skip to main content

Preventive and Evaluative Mechanism Analysis on Regulatory and Legislation Reform in Indonesia

*Ni Luh Gede Astariyani orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia
Bagus Hermanto orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia
Rosino da Cruz  -  Faculty of Law, Universidade Da Paz, Timor-Leste
Fifiana Wisnaeni orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The quality of regulatory and legislative measures, both within and outside the hierarchy in Indonesia, can be assessed using certain indicators. These indicators demonstrate a stagnation and a slight shift towards other legal issues. To improve the quality of regulatory and legislative measures, it is necessary to amend preventive and evaluative mechanisms. This condition provides a foundation for further analysis of all problems, with a focus on creating a positive system that prioritizes urgency and required improvements. This paper aims to analyze the preventive and evaluative mechanisms of legislation in Indonesia objectively. This article uses the doctrinal legal method, utilizing legal concepts, statutory laws, legal facts, and legal case approaches. It suggests amending the current mechanism and recommends reforms towards both preventive and evaluative mechanisms to improve regulatory and legislative quality in Indonesia. This study was concerned with formulating grounded principles and concepts, and providing proof of concept for preventive and evaluative mechanisms towards statutory laws, which would ensure the sustainability of Indonesia's legislative and regulatory reform.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Certificate of Proofreading
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (227KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Preventive; Evaluative; Indonesia; Regulatory and Legislation Reform

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdurahman, Ali., & Prasetianingsih, Rahayu. Haruskah Hierarki Peraturan Perundang - Undangan Dinormakan?. (2018). Jurnal Majelis; Media Aspirasi Konstitusi, Edisi 07/Juli,pp.37-48. https://www.mpr.go.id/peng kajian/JM_Edisi_07_Juli_2018.pdf
  2. Alamsyah., Suwitri, Sri., Kismartini., & Yuwanto. (2019). Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Understand the Process of Local Legislation in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review,Vol.3,(No.1),pp.34-47
  3. DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss1.136.pp34-47
  4. Althabhawi, Nabeel Mahdi., Zainol, Zinatul Ashiqin., & Bagherib, Parviz. (2022). Society 5.0: A New Challenge to Legal Norms, Sriwijaya Law Review, Vol. 6, (No.1), pp.41-54.DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1415.pp41-54
  5. Arsil, Fitra., Ayuni, Qurrata., & Ariesy, Tri Mauleny. (2022). The disappearance of the ‘legislative model': Indonesian parliament's experience in response to Covid-19. The Journal of Legislative Studies, in press, pp. 1-23.DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2022.2067948
  6. Arie, M. (2016). An Approach of Legisprudence Theory to Assess the Quality of Local Regulation. Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol.2, (No.3),pp.371-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v2i3.699
  7. Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede., Setyari, Ni Putu Wiwin., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2020). Regional Government Authority in Determining Policies on the Master: Plan of Tourism Development. Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Vol. 42, (No.3),pp.210-219. https://doi.org/10.24843/ KP.2020.v42.i03.p01
  8. Bielen, Samantha., Marneffe, Wim., & Popelier, Patricia. (2015). A Conceptual Framework on the Impact of Regulatory Quality on Litigation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation,Vol.3,(No.1),pp.23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2015.1041703
  9. Bisariyadi. (2016). Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol.2, (No.2), pp.225-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i2.306
  10. Butt, Simon. (2019a). The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse?. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 14, (No.1), pp. 147–74. DOI: 10.1017/asjcl.2018.19
  11. Butt, Simon (2019b). Judicial Reasoning and Review in the Indonesian Supreme Court. Asian Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 6, (No.1),pp. 67–97. DOI: 10.1017/als.2018.26
  12. Butt, Simon., & Murharjanti, Prayekti. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 20, (No. 1), pp. 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014
  13. Chen, Albert H.Y. (2010). Pathways of Western liberal constitutional development in Asia: A comparative study of five major nations. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol.8(No.4),pp.860-887. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor002
  14. Diprose, Rachael., McRae, Dave., & Hadiz, Vedi R. (2019). Two Decades of Reformasi in Indonesia: Its Illiberal Turn. Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol.49, (No.5), pp.691-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1637922
  15. Efendi, Ahmad M. (2018). An Overlapping Legislative Authority: Parliament Versus The Indonesian Constitutional Court. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,Vol.5,(No.1),pp.50-69. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n1.a3
  16. Fitryantica, A. (2019). Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia melalui Konsep Omnibus Law. Gema Keadilan, Vol.6,(No.3),pp.302-303. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.6.3.300-316
  17. Gaus, Nurdiana., Sultan., & Basri, Muhammad. (2017). State Bureaucracy in Indonesia and its Reforms: An Overview. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 40, (No.8),pp.658-669. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179
  18. Hermanto, B. (2018). Irawan Soejito tentang Teknik Membuat Undang-undang. Majalah Konstitusi, Vol. 141, Nomor 136, (Juni 2018),pp.62-63. https://www.mkri.id/public/ content/infoumum/majalahkonstitusi/pdf/Majalah_141_1.%20Edisi%20Juni%202018%20.pdf
  19. Hermanto, Bagus., & Aryani, Nyoman Mas. (2021). Omnibus Legislation as the Tool for Legislative Reform by Developing Countries: Indonesia, Turkey, and Serbia Practice, Theory and Practice of Legislation, Vol. 9, (No.3),pp.425-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2027162
  20. Hermanto, B. (2022). Refleksi terhadap Perubahan Undang-undang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Majalah Konstitusi Edisi Juni 2022, Vol. 212, Nomor 184,pp.8-10. https://www.mkri.id/public/ content/infoumum/majalahkonstitusi/pdf/Majalah_212_Majalah%20Edisi%20JUNI%202022.pdf
  21. Hermanto, B. (2023). Deliberate legislative reforms to improve the Legislation Quality in Developing Countries: Case of Indonesia. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 11(1),pp.1-31. DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2022.2080392
  22. Kuswanto. (2018). Consistency of the Presidential System in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, Vol.2,Issue2,pp.170-182.DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss2.67.pp170-182
  23. Mahy, P. (2022). Indonesia's Omnibus Law on Job Creation: Legal Hierarchy and Responses to Judicial Review in the Labour Cluster of Amendments. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, Vol.17, (No.1), pp.51–75. DOI: 10.1017/asjcl.2022.7
  24. Mariyam, Siti., Satria, Adhi Putra., & Suryoutomo, Markus. (2020). The Making of Law in Indonesia: A Criticism and Evaluation of The Practise of Legislative Function in The House of Representatives. Law Reform, Vol. 16,(No.2),pp.215-223. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33773
  25. Marwiyah, Siti., Borman, M. Syahrul., Ruba'ie., Ramadhani, M Chotib., Saraswati, Retno., & Naprathansuk, Non. (2023). The Educational Role of The Constitutional Court in Compliance of Indonesian Citizens. Law Reform,Vol.19,(No.1),pp.148-168, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.53971
  26. Mastenbroek, Ellen., van Voorst, Stijn., & Meuwese, Anne. (2016). Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta-evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy,Vol.23,(No.9),pp.1329-1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1076874
  27. Mietzner, M. (2010). Political Conflict Resolution and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol.10, No.3,pp.397–424. DOI: 10.1017/S1598240800003672
  28. Miladmahesi, Rosita., Setiadi, Wicipto., Sadiawati, Diani., & Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi (2023). The Possibility Of The Implementation Of Fast-Track Legislation In Indonesia. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.10, (No.1),pp.101-121. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n1.a6
  29. Mochtar, Zainal Arifin., & Rishan, Idul. (2022). Autocratic Legalism: the Making of Indonesian Omnibus Law. Yustisia, Vol. 11 (No.1),pp.29-41. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.59296
  30. Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin., Satriawan, Iwan., & Nur Islami, Muhammad. (2017). A Comparison of Constitutional Adjudication Institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, Vol.25, pp.85-95. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/ pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-S0538-2017
  31. Nurcholis, Chanif., & Kridasakti, Sri Wahyu. (2018). Reconstruction Of The Local Government Model Based On The Concept Of The Founding Fathers And The 1945 Constitution Juncto The 1945 Constitution Of The Republic Of Indonesia Towars Modern Local Government. Yustisia, Vol. 7 (No. 3), pp.534-568. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v7i3.24610
  32. Popelier, P. (2015). The role of courts in legislative policy diffusion and divergence. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, Vol.3,(No.3),pp.315-331. https://doi.org/10. 1080/20508840.2015.1131058
  33. Purwadi, Hari., Sulistiyono, Adi., & Firdausy, Adriana Grahani. (2015). Konsekuensi Transplantasi Hukum Terhadap Pancasila Sebagai Norma Dasar Dan Hukum Lokal, Yustisia,Vol.4,(No.1),pp.73-88, https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8622
  34. Baum, Jeeyang Rhee., & Bawn, Kathleen. (2011). Slowing at Sunset: Administrative Procedures and the Pace of Reform in Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol.11,(No.2),pp.197–222. DOI: 10.1017/S1598240800007165
  35. Izzati, Naybilla R. (2022). Deregulation in Job Creation Law: The Future of Indonesian Labor Law. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol. 9,(No.2), pp.191-209. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n2.a3%20
  36. Rogler, L. J. J. (2005). Recent Developments In Administrative Law In The Netherlands and the European Union. Indonesian Journal of International Law Vol.2, (No.2), pp. 319-332. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol2.2.7
  37. Rumiartha, I Nyoman Prabu Buana., Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede., & Indradewi, Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah. (2022). Human Rights of Indigenous People in Indonesia: A Constitutional Approach. Journal of East Asia & International Law, Vol.15 (No.2),pp. 395-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.14330/jeail. 2022.15.2.10
  38. Setiadi, W. (2018). The Urgency of Regulatory Reform in Order to Support Indonesia’s National Development. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal),Vol.7,(No.4),pp.418-434. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i04.p01
  39. Setiadi, W. (2019). Institutional Restructuring to Sustain Regulatory Reform in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol.5, (No.1),pp.120-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v5i1.1699
  40. Setiadi, W. (2021). Regulatory Reform in Support of Indonesia Advancement. Italienisch, Vol.11,Issue1,pp.83-117. https://doi.org/10.1115/italienisch.v11i1.83
  41. Suartha, I Dewa Made., Puspitosari, Hervina., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2020). Reconstruction Communal Rights Registration in encouraging Indonesia Environmental Protection. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, Vol.29, (No.3s),pp.1280-1282. https://www.academia.edu/download/62632756/6085-Article_Text-9426-1-10-2020031720200331-38760-dssodw.pdf
  42. Suartha, I Dewa Made., Martha, I Dewa Agung Gede Mahardika., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2021). Innovation based on Balinese Local Genius shifting Alternative Legal Concept: Towards Indonesia Development Acceleration. Journal of Legal, Ethical, and Regulatory Issues, Vol.24, (No.7), pp. 1-9, https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jnlolletl2424&div=20&id=&page=
  43. Suartha, I Dewa Made., Hattori, Mariko., Martha, I Dewa Agung Gede Mahardika., Hermanto, Bagus. & Dewi, Ni Putu Yeni Kusuma. (2023). Quo Vadis Corporate Crime Liability: Beyond Rule Reform and Future Prospect on Amending Criminal Code in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol.7, (No.2), pp.32-68. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.61989
  44. Subawa, Made. & Hermanto, Bagus. (2023). Despite Complicated Portraits and Policy Orientation: Struggle to Articulate Right to Education Based on the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decisions. Revista de Direito Internacional, Vol.20, (No.2), pp. 611-629. https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v20i2.9251
  45. van Lochem, P. (2017). Legislation against the rule of law – an introduction. The Theory, and Practice of Legislation, Vol.5, (No.2), pp. 95-100. DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2017.1387729
  46. van Voorst, Stijn., & Zwaan, Pieter. (2019). The (non-)use of expost legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.26, (No.3) pp. 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763. 2018.1449235
  47. Wasti, Ryan Muthiara., Sati, Nisrina Irbah., & Fatmawati. (2022). Law-making in the time of pandemic as a new state of emergency in Indonesia. The Journal of Legislative Studies, in-press, pp. 1-22, DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2022.2116836
  48. Widayati., Herawati, Ratna., & Winanto. (2023). The Urgency of Presidential Institution Regulations in Strengthening the Presidential Government System. Law Reform,Vol.19(No.2),pp.199-220. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i2.57880
  49. Wijaya, Mas Pungky Hendra., & Ali, Mohammad Zulfikar. (2021). Legislation Impediments in Reorganising Government Bodies in Indonesia. Bestuur, Vol.9, (No.1), pp.1-12, https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.51633
  50. Xanthaki, H. (2010). Drafting Manuals and Quality in Legislation: Positive Contribution towards Certainty in the Law or Impediment to the Necessity for Dynamism of Rules?. Legisprudence, Vol. 4, (No.2), pp. 111-128, https://doi.org/10.1080/17521467.2010.11424705
  51. Xanthaki, H. (2014). European Union Legislative Quality After the Lisbon Treaty: The Challenges of Smart Regulation. Statute Law Review, Vol.35, (No.1), pp.66–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmt005
  52. Xanthaki, H. (2018). An Enlightened Approach to Legislative Scrutiny: Focusing on Effectiveness. European Journal of Risk Regulation,Vol.9,(No.3),pp.431–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.25
  53. Yusa, I Gede., Hermanto, Bagus., & Ardani, Ni Ketut. (2021). Law Reform as the Part of National Resilience: Discovering Hindu and Pancasila Values in Indonesia’s Legal Development Plan. In Proceedings of the International Conference for Democracy and National Resilience (ICDNR 2021) Series: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, (pp.1-10). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211221.001
  54. Hermanto, B. (2019). Law Instruments within Disruptive World and Polarization of Culture. Discussant on the International Seminar Master of Law Disruptive Era in Law Development, Udayana University, 27 September 2019, pp.1-3
  55. Hermanto, B. (2021). Discover Future Prospect of Indonesia Criminal Law Reform: Questioning Adat Criminal Law existence, Material, and Formal Legislation, and Constitutional Court Decision Frameworks. Paper has presented at an International Seminar with the theme "Challenges in Reforming Indonesian Criminal Law" at Faculty of Law Udayana University 17 June 2021, pp.1-30
  56. Jacobs, S. (2008). Smart Regulation For Markets: the Vision of Regulatory Reform, Regulatory Reform and Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). Training Course for Indonesia Stakeholders in Civil Society, December 8-12, 2008. Washington DC
  57. Kim, Jong S. (2000). Regulatory Reform In Korea: Visions and Strategies for Better Governance”. Paper presented at OECD high-level seminar on Partnerships in Governance: Common Responses to Challenges of Globalization, 9-10 May 2000, Paris, France
  58. Kim, J. (2016). Economic Effect of Regulatory Reforms in Korea. Research Report. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200937/1/kdi-pol-study-2016-01.pdf
  59. Monoarfa, S. (2020). Perubahan Undang-Undang Bidang Tata Ruang, Lingkungan Hidup dan RUU Ibukota Baru”, disampaikan dalam Rapat Dengar Pendapat Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia dengan Kementerian Agraria/Badan Pertanahan Nasional dan Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional pada 19 Februari 2020
  60. Sarjana, I Made. (2023). Intervensi Negara ke dalam Kontrak Komersial (Prinsip CETIHK). Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum Universitas Udayana, 25 November 2023
  61. Schou-Zibell, Lotte., & Madhur, Srinivasa. (2010). “egulatory Reforms for Improving the Business Environment in Selected Asian Economies— How Monitoring and Comparative Benchmarking Can Provide Incentive for Reform. The ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration,No.40,pp.1-32. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28514/wp40-regulatory-reforms.pdf
  62. Suyatna, I Nyoman. (2022). Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Yang Baik Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum Administrasi Negara pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Sabtu, 3 September 2022
  63. Yusa, I Gede., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2022). Dasar Alternatif Penataan Mekanisme Preventif Dan Evaluatif: Komparasi Dan Usulan Rekomendatif Dalam Akselerasi Peningkatan Kualitas Legislasi Dan Regulasi Nasional. Makalah dalam Konferensi Nasional APHTN-HAN 2022, di Hotel Aryaduta, Nusa Dua, Bali, pada 20 Mei 2022, pp.1-20
  64. Yusa, I Gede. (2021). Merancang Undang-Undang Kepresidenan yang Bersumber pada Hukum Ketatanegaraan Majapahit. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Sabtu, 27 Maret 2021
  65. Astariyani, Ni Luh G. (2017). Delegasi Pengaturan Kepada Peraturan Gubernur Menjamin Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan. Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Udayana
  66. Cormacain, R. (2017). Legislative Drafting and the Rule of Law. Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. School of Advanced Study, University of London
  67. Astomo, P. (2018). Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia, First Edition. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada
  68. Atmaja, Gede Marhaendra Wija., Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede., Aryani, Nyoman Mas., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2022). Hukum Kebijakan Publik. Denpasar: Swasta Nulus
  69. Direktorat Analisa Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Kedeputian Bidang Politik, Hukum, Pertahanan dan Keamanan – Bappenas. (2011). Konsep Pedoman Penerapan Reformasi Regulasi. Jakarta: Bappenas RI
  70. Lee, Joosun., & Han, Sunok. (1999). Evaluation of Deregulation Results of the Kim Young Sam Administration. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute
  71. MPR RI. (2020a). Panduan Pemasyarakatan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan Ketetapan MPR RI, Revised Edition. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR-RI
  72. MPR RI.(2020b). Bahan Sosialisasi Empat Pilar MPR RI, Tenth Edition. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI
  73. OECD. (2000). Regulatory Reform in Korea. Paris: OECD
  74. OECD. (2017). Regulatory Policy in Korea: Towards Better Regulation, OECD Reviews of Regulatory Reform. Paris: OECD Publishing
  75. PSHK. (2019). Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia: Prosiding Forum Akademik Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi 2019. Jakarta: PSHK cooperate with Netherlands Government under Rule of Law Fund and International Development Law Organization
  76. Subawa, Made., Giri, Ni Putu Niti Suari., & Hermanto, Bagus. (2023). Dinamika Filsafat Ilmu Hukum Pancasila: Ontologi dan Aksiologis Sumber dari Segala Sumber Hukum di Indonesia, First Edition. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia
  77. World Bank. (2008). Regulatory Transformation in the Republic of Korea: Case Studies on Reform Implementation Experience. Washington DC: FIAS cooperated with IFC, MIGA, and the World Bank
  78. Yusa, I Gede. (2016). Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Perubahan UUD NRI 1945, First Edition. Malang: Setara Press
  79. The 1945 Indonesia Constitution
  80. The Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Statutory Laws Arrangement as being amended firstly under the Law Number 15 of 2019 and the Law Number 13 of 2022 (Indonesia)
  81. The Basic Act on Administrative Regulation (BAAR), ( Law No. 13329 Year 1997, South Korea)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-06-15 15:28:00

No citation recorded.