skip to main content

Wastewater Removal Pollutants Using Polyethylene terephthalate Media : Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

*Muliyadi Muliyadi orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Purwanto Purwanto orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Sri Sumiyati orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Budiyono Budiyono orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Sudarno Sudarno orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Budi Warsito orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The aim was to analyze the rate of degradation kinetics in anaerobic MBBR reactors for biological wastewater treatment. we examined three factors: the BOD, COD, and TSS. Domestic wastewater was used in this study. The reactor measured 40 × 40 × 50 cm and had a thickness of 4 mm. The construction was performed using glass. The operation lasted for 30 days. Microorganisms grow and reproduced on the surface of the plastic bottle cap media during the anaerobic bioreactor seeding process by adding as many local microorganisms as 1.5/50 liters of wastewater. Domestic wastewater used as an inlet source for wastewater treatment has BOD, COD, TSS, Ammonia, and Fat contents that do not meet the requirements and exceed the set threshold value. The BOD/COD ratio was 0.55. SEM measurements revealed a visible bacterial biofilm on the media surface, consisting of five steps: aggregation, growth, division, maturation, and spreading. After acclimatization, the biofilm was fully developed, effectively removing organic contaminants and producing fungal polysaccharides. The study of substrate concentration and degradation kinetics in anaerobic reactors is crucial for system design and operation, emphasizing the need for substrate optimization to enhance microbial activity.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Anaerobic; Degradation Kinetics; Wastewater; Pollutants; MBBR
Funding: Ministry of Health (Poltekkes Kemenkes Ternate) (Funding Number: HK.01.07/F/ 1953.)

Article Metrics:

  1. Al Hosani, N., Fathelrahman, E., Ahmed, H., Rikab, E., 2022. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) for Decentralized Grey Water Treatment: Technical, Ecological and Cost Efficiency Comparison for Domestic Applications. Emir J Food Agric 34, 731–742
  2. Ali Ch. Bader, Hayfaa J. Hussein, Mushtak T.Jabar, 2022. BOD: COD Ratio as Indicator for Wastewater and Industrial Water Pollution. Int J Spec Educ 37, 2164–2171
  3. Angon, P.B., Islam, Md.S., KC, S., Das, A., Anjum, N., Poudel, A., Suchi, S.A., 2024. Sources, effects and present perspectives of heavy metals contamination: Soil, plants and human food chain. Heliyon 10, e28357
  4. Cai, W., Zhao, M., Kong, J., Riggio, S., Finnigan, T., Stuckey, D., Guo, M., 2021. Linkage of community composition and function over short response time in anaerobic digestion systems with food fermentation wastewater. iScience 24, 1–13
  5. Ćetković, J., Knežević, M., Vujadinović, R., Tombarević, E., Grujić, M., 2023. Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Water (Basel) 15, 1645
  6. Chen, Q., Lønborg, C., Chen, F., Gonsior, M., Li, Y., Cai, R., He, C., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Shi, Q., Jiao, N., Zheng, Q., 2022. Increased microbial and substrate complexity result in higher molecular diversity of the dissolved organic matter pool. Limnol Oceanogr 67, 2360–2373
  7. Darwin, Diana, N., Mardhotillah, Pratama, A., 2021. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Manure and Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME): Assessment of Methane Production and Biodegradation Efficiency. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 16, 671–676
  8. Dassanayake, R.P., Falkenberg, S.M., Stasko, J.A., Shircliff, A.L., Lippolis, J.D., Briggs, R.E., 2020. Identification of a reliable fixative solution to preserve the complex architecture of bacterial biofilms for scanning electron microscopy evaluation. PLoS One 15, 1–15
  9. Dottorini, G., Michaelsen, T.Y., Kucheryavskiy, S., Andersen, K.S., Kristensen, J.M., Peces, M., Wagner, D.S., Nierychlo, M., Nielsen, P.H., 2021. Mass-immigration determines the assembly of activated sludge microbial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 1–11
  10. Duran‐Cruz, V., Hernández, S., Ortíz, I., 2024. Propionic acid production by Propionibacterium acidipropionici CDBB‐B‐1981 from enzymatic hydrolysates of Agave bagasse pretreated by steam explosion. Engineering Reports 6, 1–14
  11. Gagliano, M.C., Ismail, S.B., Stams, A.J.M., Plugge, C.M., Temmink, H., Van Lier, J.B., 2017. Biofilm formation and granule properties in anaerobic digestion at high salinity. Water Res 121, 61–71
  12. González, D., Gabriel, D., Sánchez, A., 2022. Odors Emitted from Biological Waste and Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Mini-Review. Atmosphere (Basel) 13, 798
  13. Han, J., Lei, L., Cai, F., Li, Y., 2020. Treatment of UASB-treated recycled paper wastewater using SBR and SBBR: A comparison. Bioresources 15, 3473–3486
  14. Hudayah, N., Krainara, S., Kongduan, V., Chaiprasert, P., Suraraksa, B., 2021. Efficiencies of anaerobic hybrid and UASB reactors to alleviate the adverse effect of elevated salinity in wastewater. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 96, 3426–3435
  15. Jia, Y., Wilkins, D., Lu, H., Cai, M., Lee, P.K.H., 2016. Long-Term Enrichment on Cellulose or Xylan Causes Functional and Taxonomic Convergence of Microbial Communities from Anaerobic Digesters. Appl Environ Microbiol 82, 1519–1529
  16. Kawan, J.A., Suja’, F., Pramanik, S.K., Yusof, A., Abdul Rahman, R., Abu Hasan, H., 2022. Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on the Performance of a Compact Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor for Effluent Polishing of Treated Sewage. Water (Basel) 14, 1–18
  17. Khadaroo, S.N.B.A., Grassia, P., Gouwanda, D., Poh, P.E., 2020. The influence of different solid-liquid ratios on the thermophilic anaerobic digestion performance of palm oil mill effluent (POME). J Environ Manage 257, 1–12
  18. Khafipour, A., Jordaan, E.M., Flores-Orozco, D., Khafipour, E., Levin, D.B., Sparling, R., Cicek, N., 2020. Response of Microbial Community to Induced Failure of Anaerobic Digesters Through Overloading With Propionic Acid Followed by Process Recovery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8, 1–15
  19. Khan, M.T., Krümpel, J., Wüst, D., Lemmer, A., 2021. Anaerobic Degradation of Individual Components from 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Process-Wastewater in Continuously Operated Fixed Bed Reactors. Processes 9, 677
  20. Khatoon, N., Naz, I., Ali, M.I., Ali, N., Jamal, A., Hameed, A., Ahmed, S., 2014. Bacterial succession and degradative changes by biofilm on plastic medium for wastewater treatment. J Basic Microbiol 54, 739–749
  21. Komolafe, O., Mrozik, W., Dolfing, J., Acharya, K., Vassalle, L., Mota, C.R., Davenport, R., 2021. Fate of four Different Classes of Chemicals Under Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions in Biological Wastewater Treatment. Front Environ Sci 9
  22. Lyu, X., Nuhu, M., Candry, P., Wolfanger, J., Betenbaugh, M., Saldivar, A., Zuniga, C., Wang, Y., Shrestha, S., 2024. Top-down and bottom-up microbiome engineering approaches to enable biomanufacturing from waste biomass. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 51, 1–17
  23. Mani, S., Sundaram, J., Das, K.C., 2016. Process simulation and modeling: Anaerobic digestion of complex organic matter. Biomass Bioenergy 93, 158–167
  24. Manzano-Gómez, L.A., Rincón-Rosales, R., Flores-Felix, J.D., Gen-Jimenez, A., Ruíz-Valdiviezo, V.M., Ventura-Canseco, L.M.C., Rincón-Molina, F.A., Villalobos-Maldonado, J.J., Rincón-Molina, C.I., 2023. Cost-Effective Cultivation of Native PGPB Sinorhizobium Strains in a Homemade Bioreactor for Enhanced Plant Growth. Bioengineering 10, 1–16
  25. Mathur, R., Sharma, M.K., Loganathan, K., Abbas, M., Hussain, S., Kataria, G., Alqahtani, M.S., Srinivas Rao, K., 2024. Modeling of two-stage anaerobic onsite wastewater sanitation system to predict effluent soluble chemical oxygen demand through machine learning. Sci Rep 14, 1835
  26. Naphtali, J., Chan, A.W.Y., Saleem, F., Li, E., Devries, J., Schellhorn, H.E., 2022. Comparative Metagenomics of Anaerobic Digester Communities Reveals Sulfidogenic and Methanogenic Microbial Subgroups in Conventional and Plug Flow Residential Septic Tank Systems. Processes 10, 1–12
  27. Papciak, D., Domoń, A., Zdeb, M., Tchórzewska-Cieślak, B., Konkol, J., Sočo, E., 2022. Mechanism of Biofilm Formation on Installation Materials and Its Impact on the Quality of Tap Water. Water (Basel) 14, 2401
  28. Paul, D., Hall, S.G., 2021. Biochar and zeolite as alternative biofilter media for denitrification of aquaculture effluents. Water (Switzerland) 13, 1–13
  29. Proano-Pena, G., Carrano, A.L., Blersch, D.M., 2020. Analysis of very-high surface area 3D-printed media in a moving bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment. PLoS One 15, 1–17
  30. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, C., Ospina-Betancourth, C., Sanabria, J., 2021. High Resistance of a Sludge Enriched with Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria to Ammonium Salts and Its Potential as a Biofertilizer. Bioengineering 8, 1–13
  31. Shahzad, H.M.A., Khan, S.J., Habib, Z., 2022. Performance evaluation and substrate removal kinetics in a thermophilic anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor for starch degradation. Water Pract Technol 17, 157–166
  32. Singh, B.J., Chakraborty, A., Sehgal, R., 2023. A systematic review of industrial wastewater management: Evaluating challenges and enablers. J Environ Manage 348, 119230
  33. Su, H., Yan, X., Zhao, Q., Liao, C., Tian, L., Wang, Z., Wan, Y., Li, N., Wang, X., 2023. Layered Design of a Highly Repeatable Electroactive Biofilm for a Standardized Biochemical Oxygen Demand Sensor. ACS Sens 8, 2383–2390
  34. Subroto, M., Prayogo, W., Soewondo, P., Setiyawan, A.S., 2022. Organic removal in domestic wastewater using anaerobic treatment system-mbbr with flow recirculation ratio and intermittent aeration. Indonesian journal of urban and environmental technology 5, 296–316
  35. Sun, D.G., Huang, B., Zuo, W.G., Zhao, H.Y., Wei, W., Deng, J., 2013. Kinetic Models of Hydrogen Production Process by Batch Anaerobic Fermentation from Contained Sugar Wastewater. Adv Mat Res 634–638, 981–986
  36. Vanwonterghem, I., Jensen, P.D., Rabaey, K., Tyson, G.W., 2016. Genome‐centric resolution of microbial diversity, metabolism and interactions in anaerobic digestion. Environ Microbiol 18, 3144–3158
  37. Waqas, U., Farhan, A., Haider, A., Qumar, U., Raza, A., 2023. Advancements in biofilm formation and control in potable water distribution systems: A comprehensive review and analysis of chloramine decay in water systems. J Environ Chem Eng 11, 111377
  38. Yin, F. Bin, Li, Z.F., Hou, S., Feng, R., Zhou, W., Wang, X.M., Guo, H., 2014. The Influence of Total Solid and Inoculum Ratio on Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge. Adv Mat Res 878, 670–678
  39. Zhao, A., Sun, J., Liu, Y., 2023. Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13
  40. Zheng, Y., Song, H., Chen, Q., Hou, Y., Zhang, X., Han, S., 2024. Comparing biofilm reactors inoculated with Shewanella for decolorization of Reactive Black 5 using different carrier materials. Biotechnol J 19, 1–12
  41. Zhu, P., Shen, Y., Pan, X., Dong, B., Zhou, J., Zhang, W., Li, X., 2021. Reducing odor emissions from feces aerobic composting: additives. RSC Adv 11, 15977–15988
  42. Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., 2021. Microwave Radiation Influence on Dairy Waste Anaerobic Digestion in a Multi-Section Hybrid Anaerobic Reactor (M-SHAR). Processes 9, 1–12

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-23 17:52:03

No citation recorded.