DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.4.2.125-130

Gasification of ‘Loose’ Groundnut Shells in a Throathless Downdraft Gasifier

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State,, Niger

2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Niger

Published: 15 Jul 2015.
Editor(s):

Citation Format:
Abstract
In this paper, gasification potential of biomass residue was investigated using a laboratory scale throatless downdraft gasifier. Experimental results of groundnut shell was gasified in the throatless downdraft gasifier to produce a clean gas with a calorific value of around 5.92 MJ/Nm3 and a combustible fraction of 45% v/v. Low moisture (8.6%) and ash content (3.19%) are the main advantages of groundnut shells for gasification. It is suggested that gasification of shell waste products is a clean energy alternative to fossil fuels. The product gas can be used efficiently for heating and possible usage in internal combustion engines.
Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Performance Evaluation of the Effect of waste paper on Groundnut Shell Briquette Gasification of ‘Loose’ Groundnut Shells in a Throathless Downdraft Gasifier Optimal Cost of a Solar Photovoltaic System for a Remote House in Bihar More recent articles
Most cited articles
Generating Organic Liquid Products from Catalytic Cracking of Used Cooking Oil over Mechanically Mixed Catalysts Evaluation of Energy Use in Public Housing in Lagos, Nigeria: Prospects for Renewable Energy Sources Potential Effect and Analysis of High Residential Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems Penetration to an Electric Distribution Utility (DU) Numerical Study of Effect of Blade Twist Modifications on the Aerodynamic Performance of Wind Turbine A Reliability Based Model for Wind Turbine Selection More cited articles
  1. Akay, G., M. Dogru, O. F. Calkan, and B. Calkan., (2005). Biofuels for fuel cells: Renewable energy from biomass fermentation. London: IWA
  2. ASABE Standards. 2007. S269.4. Cubes, pellets and crumbles - Definitions and methods for determining density, durability and moisture content. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE
  3. ASTM, 1994. E1755-01. Standard method for ash in biomass (Laboratory Analytical Procedure #005 of NREL): In Standard Biomass Analytical Methods. NREL
  4. ASTM, 2002. D 3175-89a, 1989. Standard test method for volatile matter in the analysis sample of coal and coke. 232-234
  5. Balat, M., and A. Gunhan., (2005). Biomass Energy in the World, Use of Biomass and Potential Trends.Energy Sources 27 (10): 931–940
  6. Bapat, D.W., Kulkarni S.V., Bhandarkar V.P., (1997). Design and operating experience on fluidized bed boiler burning biomass fuels with high alkali ash, In: Preto FDS, editor, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Vancouver, New York, NY: ASME, pp 165–174
  7. Bridgwater A.V., (2003). Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing. Chem Eng J; 91:87-102
  8. Buekens AG, Schoeters JG., (1985). Modeling of biomass gasification. Brussels: VUB
  9. Dogru, M., C. R. Howarth, G. Akay, B. Keskinler, and A. A. Malik., (2002). Gasification of hazelnut shells in a downdraft gasifier. Energy 27 (5): 415–427
  10. Freeman, H.A., Nigam S.N, Kelly, T.G., Ntare, B.R., Subrahmanyam, P and Boughton, D., (1999). The World Groundnut Economy, Facts, Trends and Outlook. Patancheru 502324, Andra Pradesh, India: Information Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics 52pp. ISBN 92-9066-404-5
  11. Hall., D.O., Rosillo-Calle F, de Groot P., (1992). Biomass energy lessons from case studies in developing countries. Energy Policy, pp 62–73
  12. Hall, D.O., Rosillo-Calle F., Woods, J., (1991). Biomass, its importance in balancing CO2 budgets. In: Grassi G, Collina A, Zibetta H, editors. Biomass for energy, industry and environment, 6th E.C. Conference, London: Elsevier Science, pp 89–96
  13. Jain, A.K., Goss, J.R., (2000). Determination of reactor scaling factors for throatless rice husk gasifier, Biomass and Bioenergy 18 249-256
  14. Mamphweli NS, Meyer EL., (2009). Implementation of the biomass gasification project for community empowerment at Melani village, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Renewable Energy; 34:2923-7
  15. McGowan F., (1991). Controlling the greenhouse effect: the role of renewable, Energy Policy, pp 111–118
  16. Midilli, A., M. Dogru, G. Akay, and Howarth, C.R., (2001) Hydrogen Production from Sewage Sludge via a Fixed bed Gasifier Product Gas. International Journal Hydrogen Energy 27 (10):1035–1041
  17. Mohod A.G., Khandetod Y.P., Powar A.G., (2008). Processed cashew shell waste as fuel supplement for heat generation. Energy Sustain Dev; 12:73–6
  18. Singh R.N., Jena U, Patel J.B., (2006). Sharma AM. Feasibility study of cashew nut shells as an open core gasifier feedstock. Renewable Energy; 31:481–7
  19. Tippayawong N, Chaichana C, Swe M.L., (2009). Distributed electricity generation from biomass gasification as a sustainable energy option for rural Myanmar. Int J Distrib Energy Resour; 5:71 –82
  20. Tippayawong, N., Chaichana, A., Promwangkwa, A., Rerkkriangkrai, P., (2011). Gasification of cashew nut shells for thermal application in local food processing factory. Energy Sustain Dev; 15:69-72
  21. Varshney R., Bhagoria.J.L., Mehta.C.R,, (2011) . Experimental investigation on a biomass briquette based throatless downdraft gasifier, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Dindigul, Volume 2, No 2
  22. Werther, J., Saenger, M., Hartge, E.U., Ogada, T., Siagi, Z., (2000) Combustion of agricultural residues, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 26, pp 1–27

Last update:

  1. An Assessment of Potential Resources for Biomass Energy in Nigeria

    Simeon Olatayo Jekayinfa, Joseph Ifeolu Orisaleye, Ralf Pecenka. Resources, 9 (8), 2020. doi: 10.3390/resources9080092

  2. ENERGY RECOVERY FROM ANIMAL MANURE: BIOGAS POTENTIAL OF BURDUR, TURKEY

    Zuhal Akyürek. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology-A Applied Sciences and Engineering, 2019. doi: 10.18038/aubtda.456873

  3. Effect of Compression Ratio on Performance and Emission Characteristics of Dual Spark Plug Ignition Engine Fueled With n-Butanol as Additive Fuel

    Ravikumar Ramegouda, Antony Alappath Joseph. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10 (1), 2021. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2021.32364

  4. Modelling and simulation of a Single Cyclone for Optimal Efficiency for a Batch-Type Fixed-Bed Down-Draft Gasifier using CFD

    S. J. Aliyu, E. L. Kucha, S. J. Ibrahim. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1107 (1), 2021. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1107/1/012038

  5. Spent tea waste as a biomass for co-gasification enhances the performance of semi-industrial gasifier working on groundnut shell

    Anjan Augustine M, Christus Jeya Singh V, Joseph Sekhar S. Biomass and Bioenergy, 145 , 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.105964

  6. Groundnut shell gasification performance in a fluidized bed gasifier with bubbling air as gasification medium

    Dharminder Singh, Sanjeev Yadav, V. M. Rajesh, Pravakar Mohanty. Environmental Technology, 40 (24), 2019. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1476592

  7. Thermodynamic Study of Palm Kernel Shell Gasification for Aggregate Heating in an Asphalt Mixing Plant

    Firman Asto Putro, Sunu Herwi Pranolo, Joko Waluyo, Ary Setyawan. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9 (2), 2020. doi: 10.14710/ijred.9.2.311-317

  8. Hydrogen production from groundnut shell via circulating fluidized bed technology

    Bekir Can LÜTFÜOĞLU, Esat PEHLİVAN, Zuhal AKYÜREK, Ali Özhan AKYÜZ, Afşin GÜNGÖR. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 8 (1), 2021. doi: 10.31593/ijeat.804913

Last update: 2023-09-26 02:48:35

No citation recorded.