BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LR58639, author = {Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan and Desak Putu Dewi Kasih and Putu Aras Samsithawrati and Putri Triari Dwijayanthi and Made Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain and Mirah Mahaswari and Made Grazia Ustriyana and Robert Vaisile Moisa}, title = {Quo Vadis Traditional Cultural Expressions Protection: Threats from Personal Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence}, journal = {LAW REFORM}, volume = {19}, number = {2}, year = {2024}, keywords = {Countervailing Measures; Threats; Traditional Cultural Expressions}, abstract = { Legal certainty for Communal Intellectual Property protection on the inventory and record-keeping arrangements in terms of ownership proof in Indonesia, has increasingly been regulated in various regulations. However, threats are also growing. Traditional Cultural expression works are easily turned into personal video works. Along with that, such works are also vulnerable as those are easily threatened by Artificial intelligence’s ability to express works made from previous works of art such as paintings. This article aims to analyze Traditional Cultural Expressions protection which are transformed or adapted into personal works or works made by Artificial Intelligence and the measures to overcome these threats. The results show that referring to Government Regulation 56/2022, the commercial use of Traditional Cultural Expressions works both in the form of adaptation and transformation by individual humans and Artificial Intelligence is required to obtain a permit and pay attention to the distribution of benefits which will further be determined by the Minister. However, regulations on this mechanism has not been explicitly regulated. Measures to overcome threats can be made through measures to turn threats into opportunities and strengths. It is also relevant to prioritize countervailing measures, namely by following the pattern of threats as a balancing act. }, issn = {2580-8508}, pages = {321--343} doi = {10.14710/lr.v19i2.58639}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/lawreform/article/view/58639} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Legal certainty for Communal Intellectual Property protection on the inventory and record-keeping arrangements in terms of ownership proof in Indonesia, has increasingly been regulated in various regulations. However, threats are also growing. Traditional Cultural expression works are easily turned into personal video works. Along with that, such works are also vulnerable as those are easily threatened by Artificial intelligence’s ability to express works made from previous works of art such as paintings. This article aims to analyze Traditional Cultural Expressions protection which are transformed or adapted into personal works or works made by Artificial Intelligence and the measures to overcome these threats. The results show that referring to Government Regulation 56/2022, the commercial use of Traditional Cultural Expressions works both in the form of adaptation and transformation by individual humans and Artificial Intelligence is required to obtain a permit and pay attention to the distribution of benefits which will further be determined by the Minister. However, regulations on this mechanism has not been explicitly regulated. Measures to overcome threats can be made through measures to turn threats into opportunities and strengths. It is also relevant to prioritize countervailing measures, namely by following the pattern of threats as a balancing act.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Boosting and Protecting Balinese Communal Intellectual Property in Digital Tourism: Why We Need Practical Guideline?
Biopiracy and the Regulatory Framework for Material Transfer Agreements in Indonesia
Legal Issues of Artificial Intelligence – Generated Works: Challenges on Indonesian Copyright Law
Guidelines for Implementing Imprisonment Sentences with Single Formulation (A Critique of Book I of the National Criminal Code)
Last update: 2024-12-26 17:23:05
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Law Reform and Master Program of Law, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Law Reform and Master Program of Law, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Law Reform journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Law Reform]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document or fax :
Dr. Kholis Roisah, S.H., M.Hum (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Law Reform
Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Imam Bardjo, SH No.1, Semarang, Indonesia 50241
Telp. (024) 8313493
Email: jurnalmih.undip@gmail.com
Has been indexed in:
Statistics
LAW REFORM (p-ISSN:1858-4810, e-ISSN:2580-8508) is published by Master Program of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.