sebabkan Kerusakan Lingkungan Dan Penyakit ISPA
  16. http://dte.gn.apc.org/44ite.htm. Protes Di Pabrik Pulp PT Tel
  17. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Bioregionalrevolution. TheBioregional Revolutionary Movement. tanggal 4 Januari 2006
  18. Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. Resource Mobilization Theory And The Studi Of Social Movements. Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved
  19. Langhelle, Oluf. 1999. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Ethics of Our Common Future. International Political Science Review Vol 20 No. 2, 129-149.London: Sage Publication
  20. Nicoll, Geoffrey Mc. 1989. Social Organization and Ecological Stability under Demographic Stress. Population and Development Review. Vol 15. 1989. 147-167. http://www.jstor.org/
  21. Pingali, Prabhu L. 1989. Institutional and Environmental Constraints to Agricultural Intensification. Population and Development Review. Vol 15. 1989. 243-260. http://www.jstor.org/
  22. Prijono, Onny S., 1995. ‘Peran Organisasi Nirlaba, Lembaga Pengembangan Swadaya Masyarakat dan Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat serta Pola Interaksi dengan Pemerintah’ dalam Bantarto Bandono, dkk. 1995. Refleksi Setengah Abad Kemerdekaan Indonesiai. Jakarta: CSIS
  23. Robinson, Ricard. 1984. Sejarah Politik Orde Baru. Jakarta : LSP
  24. Ross, Eric B. 2003. Malthusianisme, Capitalist Agriculture, and the Fate of Peasants in the Making of the Modern World System. Netherlands: Union for Radical Political Economics. Vol 35, No. 4, Fall 2003, 437-461
  25. Sajogyo. 1974. Modernization Without Development In Rural Java. Bogor : Makalah tidak diterbitkan
  26. Sudharto, P. Hadi. 2006. Mengurai Bencana Banjarnegara. Semarang: Suara Merdeka 11 Januari 2006. Hal. 6 & 9
  27. van der Eng, P., 1993. The ‘colonial drain’ from Indonesia, 1823-1990. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies Australian National University
  28. Veltmeyer, Henry. 2004. Globalization and antiglobalization : dynamics of change in the New World order. Ashgate: Aldershot
  29. Yearley, Steven 1997. ‘Social Movements and Environmental Change’, dalam: Michael Redclift & Ted Benton eds. 1997. Social Theory and The Global Environment. London & New York: Roudledge

Last update:

  1. Fight for the green earth: The existence of local knowledge in agriculture

    H Halim, S Bahri, R Zainuddin, S A Kamaruddin, H B Anriani. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 473 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/473/1/012026
  2. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Housewives As Members of the Environmental Community Against Household Food Waste Management

    Kartini Aryani Zahara, Hasibuan Hayati Sari, Tumuyu Sri Setiawati, T.R. Soeprobowati, B. Warsito, T. Triadi Putranto. E3S Web of Conferences, 317 , 2021. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131701066
  3. Comparison of Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction Protocols with Face Mask Therapy

    Göksu Emek Kayafoğlu, Elçin Esenlik. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 36 (4), 2023. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.141
  4. Diode Laser versus Conventional Surgical Circumferential Supracrestal Fiberotomy in Preventing Relapse of Orthodontically Derotated Teeth: A Randomised Control Trial

    Swati Kharb, Abhita Malhotra, Puneet Batra, Nitin Arora, Ashish Kumar Singh. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 36 (4), 2023. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.31
  5. A SWOT Analysis of Takakura Compost as a Treatment for Household Food Waste (Case Study in Pondok Labu Urban Village)

    A Z Kartini, H S Hasibuan, S S Tumuyu. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 940 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/940/1/012075

Last update: 2024-05-21 16:22:40

  1. Fight for the green earth: The existence of local knowledge in agriculture

    H Halim, S Bahri, R Zainuddin, S A Kamaruddin, H B Anriani. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 473 (1), 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/473/1/012026