DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v19i2.290-302

Green Building Assessment of Cilacap State Polytechnic: Building A

*Vicky Prasetia  -  Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia
Theresia Evila Purwanti Sri Rahayu  -  Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia
Roy Aries Permana Tarigan  -  Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Buildings to achieve sustainable development must meet environmental criteria. This environmentally friendly building design is often referred to as a green building. The Green Building concept aims to reduce the negative impact on the environment from the construction and utilization of buildings. This study will discuss the criteria and requirements that must be met by company buildings to be categorized as Green Buildings according to the Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) and obtain a Greenship certificate, as well as any components at the construction and maintenance stage that affect the fulfillment of these requirements. This study uses a quantitative method by the green ship standard version 1.1. The greens criteria assessment in Building A resulted in 51 points. The results of this assessment explain that Building A is included in the silver category. This result explains that 44% of Building A's facilities have met the green building criteria. Upgrading from silver to gold category needs to increase 7 points by adding facilities, standard operating procedures, and policies.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
GREEN BUILDING ASSESSMENT OF BUILDING A CILACAP STATE POLYTECHNIC
Subject
Type Other
  Download (190KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Assessment; greenship; silver category
Funding: Cilacap State Polytechnic

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Regional Case Study
Language : EN
Recent articles
Adsorption of Dyes Using Graphene Oxide-Based Nano-Adsorbent: A Review Constructed Wetlands for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage: A Review Assessing Occupational Noise Exposure and Blood Pressure of Cabin Personnel of an Indonesian Diesel Train Environmental Performance with Firm Size as an Intervening Variable Analysis of Potential RDF Resources from MSW Landfills in Major Cities of Indonesia Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies in the Transportation and Solid Waste Sector in Cilacap Regency Green Building Assessment of Cilacap State Polytechnic: Building A The Use of Qual2KW to Analyze the Concentration of pH, Nitrate, Phosphate, and Fecal Coliform on Water Quality: A Case Study of the Klampok River, Semarang Regency More recent articles
Most cited articles
DAMPAK PENURUNAN TANAH DAN KENAIKAN MUKA LAUT TERHADAP LUASAN GENANGAN ROB DI SEMARANG EVALUASI KINERJA INSTALASI PENGOLAHAN AIR MINUM (IPAM) KARANGPILANG I PDAM SURYA SEMBADA KOTA SURABAYA SECARA KUANTITATIF KONSERVASI ENERGI BERBASIS RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY DENGAN PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI MICROBIAL PENENTUAN CAMPURAN LUMPUR LAPINDO SEBAGAI SUBSTITUSI PASIR DAN SEMEN DALAM PEMBUATAN PAVING BLOCK RAMAH LINGKUNGAN EVALUATION ON COMMUNITY BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION IN RANDUBLATUNG, BLORA More cited articles
  1. Al-Yasiri, Q. and Géczi, G., 2021. Global warming potential: causes and consequences. Academia Letters
  2. Allen, J. G., 2016. The 9 foundations of a healthy building
  3. Allen, J. G., 2022. Healthy buildings
  4. Anastasia, N., 2016. The way to encourage green building in Indonesia
  5. Anonymus., 2021. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 tentang Bangunan Gedung. Peraturan Pemerintah 087169, 406
  6. Arafah D., Maranatha W., Sutanto H., 2021. Analisis kriteria bangunan hijau berdasarkan greenship homes v.1.0 pada perumahan di Kota Malang. Infomanpro 10(2), 19–26
  7. Ardhiansyah, I., Azizah, R., 2020. Pengukuran greenship new building ver. 1.2 pada bangunan baru rumah atsiri Indonesia (final assessment). Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur 15(2), 79–86
  8. Berawi, M. A. et al., 2019. Stakeholders perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia. Heliyon 5(3), e01328
  9. Britannica, T. E., 2020. Structural system, encyclopedia britannica
  10. Busono, T. et al., 2021. Implementation of the greenship rating tools in the centre of excellent (CoE) building at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 738(1),012040
  11. Chan, L., 2010. Selection of hotels: Is the sustainability of a building more important than its aesthetic appearance? Oregon State University
  12. Churchill, A., 2020. The gardens of eden: new residential garden concepts and architecture for a greener planet. Gestalten
  13. Dewa K. S., Kadek D. H., Merry. K., 2020. Analisis penerapan greenship existing building versi 1.1 pada bangunan gedung Umalas Hotel dan Residence. A Scientific Journal Of Civil Engineering 24(2), 161–167
  14. Eco-Friendly Building Explained & 5 Mind-Blowing Examples. 2022
  15. Febrina, F., Maulina, F., 2020. Penilaian kriteria green building pada gedung Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh menggunakan peringkat penilaian greenship rating tools for new building versi 1.2. Journal of The Civil Engineering Student 2(1), 78–84
  16. INDONESIA, G. B. C., 2011. Greenship existing building
  17. Karuniastuti, N., 2015. Bangunan ramah lingkungan. Swara Patra 5(1), 8–15
  18. Kurniawan, B. et al., 2020. Analisis komponen konstruksi pada penerapan persyaratan green building menurut konsil green building Indonesia (GBCI). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil 2020, 320–326
  19. Mahmoud, S., Zayed, T., Fahmy, M., 2019. Development of sustainability assessment tool for existing buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society 44, 99–119
  20. Mako, P. D. V., 2013. Aesthetic premises of green design: ethics and sustainable architecture. in 13th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM 2013. Albena, Bulgaria: Semantic Scholar
  21. Matilda Annerstedt et. al., 2012. Green qualities in the neighbourhood and mental health – results from a longitudinal cohort study in Southern Sweden. BMC Public Health 12, 337
  22. Muhammad F. A., Fadhil P. N., Darman F. S., 2021. Evaluasi penerapan kriteria green and smart building pada proyek pembangunan gedung kantor Pt. Inalum (persero). Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Agregat 1(1), 23–32
  23. Puiu, T., 2022. What are the pros and cons of solar energy? here’s everything you need to know
  24. Putra, R. M., Wibowo, M. A., Syafrudin, S., 2020. Aplikasi green building berdasarkan metode edge. Wahana Teknik Sipil: Jurnal Pengembangan Teknik Sipil 25(2), 98
  25. Question Of The Week: What Is A High Performance Building? 2016
  26. Rakyat, K. P. U., 2018. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 27/PRT/M/2018 tentang Sertifikat Laik Fungsi Bangunan Gedung. 7(5), 1–2
  27. Roshaunda, D. et al., 2019. Penilaian Kriteria green building pada bangunan gedung Universitas Pembangunan Jaya berdasarkan indikasi green building council Indonesia. Widyakala Journal 6, 29
  28. Saka, N., Olanipekun, A. O., Omotayo, T., 2021. Reward and compensation incentives for enhancing green building construction. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 11, 100138
  29. Samosir, D. K. B. M. T., 2020. Green building assesment in shopping building. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research 20(01), 8240
  30. Sanchez, A., 2022. Minimalist haven above the sunset strip
  31. Srinivas, H., 2015. What is a green or sustainable building?
  32. Sudarwani, M. M., 2013. Penerapan green architecture dan green building sebagai upaya pencapaian sustainable architecture. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  33. Vafadar, M., 2019. Mental health and green architecture. International Jurnal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies 6(8), 70–72
  34. Wang, N., Adeli, H., 2014. Sustainable building design. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 20(1), 1–10
  35. Widyawati, R. L., 2018. Green building dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan konsep hemat energi menuju green building di Jakarta. Karya Lintas Ilmu Bidang Rekayasa Arsitektur, Sipil, Industri, 13, 01–17
  36. Yüksek, I., Karadayi, T. T., 2017. Energy-efficient building design in the context of building life cycle. Energy Efficient Buildings 10, 93-123

Last update:

  1. Green Building Assessment: A Case Study of Integrated Laboratory Building Diponegoro University Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing No. 21 of 2021

    J U D Hatmoko, L I Sari. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1414 (1), 2024. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1414/1/012059

Last update: 2024-12-25 03:15:05

No citation recorded.