Mendebat Wali Nanggroe: Tinjauan Sejarah dan Respons terhadap Qanun Aceh No. 10 Tahun 2019 Tentang Lembaga Wali Nanggroe

Imam Hadi Sutrisno; Yety Rochwulaningsih; Ahmad Muhajir; Sukirno Sukirno; T. Junaedi; Hanif Harahap; Aulia Rahman

doi:10.14710/jscl.v7i1.34520

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jscl.v7i1.34520

Mendebat Wali Nanggroe: Tinjauan Sejarah dan Respons terhadap Qanun Aceh No. 10 Tahun 2019 Tentang Lembaga Wali Nanggroe

*Imam Hadi Sutrisno

- Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Keguruan dan Pendidikan, Universitas Samudra, Indonesia

Yety Rochwulaningsih

- Program Studi Doktor Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Ahmad Muhajir - Program Studi Ilmu Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

Sukirno Sukirno - Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Keguruan dan Pendidikan, Universitas Samudra, Indonesia

T. Junaedi - Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Keguruan dan Pendidikan, Universitas Samudra, Indonesia

Hanif Harahap - Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Keguruan dan Pendidikan, Universitas Samudra, Indonesia

Aulia Rahman - Program Studi Ilmu Sejarah, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:

Abstract

This article discusses historical criticism of revitalization the wali nanggroe position which is against the Law on Governing Aceh (UUPA). This article is written based on research using qualitative methods with a historical approach. The data used comes from a number of literature reviews related to the topic and interviews with several informants. This research proves that there was an error by the Acehnese elite in interpreting the position of wali nanggroe which was not known at all during the Sultanate of Aceh Darussalam. The figure of wali nanggroe has been revived without comprehensive historical research written to boost the popularity and support of the Acehnese people for the Free Aceh Movement (GAM). After the Helsinki MoU and the enactment of the UUPA, Acehnese elite groups associated with the Aceh Party (Partai Aceh) became sponsors of the Qanun No. 10, 2019 which gave the wali nanggroe excessive power, contravened the UUPA, and were not based on the facts of the Aceh Darussalam Sultanate which to be hailed.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Wali Nanggroe; Adat institution; GAM; Aceh Party; UUPA.

Funding: Mandiri

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Politik Ekonomi dan Identitas Budaya

Recent articles

Changes in Tolaki People Burial in Southeast Sulawesi: From Boat-Shaped Grave Coffin (Soronga) to Boat-Shaped Islamic Tomb (Koburu Bangga) Foreign Consortium Institution and the Economic Dependency of Indonesia during the New Order: From IGGI to CGI Lawatan Misi Kesenian Mangkunegaran ke Mancanegara 1989: Kontribusi bagi Pembangunan Nasional More recent articles

Most cited articles

Peranan Pemerintah dalam Pengembangan Wayang Orang Panggung Batak dan Bukan Batak: Paradigma Sosiohistoris tentang Konstruksi Identitas Etnik di Kota Medan, 1906-1939 Editorial Editorial Kearifan Sistem Religi Lokal dalam Mengintegrasikan Umat Hindu-Islam di Bali More cited articles

Abdullah, M. A. 2016. Kedudukan Wali Nanggroe Setelah Lahirnya Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(2), 279-287
Akbar, Arif 2019. Malik Mahmud Legal Strongmen?. LOGOS: Journal of Local Government Issues, 2(1), pp. 38-50. Retrieved from http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/LOGOS/article/view/7564
Al Mubarak 2009. Aceh Pungo. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing
Bushar, M. 2006. Asas-Asas Hukum Adat Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita
Ilhamsyah, F. 2018. Gagasan Politik Hasan Muhammad Di Tiro Tentang Nasionalisme Aceh. Jurnal Public Policy, 4(1), 14-23
Kartodirdjo, Sartono 1988. Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru 1500-1900: Dari Emperium sampai Imperium. Jakarta: Gramedia
Koentjaraningrat 2006. Pengantar Antropologi Indonesia. Jakarta: Rinneka
Noer, Deliar 1983. Ideologi Politik dan Pembangunan. Bandung: Yayasan Perkhimatan
Oesman, O. 1991. Pancasila sebagai Ideologi. Jakarta: BP7
Qanun Aceh No. 10 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Qanun Aceh No. 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Lembaga Wali Nanggroe
Samad, B. A. 2014. Kedudukan Wali Nanggroe di Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(1), 1-14
Undang Undang No. 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Otonomi Daerah
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pemerintahan Aceh
Sudirman 2009. Banda Aceh: Dalam Siklus Perdagangan Internasional 1500-1873. Banda Aceh: Balai Pelestarian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional
Sutrisno, Imam Hadi, Mas’ud, M & Aminah. 2015. Conflict and Assimilation (Case Study Javanese Among Achenese in Langsa 1955-2006. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(5), pp. 8-15. DOI: 10.9790/0837-20520815
Sutrisno, Imam Hadi. 2016. Case Study Role of Islamic Law in the Perspective of Sociological the Community Langsa. Quest Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4(9), pp. 69-78
Sutrisno, Imam Hadi 2019. Oreactualization Norma as a Reality in Law Eastern Coastal Area of Aceh: Case Study Role of Islamic Law in the Perspective of Sociological. Conference Paper in The 1st Multi-Discipinary International Conference University of Asahan 2019, Thema: The Role of Science in Development in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 Basic on Local Wisdom, in Sabty Garden Hotel-Kisaran North Sumatra, Macrh 23rd, 2019
Umar, Muhammad 2006. Peradaban Aceh (Tammadun)-Kilasan Sejarah Aceh dan Adat, Banda Aceh: Yayasan Busafat
Yusmar 1991. Psikologi Antropologi. Bandung: Rosdi Karya
Zentgraaff, H. C.1938. Aceh. Jakarta: Beuna

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-01-09 13:23:19

No citation recorded.

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Authors whose articles are published in Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha (JSCL) retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting a manuscript to JSCL, the author(s) agree to this policy. No separate documentation is required.
The author(s) guarantee that:

The article is original and written by the listed author(s),
It has not been previously published,
It does not contain statements that violate any laws, and
It does not infringe upon the rights of others.

The work is subject to copyright held by the author(s), is free of third-party rights, and all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained.
The author(s) retain the following rights to the published work, including but not limited to:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in their own future work, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for personal purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article in any repository, and
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article (e.g., posting it to institutional repositories or including it in a book), provided that its initial publication in JSCL is acknowledged.

If the article is co-authored, the submitting author confirms that all co-authors have agreed to the copyright and licensing terms and have been informed of this policy. JSCL is not responsible for any internal disputes between authors. All communication will be directed solely to the corresponding author.
Authors should also be aware that once published, their articles, and any accompanying files, such as datasets or analytical/computational materials, will be publicly accessible. These materials will be governed by the same Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JSCL allows users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under this license. Users must credit the author(s) and JSCL when distributing the work through journals or other publication media. Unless otherwise specified, the author(s) are considered public entities upon publication of the article.