DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.45549

Characterization of Lignocellulosic Biomass Samples in Omu-Aran Metropolis, Kwara State, Nigeria, as Potential Fuel for Pyrolysis Yields

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria

2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bells University of Technology, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria

3Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Afe Babalola University, Ado, Ekiti State, Nigeria

4 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa

5 Directorate of Pan African Universities for Life and Earth Institute, PMB 20, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

6 Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Kingsway Campus, South Africa

View all affiliations
Received: 2 Apr 2022; Revised: 2 Jun 2022; Accepted: 28 Jun 2022; Available online: 3 Jul 2022; Published: 1 Nov 2022.
Editor(s): Rock Keey Liew
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study deals with a preliminary investigation of biomass samples' physicochemical, structural composition, and thermal properties to aid the appropriate selection of biomass utilized for pyrolysis operation. The proximate, ultimate, structural composition and thermal analyses were conducted using seven lignocellulose biomass samples obtained in Ajase market, Ajasse Ipo, Kwara State, Nigeria, and Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria. Results showed that the average moisture contents (MC) ranged from 0.12 to 0.44%, and volatile matter (VM) ranged from 73.70 to 83.82%. Fixed carbon (FC) varied from 12.79 to 22.80%, and Ash contents varied between 01.20 to 5.52%. Similarly, the average carbon contents ranged from 45.11 to 50.00%. Hydrogen contents ranged from 5.38 to 6.15%, nitrogen contents varied between 0.20 to 1.24%, and oxygen contents from 43.79 to 48.51%. Also, sulphur contents varied between 0.01 to 0.19%, while the biomass species' average cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents ranged from 28.34 to 45.80%, 25.83 to 34.01%, and 21.96 to 49.63% respectively. The high percentage of VM, C, H, HHV, ignitability index, cellulose, and hemicellulose content recorded in the biomass samples would enhance devolatilization reactivity, ignitability, and burn gases in the reactor, as well as a good production of hydrocarbons content during the pyrolysis process. Also, the low ash content would prevent harmful chemical deposits in the reactor during the pyrolysis process. It can be deduced that shea butter wood was best suited for biofuel generation, closely followed by sugarcane bagasse and palm kernel shell. At the same time, corn cobs possessed the least properties for the pyrolysis process.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Lignocellulose biomass; Proximate analysis; Ultimate analysis; Structural composition; Heating value; Thermal properties

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Comparative Study on Oven and Solar Drying of Agricultural Residues and Food Crops Kinetic Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Gasification in Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Response Surface Method Enhancing Ionic Conductivity of Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Lithium Perchlorate with Crosslinked Citric Acid as Solid Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Polymer Batteries Prospects and Challenges of Malaysia's Distributed Energy Resources in Business Models Towards Zero – Carbon Emission and Energy Security A Review on the Recent Breakthrough Methods and Influential Parameters in the Biodiesel Synthesis and Purification Technical-Environmental Assessment of Energy Management Systems in Smart Ports More recent articles
Most cited articles
The Temperature Profile for The Innovative Design of the Perforated Fin A New Method for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) Blade Optimization Analysing the Possibility of Extracting Energy from Ocean Waves in Cabo-Verde to Produce Clean Electricity - Case-Study: the Leeward Islands Assessment of Wind Energy Potential in Golestan Province of Iran Integration of 5G Technologies in Smart Grid Communication-A Short Survey More cited articles
  1. Acevedo, J. C., Solano, S. P., Durán, J. M., Posso, F. R., & Arenas, E. (2019). Estimation of potential hydrogen production from palm kernel shell in Norte de Santander, Colombia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1386, (2019). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1386/1/0120931
  2. Adeleke, A.A., Odusote, J.K., Ikubanni, P.P.., Lasode, O.A., Malathi, M., & Paswan, D. (2020). The ignitability, fuel ratio and ash fusion temperatures of torrefied woody biomass. Heliyon, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03582
  3. Akinola, A. O., & Fapetu, O. P. (2015). Characteristics Study of Wood Wastes from Sawmills. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 6(6), 606-612. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/12930
  4. Akintola, S. A., & Oki, M., Aleem, A. A., Adediran, A. A., Akpor, O. B. Oluba, O. M., Ogunsemi, B. T. and Ikubanni, P. P. (2019). Valorized chiken feather as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in drillin mud. Results in Engineering, 4(2019), 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100026
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D1102-84. -Standard Test Method for Ash in Wood, 2007
  6. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D2015-00: Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter. West Conshohocken, 2000, 9pp
  7. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D4239-11: Standard test method for sulphur in sample of coal and coke using high temperature tube furnace combustion. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2011
  8. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D5373-21. Standard test methods for determination of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen in analysis samples of coal and carbon in analysis samples of coal and coke. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016
  9. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM E872-82 Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2006
  10. American Society for Testing and Materials, E 1358 – 97: Standard Test Method for Determination of Moisture Content of Particulate Wood Fuels Using a Microwave Oven. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2006
  11. Ayeni, A. O., Daramola, M. O., Awoyomi, A., Elehinafe, F. B., Ogunbiyi, A., Sekoai, P. T., & Folayan, J. A. (2018). Morphological modification of Chromolaena odorata cellulosic biomass using alkaline peroxide oxidation pretreatment methodology and its enzymatic conversion to biobased products. Cogent Engineering, 5 (1), 1509663, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1509663
  12. Baffour-Awuah, E., Akinlabi, S. A., Jen, T. C., Hassan, S., Okokpujie, I. P., & Ishola, F. (2021). Characteristics of Palm Kernel Shell and Palm Kernel Shell-Polymer Composites: A Review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1107(1), 012090. https://doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1107/1/012090
  13. Balogun, A. O., Adeleke, A. A., Ikunbanni, P. P., Adegoke, S. O., Alayat, A. M., & Mcdonald, A. G. (2021). Physico-chemical characterization, thermal decomposition and kinetic modeling of Digitaria sanguinalis under nitrogen and air environments. Case Studies in Thermal Engineeering, 26 (2021), 101138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101138
  14. Banerjee, A., Bansal, N., Kumar, J., Bhaskar, T., Ray, A., & Ghosh, D. (2021). Characterization of the de-oiled yeast biomass for plausible value mapping in a biorefinery perspective. Bioresource Technology, 337 (2021), 125422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125422
  15. Bonfim, W. B., & De Paula, H. M. (2021). Characterization of different biomass ashes as supplementary cementitious material to produce coating mortar. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291 (2021), 125869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125869
  16. Channiwala, S.A., & Parikh, P.P. (2002). A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel, 81(8), 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4
  17. Chukwuneke, J.L., Ewulonu, M.C., Chukwujike, I.C., & Okolie, P.C. (2019). Physico-chemical analysis of pyrolyzed bio-oil from swietenia macrophylla (mahogany) wood. Heliyon, 5 (2019), e01790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01790
  18. Efomah, A. N. & Gbabo, A. (2015). The Physical, Proximate and Ultimate Analysis of Rice Husk Briquettes Produced from a Vibratory Block Mould Briquetting Machine. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2(5), 814-822
  19. Gajeraa, Z. R., Vermaa, K., Tekadeb, S. P., & Sawarkara, A. N. (2020). Kinetics of co-gasification of rice husk biomass and high sulphur petroleum coke with oxygen as gasifying medium via TGA. Bioresource Technology Reports, 11 (2020), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100479
  20. Gautam, N., & Chaurasia, A. (2020). Study on kinetics and bio-oil production from rice husk, rice straw, bamboo, sugarcane bagasse and neem bark in a fixed-bed pyrolysis process. Energy, 190 (2020), 116434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116434
  21. Gravalos, I. , Xyradakis, P. , Kateris, D. , Gialamas, T. , Bartzialis, D., & Giannoulis, K. (2016). An Experimental Determination of Gross Calorific Value of Different Agroforestry Species and Bio-Based Industry Residues. Natural Resources, 7 (2016), 57-68. doi: 10.4236/nr.2016.71006
  22. Ibikunle, R.A., Titiladunayo, I.F., Dahunsi, S.O., Akeju, E.A., & Osueke, C.O. (2021). Characterization and projection of dry season municipal solid waste for energy production in Ilorin metropolis, Nigeria. Waste Management & Research. 39(8), 1048-1057. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20985599
  23. Isah, A. N., Eterigho, E. J., Olutoye, M. A., Garba, M. U., & Okokpujie, I. P. (2020). Development and Test Performance of Heterogeneous Catalysts on Steam Reforming of Bioethanol for Renewable Hydrogen Synthesis: A Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 73 (1) 69-108. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.73.1.69108
  24. Kartal, F., & Ozveren, U. (2021). An improved machine learning approach to estimate hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin in biomass. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications, 2 (2021), 100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100148
  25. Kpalo, S. Y., Zainuddin, M. F., Manaf, L. A. & Roslan, A. M. (2021). Evaluation of hybrid briquettes from corncob and oil palm trunk bark in a domestic cooking application for rural communities in Nigeria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284 (2021), 124745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124745
  26. Kshirsagar, M. P., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2020). Application of multi-response robust parameter design for performance optimization of a hybrid draft biomass cook stove. Renewable Energy, 153 (2020), 1127-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.049
  27. Maksimuk, Y., Antonava, Z., Krouk, V., Korsakova, A., & Kursevich, V. (2021). Prediction of higher heating value (HHV) based on the structural composition for biomass. Fuel, 299 (2021), 120860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120860
  28. Mansor, A. M., Lim, J. S., Ani, F. N., Hashim, H., & Ho, W. S. (2019). Characteristics of Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin of MD2 Pineapple Biomass. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1972014
  29. Menares, T., Herrera, J., Romero, R., Osorio, P., & Arteaga-Pérez, L. E. (2020). Waste tires pyrolysis kinetics and reaction mechanisms explained by TGA and Py-GC/MS under kinetically-controlled regime. Waste Management, 102 (2020), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.027
  30. Merdun, H., & Laouge, Z. B. (2020). Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses during co-pyrolysis of greenhouse wastes and coal by TGA. Renewable Energy, 163 (2021), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.120
  31. Merdun, H., & Laouge, Z. B. (2021). Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses during co-pyrolysis of greenhouse wastes and coal by TGA. Renewable Energy, 163 (2021), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.120
  32. Munir, S., Daood, S.S., Nimmo, W., Cunliffe, A.M., & Gibbs, B.M. (2009). Thermal analysis and devolatilization kinetics of cotton stalk, sugar cane bagasse and shea meal under nitrogen and air atmospheres. Bioresour Technol, 100 (2009), 1413–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.065
  33. Nagarajan, J. & Prakash, L. (2021). Preparation and characterization of biomass briquettes using sugarcane bagasse, corncob and rice husk. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47 (2021), 4194–4198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.457
  34. Nnodim, C. T., Kpu,G. C., Okhuegbe, S. N., Ajani, A. A., Adebayo, S., Diarah, R. S., Aliyu, S. J., Onokwai, A. O., & Osueke, C. O. (2022). Figures of Merit for Wind and Solar PV Integration in Electricity Grids. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 81 (4), 349-357. http://op.niscpr.res.in/index.php/JSIR/article/view/49357/0
  35. Nwosu, F. O. and Muzakir, M. M. (2015). Isolation and Physicochemical Characterization of Lignin from Chromolaena Odorata and Tithonia Diversifolia. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Management, 19 (4) 787–792. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v19i4.28
  36. Okokpujie, I. P., Fayomi, O. S. I., & Oyedepo, S. O. (2019). The role of mechanical engineers in achieving sustainable development goals. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 782-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.023
  37. Okonkwo, U.C., Onokwai, A. O., Okeke, C. L., Osueke, C.O., Ezugwu, C. A., Diarah, R. S., & Aremu, C. O. (2019). Investigation of the effect of temperature on the rate of drying moisture and cyanide contents of cassava chips using oven drying process. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10 (1), 1507-1520. http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=1
  38. Oladejo, O. S., Abiola, A. O., Olanipekun, A. A., & Ajayi, O. E., Onokwai, A. O. (2020). Energy Potential of Solid Waste Generated in Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria. LAUTECH Joural of Civil and Environmental Studies, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.36108/laujoces/0202/50(0150)
  39. Onokwai, A. O., Okonkwo, U. C., Osueke, C. O., Olayanju, T. M. A., & Ibiwoye, M. (2019). Thermal Analysis of Solar Box Cooker in Omu-Aran Metropolis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378 (3) 032065. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1378/3/032065
  40. Onokwai, A. O., Okonkwo, U.C., Osueke, C.O., Okafor, C.O., Olayanju, T.M.A., & Dahunsi, S.O. (2019). Design, Modelling, Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Parabolic Cooker. Renewable, 142(2018), 497-510
  41. Onokwai, A. O., Okonkwo, U.C., Osueke, C.O., Okafor, C.O., Olayanju, T.M.A., & Dahunsi, S.O. (2019). Design, Modelling, Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Parabolic Cooker. Renewable Energy, 142(2018), 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.028
  42. Osueke, C.O., Onokwai, A.O., Olayanju, T.M.A., Ezugwu, C.A., Ikpotokin, I., Uguru-Okorie, D.C., & Nnaji, F.C. (2019). Comparative Calorific Evaluation of Biomass Fuel and Fossil Fuel. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(13):1576-1590. http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType11
  43. Oyebanji, J. A., Fayomi, O. S. I., Oyeniyi, O. I., Akor, P. G., & Ajayi, S. T. (2022). Physico-chemical Analysis of Pyrolyzed Bio-Oil from Lophira alata (Ironwood) Wood. J Environ Pollut Manag, 101(4), 1-9
  44. Ozyuguran, A., & Yaman, S. (2017). Prediction of Calorific Value of Biomass from Proximate Analysis. Energy Procedia, 107, (2017), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.149
  45. Ozyuguran, A., Yaman, S., Kucukbayrak, S. (2018). Prediction of calorific value of biomass based on elemental analysis. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 2(3), 254-260
  46. Qian, C., Li, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Hu, J., & Cao, W. (2020). Prediction of higher heating values of biochar from proximate and ultimate analysis. Fuel, 265 (2020), 116925 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116925
  47. Quan, C., Ma, Z. and Gaoa,N., & He, C. (2018). Pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of corncob hydrolysis residue. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 130 (2018), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.01.025
  48. Rajamma, R., Ball, R.J., Tarelho, L.A.C., Allen, G.C., Labrincha, J.A., Ferreira, V.M. (2009). Characterization and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials. J. Hazard Mater. 172 (2), 1049-1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.109
  49. Roger, M. R., Roger P., & Mandla A. T. (2021). Cell Wall Chemistry from: Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites CRC Press. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/b12487-5
  50. Saleh, A. R., Sudarmanta, B., Fansuri, H., & Muraza, O. (2019). Improve municipal solid waste gasification efficiency using a modified downdraft gasifier with variations of air input and preheated air temperature. Energy Fuel, 33 (2019), 11049-11056. https://doi: org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02486
  51. Sawadogo, M., Kpai, N., Tankoano, I., Tanoh, S.T. & Sidib, S. (2018). Cleaner production in Burkina Faso: case study of fuel briquettes made from cashew industry waste. J. Clean. Prod. 195, 1047-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2018.05.261
  52. Suárez, J.A., Luengo, C.A., Felfli, F.F., Bezzon, G., & Beatón, P.A. (2000). Thermochemical properties of Cuban biomass. Energy Sources 22(2000), 851–7
  53. Tortosa-Masiá, A.A., Buhre, B.J.P., & Gupta, R.P. (2007). Wall TF. Characterizing ash of biomass and waste. Fuel Process Technol., 88 (2007), 1071–81. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.06.011
  54. Umar, H. A., Sulaiman, S. A., Said, M. A. B., & Ahmad, R. K. (2021). Palm Kernel Shell as Potential Fuel for Syngas Production. S. S. Emamian et al. (eds.), Advances in Manufacturing Engineering, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5753-8_25

Last update:

  1. Agricultural Waste to Value-Added Products

    Manimegalai Ambayieram, Mathava Kumar. 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4472-9_9

  2. Application of response surface methodology for the modelling and optimisation of bio-oil yield via intermediate pyrolysis process of sugarcane bagasse

    Anthony O. Onokwai, Imhade P. Okokpujie, Emmanuel S. A. Ajisegiri, Chiebuka T. Nnodim, Joseph F. Kayode, Lagouge K. Tartibu. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 2023. doi: 10.1080/2374068X.2023.2193310

  3. Evaluation of the Effect of Particle Size and Biomass-to-Water Ratio on the Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sugarcane Bagasse

    Leidy Natalia Moreno-Chocontá, Alejandra Sophia Lozano-Pérez, Carlos Alberto Guerrero-Fajardo. ChemEngineering, 8 (2), 2024. doi: 10.3390/chemengineering8020043

  4. Effect of the non-uniform combustion core shape on the biochar production characteristics of the household biomass gasifier stove

    Somchet Chaiyalap, Ritthikrai Chai-ngam, Juthaporn Saengprajak, Jenjira Piamdee, Apipong Putkham, Arnusorn Saengprajak. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 12 (6), 2023. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.56575

  5. Effects of CeO 2 nanoparticles on engine features, tribology behaviors, and environment

    Thanh Tuan Le, Inbanaathan Papla Venugopal, Thanh Hai Truong, Dao Nam Cao, Huu Cuong Le, Xuan Phuong Nguyen. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 45 (3), 2023. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2231387

  6. Estimation of Biomass Fuels’ HHVs Based on Ultimate and Proximate Analysis and Their Combination Data Using MLP-ANN Models

    Sevilay Demirci, Vedat Adiguzel, Muhammet Ali Karabulut, Fikret Akdeniz. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 56 (S1), 2022. doi: 10.3103/S0361521923010123

  7. Modelling and optimisation of intermediate pyrolysis synthesis of bio-oil production from palm kernel shell

    Imhade P. Okokpujie, Anthony O. Onokwai, Ejiroghene Onokpite, Kunle Babaremu, Emmanuel S.A. Ajisegiri, Christian O. Osueke, Stephen A. Akinlabi, Esther T. Akinlabi. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 16 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100672

  8. Prosopis juliflora valorization via microwave-assisted pyrolysis: Optimization of reaction parameters using machine learning analysis

    Dadi V. Suriapparao, B. Rajasekhar Reddy, Chinta Sankar Rao, Lakshman Rao Jeeru, Tanneru Hemanth Kumar. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 169 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105811

  9. Effects of CeO2 nanoparticles on engine features, tribology behaviors, and environment

    Thanh Tuan Le, Inbanaathan Papla Venugopal, Thanh Hai Truong, Dao Nam Cao, Huu Cuong Le, Xuan Phuong Nguyen. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 45 (3), 2023. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2231387

  10. Performance Analysis of the Impact of Mathematical Modelling and Optimisation on Power Generation Systems Via Renewable Sources

    Imhade P. Okokpujie, Jude E. Sinebe, Emmanuel I. Ughapu, Nathaniel I. Ogbodo, S. Swadesh Kumar. E3S Web of Conferences, 430 , 2023. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202343001209

  11. Optimization of process parameters for intermediate pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for biochar production using response surface methodology

    Onokwai O. Anthony, Ibikunle A. Rotimi, Ajisegiri S. A. Emmanuel, Onokpite Ejiroghene, Ezekiel B. Omoniyi, Anyaegbuna E. Benjamin, Aliyu J. Samuel, Igbebuike U. Kingsley. 2023 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Sustainable Development Goals (SEB-SDG), 2023. doi: 10.1109/SEB-SDG57117.2023.10124642

  12. Recent advances in hydrogen production from biomass waste with a focus on pyrolysis and gasification

    Van Giao Nguyen, Thanh Xuan Nguyen-Thi, Phuoc Quy Phong Nguyen, Viet Dung Tran, Ümit Ağbulut, Lan Huong Nguyen, Dhinesh Balasubramanian, Wieslaw Tarelko, Suhaib A. Bandh, Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 54 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.049

Last update: 2024-04-25 02:50:13

No citation recorded.